Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

First of Four Electricity Rate Hikes for 2010 Approved

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today . 

ladwp-rate-hike.jpg
Photo by Omar Omar via Flickr
()


Photo by Omar Omar via Flickr
Your LADWP electricity bill will likely be increasing April 1st to help the nation's largest municipal utility cover its bills and build its renewable energy portfolio, thanks to a unanimous vote yesterday by its board. The vote affirms a 0.8 of a cent per kilowatt hour increase that can only be denied by the Los Angeles City Council if it chooses to--and it will--assert jurisdiction over the manner (note that the council only has power to deny board moves, but not the ability to tweak language or rates).

At issue is the department's bond rating as a downgrade could cost the utility even more. Also, by not hitting 33% renewable energy by 2020, LADWP would face fines. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa wants to be at 40% by that year.

A few issues are making this move controversial:

  • The approval means an 8.8% to 28.4% increase in bills across the city. Some, including businesses like the LAUSD, fear the affordability of this.
  • Some claim the plan fails to address how and when the city will ween itself of coal.
  • Others have issue with the transparency of this week's move. The language of the action wasn't available until late Tuesday or Wednesday. The board voted on Thursday in a meeting that wasn't posted 72 hours in advance (they claimed it as a "special meeting" even though the rate increase vote was expected for weeks).

In the end, the move towards renewable energy is much needed. And even with transparency issues aside, how much controversy would this draw? The positive is that this should force Angelenos to think more efficiently by using such products and tools as CFLs and Google Powermeter. The negative of that is this: can everyone afford to go green? If not, who will help on next month's bill?

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist