Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Bike Haters Can't Stop Bike Lanes Coming To Westwood And South L.A.

bike_lane.jpg
Bike lane love (Photo by Gary Kavanagh via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your tax-deductible donation now.

L.A. City Council's decision to approve Mobility Plan 2035 last August made lots of people—who apparently think cars are the future—angry. For this reason, the City Planning Commission held a special meeting this morning to determine whether or not proposed bike lanes on two streets, Westwood Boulevard and S. Central Avenue, would be removed from the plan, as several folks and two City Councilman want.

Following hours of public comment from community representatives and stakeholders alike, the Planning Commission decided the lanes should stay, according to Streetsblog Los Angeles.

This choice goes against the wishes of L.A. City Councilman Curren Price, from South L.A., and Paul Koretz, from West L.A. Both Price and Koretz argue that the proposed lanes should, on the streets in their respective districts, be eliminated from the Mobility Plan.

Koretz argues, according to the L.A. Times, that adding lanes will make the streets less safe for people on bikes, saying that more riders means more collisions. Of course, this argument completely overlooks that the Westwood Boulevard (similar to Central Avenue) is already a heavily used biking-corridor, close to UCLA, with no current infrastructure.

Price echoes this logic, and said in an email to Streetsblog how "as a grandfather of small children," he "would feel uneasy riding our bikes along this busy thoroughfare knowing the dangerous implications."

Dangerous implications, like riding totally unprotected in high-speed traffic? Or like riding adjacent that traffic in a designated lane?

Per Price's reasoning, the street is simply too unsafe for bicycles, and therefore, despite being the most heavily bicycle-trafficked street in all of Los Angeles, the bike lanes will lead to more trouble.

Sponsored message

This is malarkey, given designating space on the street specifically for people on bikes only makes the street safer. Over the past decade, Central Avenue has seen more than 300 reported collisions between bicycles and vehicles. Westwood Boulevard is, likewise, the site of 52 collisions.

Mobility Plan 2035 is an attempt by the city of Los Angeles to help people move themselves around the city more easily. The City Planning department believes that the best way to do this is by prioritizing the development of public transportation, and encouraging people to walk or ride a bike. At the same time, prioritizing transit and other non-car options means appropriating some street-space currently used by private vehicles and handing it over to bikes and buses.

Consequently, as admitted by the Department of Planning, traffic in some locations will get worse. The trade-off is that these neighborhoods will have vastly better transportation infrastructure, giving Angelenos the option to really use public transportation in a way they haven't been able to in decades.

The bike lanes will stay.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right