Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Which Fallen Star Will Anchor This Year's Oscars 'In Memoriam' Segment?

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The 86th annual Academy Awards are being held this Sunday night, March 2, after being bumped out of the month of February by a two-week long fundraiser for Vladimir Putin. The broadcast will mark the climax of this year's sloggy, seemingly endless awards season, which thanks to the rise of the Oscar bloggers, has been drained of the element of surprise that used to make this time of year so exciting. By this point, the presumptive favorites in the major categories seem to have their campaigns on lock, but there is ONE segment of the show left that truly has retained its suspenseful nature: The In Memoriam segment!

We can only imagine the heated conversations that go on behind closed doors at the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (heh heh, “sciences”) while they’re editing this politically loaded segment. Putting ourselves in their very expensive shoes for a moment, we figure that you need to lead the montage off with a notable death, but not TOO notable; producers want audience members to start clapping right away, but you don’t want every other death that follows to be an emotional letdown.

Like a great mixtape, a well-executed death montage has to ebb and flow just so; culturally significant losses must be properly offset with notable industry deaths (guild presidents, producers, network suits), names of whom the viewing public at home will not recognize, so that applause stays steady and doesn’t come to a crashing halt before ending. So, it goes without saying that video has to play well in the room AND also to the millions watching in their living rooms, which is exactly why the ANCHOR position is so important.

The anchor, as you well know, is the very last person in the death montage (if you're being PC, the "In Memoriam" segment). They are the last face that the audience sees and, consequently, the person with whom the audience will remember the most as representing the year that was. With that said, the anchor better DAMN well be someone who is important not just to the industry, but to the culture-at-large—last year, it was composer Marvin Hamlisch which meant that Barbra Streisand appeared to sing "The Way We Were" for her dear friend. So, producers find themselves asking themselves whose sepia-toned headshot BEST embodies the communal spirit of television? Which person can best warm the nation’s cathode tubes and liquid crystal displays in such a way that make tearing up inevitable? Which dead celebrity will keep the audience from flipping over to HBO to find out the identity of the Yellow King on True Detective?

With that in mind, what you'll find here is a guide to handicapping who the Academy feels is the most important person to die since last year's telecast. Some poor schlub has probably been locked in a windowless room in Los Angeles for the last few days feverishly editing this segment together using Final Cut Pro, all the while cursing at Harold Ramis for having the gall to die just a few days before the Oscars.

So let's take a moment to consider the headspace of the lowly editor, and handicap which star of the silver screen will be anchoring this year's In Memoriam segment.

Mark Graham (aka Uncle Grambo) is a picker, a grinner, a lover, and a sinner, as well as being someone who spends a fair amount of time in the dark with strangers. He also watches movies occasionally, too. You can find him on Twitter at @unclegrambo and on Tumblr.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today