With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Ezell Ford Family Reaches Tentative Settlement With City, Waits On City Council Approval
A memorial set up for Ezell Ford in 2014. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)
()
The parents of Ezell Ford, a 25-year-old black man who was fatally shot by LAPD officers in 2014, have reached a settlement with the city, the L.A. Times reports. The settlement—the terms of which have not be released—won't be finalized until the City Council approves it.
Ford was walking near his family's home in South L.A. on August 11, 2014 when he was approached by officers Sharlton Wampler and Antonio Villegas. The officers tried to speak with him, but Ford, who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, continued to walk away. According to the LAPD's account of the incident, Ford had his hands hidden near his waistband.
At one point Ford walked into a driveway and hid behind a car. One of the officers reached for Ford, and Ford forced the officer to the ground, LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck later claimed. Wampler would later allege that Ford had reached for his gun. Villegas fired two shots at Ford, and Wampler also shot Ford in the back. According to Beck, DNA evidence on Wampler's guns, as well as scratches on Wampler's holster and arms, corroborated his claims that he was in a physical struggle with Ford.
While Beck believed that the officers had acted within department policy, the Los Angeles Police Commission ruled differently in June of 2015. The commission—a panel of civilians who oversee the LAPD's actions—said that Wampler had violated policy because he didn't have a justifiable cause for approaching Ford. Also, the commission disapproved of Villegas' initial decision to draw his gun during the confrontation. The panel, however, did say that Villegas was justified in shooting Ford to protect Wampler.
Support for LAist comes from
Danny Abir, managing partner of Abir, Cohen, Treyzon, and Salo—the law firm representing Ford's family—said that he expects the City Council to reach a decision on the settlement within 90 days, as that's how long these cases usually take.
Sergeant Jack Richter of the LAPD said that the department does "not have comments on the matter, yet, because nothing's happened until the City Council decides." Richter added that, "we're probably not going to comment on anything litigious."
The district attorney's office has not yet announced if it'll be filing charges against against the officers. Jane Robison, a spokesperson with L.A. County District Attorney's office, said the DA’s investigation into the shooting is still under review, according to KPCC.
Wampler and Villegas have been confined to desk duty since the shooting. In August, both officers sued the city, claiming that they are victims of racial discrimination. Villegas is Latino, and department records list Wampler as Asian, though he identified himself as white in the lawsuit. The suit claims that the officers were discriminated because of their race, as well as the race of Ford. The officers allege that they've been denied advancement, overtime, transfers and other employment opportunities as retaliation for the shooting.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden board walk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
Best of LAist