Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Cops Think Waze's Police-Tracking Feature Is Putting Them In Danger
Waze sticker at the Google headquarters in Mountain View, CA (Photo by Travis Wise via the Creative Commons on Flickr)
()
After two New York police officers were murdered last month, some cops are now afraid that the Waze traffic app could be used to track their whereabouts and put them in danger. Others are arguing that law enforcement is just wrong about this theory.
LAPD Chief Charlie Beck wrote a letter to Google, Inc. (Waze's parent company) on Dec. 30 voicing his concerns about the real-time, crowd-sourced app that's used to track a variety of road issues, including high-traffic areas, speed traps, car accidents, and even if a police car is nearby, reported AP. Beck wrote that he was afraid that the police-tracking feature could be "misused by those with criminal intent to endanger police officers and the community."
He referenced how he believes Ismaaiyl Brinsley—the man who shot and killed NYPD officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu before taking his own life on Dec. 20—had been using Waze to track down law enforcement since early December. Before the shooting, Brinsley posted on Instagram a screenshot of Waze along with threats to law enforcement. However, investigators don't believe this theory partly because Brinsley's cellphone was found more than two miles away from the site of the shooting.
VentureBeat says that law enforcement's fears are based on a misunderstanding of how the app works. While Waze allows users to drop a pin on a map showing where they've spotted an officer, it's a static feature and doesn't actually track police or follow them. Waze spokeswoman Julie Mossler told the L.A. Times that it doesn't give an exact location, either.
Support for LAist comes from
"We think very deeply about safety and security and work in partnership with the NYPD and other police and departments of transportation all over the world... to help municipalities better understand what's happening in their cities in real time," Mossler said. "These relationships keep citizens safe, promote faster emergency response and help alleviate traffic congestion. Police partners support Waze and its features, including reports of police presence, because most users tend to drive more carefully when they believe law enforcement is nearby."
However, Beck isn't the only one voicing his concerns about the app. Sheriff Mike Brown of Bedford County, Virginia spoke out about this issue at a National Sheriffs' Association meeting in Washington Jan. 23. "The police community needs to coordinate an effort to have the owner, Google, act like the responsible corporate citizen they have always been and remove this feature from the application even before any litigation or statutory action," he said.
As of Monday, Beck still hasn''t received a response from Google, Inc., and the tech company has not commented about the situation.
There are others who feel it's fair for us to keep tabs on police officers. Electronic Freedom Foundation spokesman Steve Maass told VentureBeat that it's ironic that law enforcement is saying the Waze police-tracking function is a problem given that officers justify using public surveillance tools like license plate scanning and facial recognition technology to track citizens in public.
"Individuals have the right to share information about police officers who are on duty and in public," ACLU's Lee Rowland told VentureBeat. "Shutting down the public's right to exchange information is not an effective or constitutional method for ensuring the safety of law enforcement."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake. -
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
Best of LAist