With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Which Fallen Star Will Anchor This Year's Oscars 'In Memoriam' Segment?
The 86th annual Academy Awards are being held this Sunday night, March 2, after being bumped out of the month of February by a two-week long fundraiser for Vladimir Putin. The broadcast will mark the climax of this year's sloggy, seemingly endless awards season, which thanks to the rise of the Oscar bloggers, has been drained of the element of surprise that used to make this time of year so exciting. By this point, the presumptive favorites in the major categories seem to have their campaigns on lock, but there is ONE segment of the show left that truly has retained its suspenseful nature: The In Memoriam segment!
We can only imagine the heated conversations that go on behind closed doors at the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (heh heh, “sciences”) while they’re editing this politically loaded segment. Putting ourselves in their very expensive shoes for a moment, we figure that you need to lead the montage off with a notable death, but not TOO notable; producers want audience members to start clapping right away, but you don’t want every other death that follows to be an emotional letdown.
Like a great mixtape, a well-executed death montage has to ebb and flow just so; culturally significant losses must be properly offset with notable industry deaths (guild presidents, producers, network suits), names of whom the viewing public at home will not recognize, so that applause stays steady and doesn’t come to a crashing halt before ending. So, it goes without saying that video has to play well in the room AND also to the millions watching in their living rooms, which is exactly why the ANCHOR position is so important.
The anchor, as you well know, is the very last person in the death montage (if you're being PC, the "In Memoriam" segment). They are the last face that the audience sees and, consequently, the person with whom the audience will remember the most as representing the year that was. With that said, the anchor better DAMN well be someone who is important not just to the industry, but to the culture-at-large—last year, it was composer Marvin Hamlisch which meant that Barbra Streisand appeared to sing "The Way We Were" for her dear friend. So, producers find themselves asking themselves whose sepia-toned headshot BEST embodies the communal spirit of television? Which person can best warm the nation’s cathode tubes and liquid crystal displays in such a way that make tearing up inevitable? Which dead celebrity will keep the audience from flipping over to HBO to find out the identity of the Yellow King on True Detective?
With that in mind, what you'll find here is a guide to handicapping who the Academy feels is the most important person to die since last year's telecast. Some poor schlub has probably been locked in a windowless room in Los Angeles for the last few days feverishly editing this segment together using Final Cut Pro, all the while cursing at Harold Ramis for having the gall to die just a few days before the Oscars.
So let's take a moment to consider the headspace of the lowly editor, and handicap which star of the silver screen will be anchoring this year's In Memoriam segment.
Mark Graham (aka Uncle Grambo) is a picker, a grinner, a lover, and a sinner, as well as being someone who spends a fair amount of time in the dark with strangers. He also watches movies occasionally, too. You can find him on Twitter at @unclegrambo and on Tumblr.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.