One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Taggers Don't Have to Pay City Millions for Graffiti Cleanup
Photo by Nuno_Oliveira via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
A controversial injunction imposed upon some of Los Angeles' most prolific taggers has been successfully challenged, and as a result, members of a tagging crew will not have to pay the city back millions of dollars for the graffiti cleanup.
The injunction was filed in 2010 against Metro Transit Assassins (MTA), in response to their massive quarter-mile-long tag of their name along the L.A. River's concrete bed. The piece was positioned strategically so as to be seen from not only freeway traffic, but from planes going in and out of Bob Hope Airport and LAX.
The MTA crew were also linked to about 500 other documented taggings in the city.
The injunction stipulated that not only did the taggers have to pay the city $1.2 million in penalties and $3.7 million in damages, but they were also banned from associating with one another or from possessing weapons or graffiti tools.
Initially, the injunction also sought to prohibit taggers from profiting from their graffiti artwork. That landed local artist "Smear" in legal hot water--though he was never part of the MTA or their massive L.A. River tag "bomb."
Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California challenged the proposed injunction on 1st Amendment grounds, but a judge found that the constitution "does not protect destruction of public or private property by graffiti vandalism, trespass and illegal activities."
Sponsored message
The lawsuit resulted in a settlement, finalized today. While the taggers don't have to pay back the city, they must not associated with each other, and they must refrain from participating in acts of graffiti vandalism. They are also subject to an adult curfew, and must perform 100 hours of graffiti removal.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
