Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

In Case of 15-Year-Old Gay Student's Killing, Closing Arguments to Begin

pride flag.jpg
Photo by ccharmon via the LAist Featured Photos pool

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Closing arguments are set to begin today in the case of Brandon McInerney, a 17-year-old Oxnard boy accused of shooting his classmate Larry King to death in 2008, reports ABC 7. The trial has generated a great deal of national attention and controversy, in large part because King was gay. TIME reports that McInerney's defense has attempted to build a case around the notion that the defendant was provoked by King's actions to do what an entire classroom witnessed: sit behind King in class, pull a handgun out of his bag, and shoot King twice in the back of the head.

Defense attorney Scott Wippert has said that King taunted McInerney, and that McInerney's abusive home contributed to his violent actions:

Wippert says King's advances amounted to sexual harassment and were partly responsible for the shooting. Witnesses have said King came to school wearing women's accessories like make-up and high-heeled boots and made flirtatious comments to McInerney such as "Love you baby!"

The defense has even called witnesses in to testify about the way King dressed at school.

But the prosecution is calling bullshit. They say that defense attorneys are relying almost completely on victim-blaming and a culture of pervasive homophobia:

"This entire defense is built on a bias against the victim, and this hope that people will buy into the fact that the way he was and they way he dressed was so provoking that a reasonable person would have reacted the way the defendant did," [Prosecutor Maeve] Fox said in court. "It's tragic and nauseating at the same time."

A recent LA Times article also examined whether the school should have done more to prevent King from dressing the way that he wanted to dress, implying that maybe if he had looked...a little less gay, we have to assume?...he wouldn't have been killed:

Sponsored message
One teacher after another has testified in the murder trial about their deep worries that King's feminine attire and taunting behavior could provoke problems — and that E.O. Green Junior High administrators ignored them.

Because forcing kids to repress their sexuality is clearly the way to keep everyone safe.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today