Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Los Angeles Finally Comes Up With A Serious Plan For People Who Don't Drive
Bike lane love (Photo by Gary Kavanagh via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
()
A new plan to make L.A. roads safer and offer more alternatives to driving was just approved by the City Council. The massive new transportation plan aims to add hundreds of miles of bike lanes, bus-only lanes and other major road redesigns across L.A over the next 20 years. Known by the snoozer-of-a-name Mobility Plan 2035 (.pdf), the longterm plan navigates a new approach to public streets that focuses on offering more alternatives to driving and ambitiously seeks to reduce fatalities from collisions to zero, reports the L.A. Times. In a city that has been so car-centric for so many decades, a plan that would encourage more motorists—even a small portion—to choose alternative transportation could have a significant impact on the overall miles driven around town.
Councilman Mike Bonin, who strongly supports the plan, tells the L.A. Times, "This is a document that helps us prioritize public safety, so that those who are walking and bicycling and trying to get around [without] a car don't get killed." Bonin sees the plan as a way to address the city's "legacy of shame" when it comes to auto collisions involving children and the elderly. By taking steps to reduce traffic speeds the plan would help to save lives he explains, "Right now, only 5% of those hit by a car going 20 miles per hour die. Over 80% of those who are hit by a car going 40 miles per hour die."
The council voted 12 to 2 to approve the plan to the pleasure of many business groups, transit advocates and groups seeking to increase bike lanes. But of course there were others who were not as stoked about the plan. Opponents, many of whom are on the Westside—ahem, Beverly Hills and Westwood—are preparing to sue, arguing that the city's own analysis shows that loss of roadways for cars will increase congestion and reduce response times for emergency vehicles.
To approve the plan, the council had to sign a legal declaration that says the benefits of the plan outweigh potential downsides. The city's Environmental Impact Report for Mobility Plan 2035 indicated that adverse impacts could include increased congestion, noise, cut-through traffic, and potentially reduced access for emergency vehicles. On the other hand, another part of the report says the plan will cut the number of vehicle trips by 1.7 million miles per day.
Support for LAist comes from
The council did delay for a month a decision on whether to drop some streets from the plans for bike lanes, including Westwood Boulevard, Lankershim Boulevard and Central Avenue.
The two opposing votes came from council members Paul Koretz and Gil Cedillo. Cedillo has had a history of opposing plans that reduce lanes for motorists in favor of bike lanes.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity. -
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
Best of LAist