With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The Reason Why Old Town Pasadena Is Thriving While Westwood Isn't
Old Town Pasadena comes out victorious in a battle between them and Westwood Village (Photo by Ken Lund via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
In the '80s, Westwood Village was a destination hotspot that was as popular as Old Town Pasadena is now. Old Town on the other hand had a reputation for being Pasadena's skid row.
The reason? It's all about parking, says Donald Shoup, a recently-retired UCLA professor of urban planning. The author of the influential 2005 book "The High Cost of Free Parking," explained his theory to KPCC.
"In 1980, anyone who predicted that Old Pasadena would soon become hip and Westwood would fade would have been judged insane," according to an article Shoup co-wrote with Douglas Kolozsvari, a former associate planner at the San Mateo County Transit District.
Their argument is that free or super cheap parking isn't a good thing for any city, because drivers will end up circling around looking for spots, clogging up the streets, and causing accidents with pedestrians or cyclists.
Sponsor
"What underpricing can do, however, and what it does do, is create a parking shortage that keeps potential customers away," according to Shoup and Kolozsvari. "If it takes only five minutes to drive somewhere else, why spend fifteen cruising for parking?"
It all started in 1993 when Westwood Village store owners banded together to drop the price of curb parking in hopes of getting more customers. However, that same year, Old Town Pasadena ended up installing parking meters, and charging what Shoup and Kolozsvari said was the "unusually high rate of $1 an hour." They figured that customers who didn't want to pay the meter fee would ditch the spot and make room for people who were willing to pay, and more likely be willing to spend more money at the stores and restaurants. The district then used the revenue from the meters to beautify and clean up the city, planting trees and adding streetlamps. Basically, it made the village safer and more desirable to visit.
And Westwood Village? Well, let's just say they didn't come out victorious.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
