Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Bike Haters Can't Stop Bike Lanes Coming To Westwood And South L.A.

bike_lane.jpg
Bike lane love (Photo by Gary Kavanagh via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

L.A. City Council's decision to approve Mobility Plan 2035 last August made lots of people—who apparently think cars are the future—angry. For this reason, the City Planning Commission held a special meeting this morning to determine whether or not proposed bike lanes on two streets, Westwood Boulevard and S. Central Avenue, would be removed from the plan, as several folks and two City Councilman want.

Following hours of public comment from community representatives and stakeholders alike, the Planning Commission decided the lanes should stay, according to Streetsblog Los Angeles.

This choice goes against the wishes of L.A. City Councilman Curren Price, from South L.A., and Paul Koretz, from West L.A. Both Price and Koretz argue that the proposed lanes should, on the streets in their respective districts, be eliminated from the Mobility Plan.

Koretz argues, according to the L.A. Times, that adding lanes will make the streets less safe for people on bikes, saying that more riders means more collisions. Of course, this argument completely overlooks that the Westwood Boulevard (similar to Central Avenue) is already a heavily used biking-corridor, close to UCLA, with no current infrastructure.

Sponsor

Price echoes this logic, and said in an email to Streetsblog how "as a grandfather of small children," he "would feel uneasy riding our bikes along this busy thoroughfare knowing the dangerous implications."

Dangerous implications, like riding totally unprotected in high-speed traffic? Or like riding adjacent that traffic in a designated lane?

Per Price's reasoning, the street is simply too unsafe for bicycles, and therefore, despite being the most heavily bicycle-trafficked street in all of Los Angeles, the bike lanes will lead to more trouble.

This is malarkey, given designating space on the street specifically for people on bikes only makes the street safer. Over the past decade, Central Avenue has seen more than 300 reported collisions between bicycles and vehicles. Westwood Boulevard is, likewise, the site of 52 collisions.

Mobility Plan 2035 is an attempt by the city of Los Angeles to help people move themselves around the city more easily. The City Planning department believes that the best way to do this is by prioritizing the development of public transportation, and encouraging people to walk or ride a bike. At the same time, prioritizing transit and other non-car options means appropriating some street-space currently used by private vehicles and handing it over to bikes and buses.

Consequently, as admitted by the Department of Planning, traffic in some locations will get worse. The trade-off is that these neighborhoods will have vastly better transportation infrastructure, giving Angelenos the option to really use public transportation in a way they haven't been able to in decades.

The bike lanes will stay.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right