With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The Super Sad Numbers Of The Underrepresented Groups In Hollywood
Though we all know deep down that there's a lack of diversity when it comes to filmmakers and actors in the movie industry, it's another thing to look at some seriously depressing figures about it. It just makes it that much more real. A new USC study released on Monday revealed just how underrepresented minorities are in Hollywood.
The Media, Diversity, & Social Change Initiative (MDSCI) at USC’s Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism took a look at the 100 top-grossing films from 2007 to 2010 and 2012 to 2013, and studied the numbers of all the people who had speaking roles, whether it was just one word or many that they uttered on screen.
Despite the fact that folks with Hispanic and Latino backgrounds are filling up the seats at the theaters (they make up 25 percent of the movie tickets sales) and represent 16.3 percent of the nation's population, the study showed that their group was one of the most underrepresented.
Hispanic and Latinos had 4.9 percent of the speaking roles. Black characters only made up 14.1 percent of the speaking roles, in contrast to the 74.1 percent of white actors. And in tow, Asians made up 4.4 percent, and Middle Eastern actors with 1 percent.
Support for LAist comes from
“Hispanics and Latinos are one of the fastest-growing groups in the U.S.,” said Marc Choueiti, one of the study’s authors. “If popular films were the only way to gauge diversity, viewers would be completely unaware of this. Individuals from this group are almost invisible on screen.”
And even though on the surface it seemed like 2013 was a better year for black filmmakers and actors—with Steven McQueen being the first black director to snag the Oscars' Best Picture golden statuette for 12 Years a Slave, and other films like The Butler and 42 at the helm during awards season—that didn't ring true with the reality of the industry. In fact, the folks behind the study didn't see any "meaningful difference" of the underrepresented groups in the 600 films they studied of the six-year period. In 2013, of the 107 directors who made the top 100 grossing films, only 6.5 percent of them were black (and in those numbers, seven of those films were helmed by five black directors). (And according to BuzzFeed, blacks make up 13.1 percent of the U.S. population and make up 11 percent of North American movie ticket sales.)
And if race wasn't already a big enough issue in getting speaking roles, there are some major disparities between different genders. Men outnumbered women across the board in film roles, according to the study, though Hispanic/Latino women (37.5 percent) were more likely to be featured in popular films than other races (white women filled 29.6 percent of the speaking roles).
Earlier this year, the 2014 Hollywood Diversity Report was released, which also showed some disparaging numbers. Dr. Darnell Hunt, the leader of the study told the Daily Mail about the major problem with the film industry's lack of diversity: "So when you have a society that’s becoming more and more diverse, if you have an industry that is lagging, you have a distorted view of what’s going on in the world… You have a very narrow depiction of what is normal and what is American."
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
Best of LAist