Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

LADWP Rate Hike on Hold, Al Gore Urges its Approval

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

ladwp-carbon-surcharge-al-gore.jpg
Photo by curiouslee via Flickr


Photo by curiouslee via Flickr
The L.A. City Council today asserted jurisdiction over last week's decision by the Board of Water and Power Commission to increase electricity rates via a carbon surcharge, a move meant to avoid a downgraded bond rating and increase L.A.'s renewable energy portfolio to 20% by the end of 2010. The jurisdictional assertion allows the council to review and consider the rate hike. They may only reject or approve the plan and cannot make adjustments to the plan.

In a memo Monday evening, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa warned of bankruptcy if the carbon surcharge was not approved. Today, former Vice President Al Gore and Bill Corcoran of the Sierra Club came out in support of the plan.

"[Villaraigosa] has introduced one of the most forward-thinking clean energy plans I have ever seen," Gore wrote. Corcoran added that the plan "would shine much-needed sunlight on the DWP planning process, create thousands of local jobs and generate the funds for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects that will harness the power of sunlight to wean our City off dirty and dangerous coal-fired power.

Critics say the extra charges will be a financial burden during the recession and that the plan is not transparent. Both the LA Times and Daily News editorialized against it.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right