Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Why and how we reported on putrid odors
    Vernon-Rendering Plant

    Topline:

    Southeast L.A. residents have grappled with the stench of rotting flesh for decades, on top of other environmental ills.

    Why now: LAist reporter Julia Barajas recounts two bus rides — one as a student waiting for her ride to high school and the other as a reporter that got her thinking about where the terrible smells she grew up with in Southeast L.A. originated.

    Why it matters: Barajas goes deep into what's happened since her student days in the early 2000s and why the odors continue to this day. She reports: "What was most startling was that all this was happening after air quality officials adopted a rule intended to prevent those very odors."

    When I was still in high school, my bus stop was on the corner of Miles and Saturn avenues, in the city of Huntington Park. It was across the street from an elementary school, and a stone’s throw from city hall, the public library, and a very nice little park.

    Each weekday morning, I’d stand on that corner to wait for a yellow LAUSD school bus to pick me up and take me to a magnet school in the South Bay. Every so often, a putrid odor would fill the crisp morning air. I’d hold my breath to avoid taking it in. Then, I’d stare down the street, hoping the bus would get there early and whisk me away.

    In some ways, that's where the reporting for this series started — back in the early 2000s, back when I was still in high school and experiencing those bad smells that still occur today.

    During daytime, a young woman dressed in mostly black stands at the corner of a street with a light-blue house and white fence behind her. She appears to be waiting for a bus.
    LAist reporter Julia Barajas stands at the corner in Huntington Park, where she waited for the school bus as a child.
    (
    Samanta Helou Hernandez
    /
    LAist
    )

    What a 'Toxic Tour' of Southeast L.A. has to do with this investigation

    I recently hopped on another bus in Huntington Park — two decades later and now a reporter for LAist. I was with a group of high school students on a “Toxic Tour” of the area where I’d grown up.

    The “Toxic Tour” is hosted by Communities for Better Environment (CBE), a nonprofit that’s advocated for clean air, soil, and water since the late 1970s. The tour takes you on a four-hour journey that highlights the impact of industrial polluters on residents’ health and quality of life. It also emphasizes how community members have fought back against environmental ills, this as a means of inspiring the next generation of activists. In September 2022, our tour was specifically designed for residents of Southeast L.A.

    That day, the bus took us to:

    • Park Avenue Elementary School in the city of Cudahy, which was shut down after parents and teachers raised concerns about the petroleum waste that bubbled up on the playground.
    • It also took us to Linda Esperanza Marquez High School in Huntington Park, named for a community member who fought to clean up the site it sits on, once known as La Montaña for debris from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. For years, local residents dealt with the dust that blew from 600,000 tons of concrete ruins from the collapse of the Santa Monica Freeway stored there.
    • And we made a stop at Exide Technologies in the city of Vernon.

    For decades, this battery recycling plant spewed lead into surrounding neighborhoods. After this came to light, the company filed for bankruptcy, leaving it up to California taxpayers to pay for the removal of contaminated soil from schools, parks, and thousands of homes.

    Smelling that familiar stench

    As we stood outside the battery plant, I recognized a stench: the same one I used to smell while waiting for the bus. A student from South Gate High recognized it, too. She said it was something she often encountered on her campus.

    A mural of a pig in a green filed and a sign that reads "Farmer John & Co. First Ham" "Goodness for more than half a century" "Santa Fe Trail 1871"
    Farmer John's Vernon facility, which closed earlier this year, is covered in murals depicting pastoral scenes with happy pigs.
    (
    Samanta Helou Hernandez
    /
    LAist
    )

    Our tour guides told us that Southeast L.A. residents often attribute this dead animal odor to the Farmer John slaughterhouse in Vernon, which is renowned for its hauntingly picturesque pig murals. (Farmer John shut down the facility earlier this year.) On the tour, the guides pointed out that Vernon is also home to facilities that recycle animal remains from slaughterhouses, grocery stores, restaurants, and shelters. Through a process called “rendering,” those remains are turned into materials that can be used for other products.

    I thought about the rendering plants on my drive home from work a few days later. While heading south on the 5 Freeway near the city of Commerce, a nauseating smell entered my car. I rushed to roll up the windows, but the stench still left me with a sharp headache.

    I looked around to see where it could be coming from, wondering if anyone monitored odor emissions. When I got home, I checked.

    What I learned about who was responsible for regulations

    A truck blurs by the front of a bland white and orange building with the words "Vernon Industrial Park" upon it.
    Vernon is a primarily industrial city near Downtown Los Angeles and Boyle Heights.
    (
    Samanta Helou Hernandez
    /
    LAist
    )

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) is tasked with monitoring and improving air quality in most of L.A. County. I also learned that community members can file odor complaints. Then, through CBE, I found out that AQMD was in the process of shutting down a rendering plant that the agency said had repeatedly broken the rules.

    I mentioned all this to my editor, Mary Plummer, and she encouraged me to file public records requests with AQMD. Our goal was to get a better sense of the odors’ impact on local communities.

    One of my first requests called for all air quality complaints from August 2022 to the present filed in Vernon, along with neighboring areas and some non-adjacent cities. I also requested all air quality complaints associated with Baker Commodities, Inc. the rendering plant that I'd heard was being shut down by regulators. In this case, we asked for records dating back to August 2019.

    The first batch of public records data was illuminating. In recent years, AQMD has received hundreds of complaints about rendering plant odors. As I read through them, I noticed that some were from local schools, while others were from local businesses. One complainant said “IT SMELLS LIKE ROTTING DEAD BODIES EVERY SINGLE DAY.” Another person said that the “ODOR IS SO BAD THAT EVERYONE HAS LEFT THE OFFICE, AGAIN.”

    What is a rendering plant?

    A rendering plant is a facility that converts livestock and pet carcasses, as well as kitchen grease and wastewater, into industrial-use fats and oils. Once converted, these materials are used to manufacture soaps, cosmetics, and many other products.

    • What type of companies send dead animals and other materials to rendering plants? Typically slaughterhouses, restaurants, supermarkets, and animal shelters. 
    • For example, many grocery stores collect meat and bone scraps from their butcher departments and send them to rendering plants.
    • Good to know: Not all facilities process the same type of items. According to AQMD, some rendering companies process animals from shelters, while others, like Baker Commodities, Inc., primarily render livestock and poultry.

    The complainants also said the stench made it difficult for them to breathe. They said it gave them headaches and made their stomachs churn, that it made their eyes itch and throats burn. Some community members reported smelling it in the evenings, others encountered it while dropping off their kids at school. Many said it was worse on hot days, and that they had to close their windows to avoid it. Some said the stench wouldn’t let them sleep. Some said they’d been smelling it for days in a row. Others were outraged because they’d been smelling it for years.

    What was most startling was that all complaints were filed after air quality officials adopted a rule intended to prevent those very odors.

    Understanding why regulators shut down Baker Commodities, Inc.

    With this in mind, I looked into what was behind the shutdown of Baker’s rendering company. After scouring dozens of court documents, I confirmed that the company has sued AQMD for $200 million in damages. Perhaps more significantly, the lawsuit also aims to bar the agency from shutting down the plant again in the future.

    These are the steps I took to fully understand what’s on the line with this lawsuit:

    • Reached out to dozens of stakeholders, including rendering plant workers who could potentially lose their jobs. 
    • Repeatedly called Baker’s headquarters in Vernon and their lead attorney on the case, and spent many hours researching the company.
    • I spoke with environmental justice activists and local officials who’d lodged complaints on behalf of their constituents. 
    • Then, to learn more about how rendering helps the environment,  I spoke with two agricultural experts. 
    • To better understand how the odors can wreak havoc on community members’ health and quality of life, I spoke with experts in public health. 
    • I asked a historian/geographer to delve into Vernon’s long-term relationship with its neighbors.
    • I also reached out to an attorney who is well-versed in environmental conflicts to help me navigate court records. 
    • I visited every rendering plant repeatedly and noticed that one didn’t have any signage to let passersby know where to report odors, which has been required since late 2017 under AQMD's Rule 415 to minimize the odors. 
    • And through this reporting, I realized that two of the rendering plants are within walking distance from Exide. 

    Why the area's history was so important

    Exide’s proximity to the rendering plants matters to those with ties to the area. Over the course of my reporting, I spoke at length with community members throughout Southeast L.A., as well as Boyle Heights and unincorporated East Los Angeles. We chatted on the phone, on social media, and in person, often at parks or in front of their homes. In some cases, I left notes in their mailboxes — in English and in Spanish.

    Two stacks of papers, one is in English, and one is Spanish. The papers ask people if they've noticed bad smells in their neighborhood. A business card for reporter LAist reporter Julia Barajas is attached to the papers.
    Flyers distributed by LAist reporter Julia Barajas during her reporting process.
    (
    Julia Barajas
    /
    LAist
    )

    Time and again, local residents said they felt their communities had been pummeled by environmental injustice. Some brought up the Delta jet that dumped fuel on a school in Cudahy in 2020. Others brought up the explosion at a scrap metal recycler in Maywood in 2016. Many underscored that Exide was allowed to operate without permits for decades. To ask community members to endure the stench of decaying carcasses while the soil in many homes is still being remediated, they said, is to add insult to injury.

    These interviews included Cristina Garcia, a former state Assemblymember who grew up in Bell Gardens and taught math at Huntington Park High.

    Garcia said that when she was teaching, she often had to choose between opening the windows and letting in the stench, or keeping them closed and subjecting her students to a hot room without air conditioning. She said it was hard for students to learn in those conditions. And it was hard for her to teach.

    Communities like ours “have been treated like dumping grounds,” Garcia said. She’s certain that the ongoing stench of rotting flesh would not be tolerated in more affluent parts of town, so “why is this how we have to live?”

    That question has stayed with me.

    Credits

    This story is part of a series that was reported over the course of many months and required extensive interviews in the community and a dozen public records requests. Julia Barajas is the lead reporter and Mary Plummer is the main story editor.

    More on the LAist team behind this investigation:

    Reporting:

    Editing:

    Visuals:

    Other support:

    The Jane and Ron Olson Center for Investigative Reporting helped make this project possible. Ron Olson is an honorary trustee of Southern California Public Radio. The Olsons do not have any editorial input on the stories we cover.

  • What you need to know about tonight's address

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump will address a joint session of Congress tonight for his first State of the Union address since returning to the White House just over one year ago.

    Why it matters: It's an opportunity for the president to tout his agenda and shape his party's messaging ahead of this year's midterm elections. But the prime-time address comes at a moment when the president has seen his agenda complicated on multiple fronts. That includes trade, where his tariff policies were dealt a rebuke last week by the U.S. Supreme Court, and immigration, where Trump and congressional Democrats are deadlocked over funding the Department of Homeland Security.

    What time is the address? The president is expected to begin at 6 p.m. PT., and if history is any indication, prepare for a long night. Last year, in what was technically not a State of the Union speech, Trump addressed Congress for over 90 minutes, breaking records as the longest joint address in at least 60 years.

    Read on... for more about the address.

    President Donald Trump will address a joint session of Congress tonight for his first State of the Union address since returning to the White House just over one year ago.

    It's an opportunity for the president to tout his agenda and shape his party's messaging ahead of this year's midterm elections.

    But the prime-time address comes at a moment when the president has seen his agenda complicated on multiple fronts. That includes trade, where his tariff policies were dealt a rebuke last week by the U.S. Supreme Court, and immigration, where Trump and congressional Democrats are deadlocked over funding the Department of Homeland Security.

    Plus, Americans are divided on whether Trump's first year has been a success. Six in 10 believe the country is worse off than last year, according to the latest NPR/PBS News/Marist poll, and a majority think the state of the union is not strong.

    Here's what you need to know ahead of tonight's speech.

    What time is the address?

    The president is expected to begin at 6 p.m. PT., and if history is any indication, prepare for a long night. Last year, in what was technically not a State of the Union speech, Trump addressed Congress for over 90 minutes, breaking records as the longest joint address in at least 60 years.


    NPR will be covering all of it with live special coverage and analysis. You can listen on NPR.org, on many public radio stations, in the NPR app or by telling your Alexa device to "Ask NPR to play Special Coverage" starting at 6 p.m.

    Why does this happen every year? 

    This is part of the gig for every president. The Constitution requires that the president "shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union." It's intended to be a recap of sorts of their previous year in office.

    So it's a formality, yes, but there are political stakes. Trump's speech comes at the start of a crucial election year, and his party is on the defensive. GOP lawmakers are fighting to maintain control of the Senate, where they currently hold a 53 to 47 majority, and the House, where their margin is even smaller, 218 to 214. Trump is battling low approval numbers, which are often seen as a warning sign, given that since World War II the party controlling the White House historically loses an average of 27 House seats in the midterms and four in the Senate.

    What will Trump talk about?

    Expect a big focus on immigration, which has been a key pillar of Trump's second term. The administration has defended its enforcement agenda, arguing it's aimed at removing people living in the country illegally who have committed dangerous crimes. However, lawmakers have raised concerns about the tactics used by federal immigration agents in cities around the country, especially after two U.S. citizens were killed in Minneapolis last month.

    It will also be worth watching how Trump talks about tariffs. He has long defended imposing import taxes on foreign goods as a way to strengthen American manufacturing, but in a major ruling last Friday, the Supreme Court struck down the main lever the president has used to carry out this policy.

    The tariff ruling is part of a broader economic messaging challenge facing the White House. A majority of Americans already say they think tariffs are more likely to hurt than help the economy. Trump has also dismissed affordability concerns as a Democratic "hoax," even though voters report struggling to keep up with the cost of living.

    Tonight's address is also happening at a crucial moment in U.S. foreign policy. Trump is pressuring Iran to disband its nuclear program, and he has not ruled out using force to make that happen. In recent days, the American military has expanded its presence in the Middle East, sending additional fighter jets and a second aircraft carrier to the region.

    It's the latest move by Trump in what has been a more muscular approach to foreign policy compared to his first term. The president has approved strikes on countries around the world, announced the U.S. will "run" Venezuela after arresting the country's leader and has threatened to buy Greenland. At the same time, Trump has repeatedly labeled himself a peacemaker, despite facing steep challenges in achieving his goals of rebuilding Gaza and brokering an end to Russia's war in Ukraine.

    What will the response from Democrats look like?

    Newly sworn-in Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger is slated to provide the party's official rebuttal. Spanberger was one of several Democrats who won their races last November, delivering some of the most high-profile victories since the party's bruising losses across the country in 2024.

    She may also provide a potential preview of how Democrats may approach their own midterm messaging. On the campaign trail, Spanberger centered her message on affordability concerns and criticized the administration's treatment of federal workers through mass layoffs and the longest government shutdown in history.

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, a woman with light skin tone, blonde gray hair, wearing a white cream coat, stands behind a wooden podium and smiles.
    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger speaks after being sworn in to office at the Virginia State Capitol in January. Spanberger will deliver the official Democratic response to President Trump's State of the Union address.
    (
    Win McNamee
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    California Sen. Alex Padilla is tapped to deliver the Spanish-language response for Democrats. It's another notable pick for Democrats as they refine their election message, particularly on immigration. Padilla has been an outspoken critic of Trump's immigration agenda and was forcibly removed from a Homeland Security press conference over the summer.

    There's also a group of roughly a dozen House and Senate Democrats who plan to boycott Trump's speech and instead hold a counter-rally dubbed the "People's State of the Union." It comes as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has urged lawmakers to either "attend with silent defiance" or skip the event.

    Follow for more coverage:

    📧 NPR Politics newsletter: Breaking down the big stories and why they matter
    🎧 NPR Politics Podcast: Our experts provide insights into what's happening
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • New suit alleges DHS illegally tracked observers

    Topline:

    Observers watching federal immigration enforcement in Maine who were told by agents they were "domestic terrorists" and would be added to a "database" or "watchlist" are now part of a new federal class action lawsuit.

    More details: The suit, filed by the legal nonprofit Protect Democracy and the law firms Dunn Isaacson Rhee and Drummond Woodsum, alleges federal agents are unconstitutionally retaliating against people who are lawfully observing and recording federal immigration enforcement operations by gathering their personal information and labeling them domestic terrorists.

    Why it matters: It is legal for observers to film and follow federal agents at a safe distance, Scarlet Kim, senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told NPR earlier this month. But dozens of people in Minnesota said in declarations collected by the ACLU that they were observing federal agents but were told they were impeding, interfering or acting illegally.

    Read on... for more about the lawsuit.

    Last month, Colleen Fagan was observing an immigration enforcement operation at an apartment complex in Portland, Maine, when federal agents scanned her face with a smartphone and appeared to record her car license plate number.

    In a social media video she recorded, Fagan can be heard asking why the agent was taking her information. What the agent said next made the video go viral.

    "Cause we have a nice little database," the masked agent said. "And now you're considered a domestic terrorist."

    Fagan, who is a social worker, has now joined a federal class action lawsuit that argues the Department of Homeland Security and a number of its sub-agencies are violating the First Amendment and are taking actions "designed to chill, suppress, and control speech that they do not like."

    "A federal agent called me a domestic terrorist just because I recorded agents operating in public in my community. But I have a right to do that, and so do others," Fagan said in a statement. "I want people to know how important it is to use our First Amendment rights to observe and document what is happening. Peaceful dissent is not a crime."

    Though Fagan's video went viral, her full name had not been widely publicized until this lawsuit.


    The suit, filed by the legal nonprofit Protect Democracy and the law firms Dunn Isaacson Rhee and Drummond Woodsum, alleges federal agents are unconstitutionally retaliating against people who are lawfully observing and recording federal immigration enforcement operations by gathering their personal information and labeling them domestic terrorists.

    "Plaintiffs must either abandon their constitutional rights or accept being cataloged and branded as 'domestic terrorists,'" reads the lawsuit, which was filed in federal district court in Maine on Monday. "That is a choice the Constitution does not require Plaintiffs, or anyone, to make."

    DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. DHS officials have denied the existence of a database of alleged domestic terrorists since Fagan's video was widely shared.

    "There is NO database of 'domestic terrorists' run by DHS," the agency's spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin (who has recently departed) told CNN last month about the video. "We do of course monitor and investigate and refer all threats, assaults and obstruction of our officers to the appropriate law enforcement. Obstructing and assaulting law enforcement is a felony and a federal crime."

    After federal agents fatally shot two U.S. citizens in Minnesota last month, DHS officials labeled both of them domestic terrorists in the immediate aftermath.

    Federal agents have access to facial recognition tools that can be used to identify people in the field, as well as the mobile app Mobile Companion, which allows agents to use a smartphone to scan license plates.

    These kinds of surveillance tools have allowed federal agents to intimidate observers and protesters by revealing they know their names and addresses, the lawsuit says. Several Minnesota observers who have followed federal agents in their cars have described the experience of agents leading them to their own homes to show they know where they live. The lawsuit names other Maine observers who have had the same experience.

    It is legal for observers to film and follow federal agents at a safe distance, Scarlet Kim, senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told NPR earlier this month. But dozens of people in Minnesota said in declarations collected by the ACLU that they were observing federal agents but were told they were impeding, interfering or acting illegally.

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said at a press conference in July that violence against DHS agents "is anything that threatens them and their safety," and went on to say that included "doxing them" and "videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations."

    DHS has crafted a wide definition of doxing. McLaughlin told The American Prospect in September that "videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents."

    A memo issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi in December lists "doxing" law enforcement as domestic terrorism.

    Elinor Hilton, another resident of Portland, Maine, is also listed as a plaintiff in the new lawsuit. Federal agents captured her face and license plate with their phones on Jan. 21, after she began recording them conducting an immigration enforcement operation at a Home Depot, the lawsuit says.

    She says one told her, "I hope you know that if you keep coming to things like this, you are going to be on a domestic terrorist watchlist. Then we're going to come to your house later tonight," according to the lawsuit.

    Hilton did not stay at her home that night for fear the agent would make good on the threat, the lawsuit says. She has reduced how often she observes federal agents and no longer uses her own car when she observes. She now parks her car several blocks away from her home and those of family members "out of concern that federal agents might recognize her car and trace it to her home." She says on a recent trip she left her personal phone at home out of concern that if she was placed on a government list, federal agents might detain her and search her phone.

    Fagan is concerned about being placed on a "no-fly" or similar list, the lawsuit says, and worries her current or future employment could be affected by any labels DHS gives her.

    Less than a week before Hilton's interaction with federal agents, Tom Homan, President Donald Trump's immigration adviser, told Fox News host Laura Ingraham that he wanted to create a "database" of people who impede ICE.

    "These people who want to say follow ICE and film ICE, you know what, you can protest, they have that right." Then he added that for those who cross a legal line, "We're going to create a database where those people that are arrested for interference, impeding, and assault, we're going to make them famous," Homan said. "We're going to put their face on TV. We're going to let their employers, in their neighborhoods, in their schools, know who these people are."

    But in other public appearances, federal officials have denied a database of protesters exists.

    At a congressional hearing earlier this month, U.S. Rep. Lou Correa (D-Calif.) asked Todd Lyons, acting director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to respond to what the federal agent in Maine said about "a little database" in the video Fagan recorded.

    "I can't speak for that individual, sir," Lyons said. "But I can assure you that there is no database that's tracking United States citizens."

    The lawsuit says, "If Defendants' denials are true—and the actions captured on video simply involved federal agents pretending to add observers to a database—then they are deliberately lying about domestic terrorist watchlists or databases to unlawfully intimidate observers."

    The lawsuit is asking a federal judge to stop DHS from collecting records on people and from "threatening, harassing, and otherwise retaliating against" them for exercising their protected first amendment rights, and to expunge records that have already been collected.

    JoAnna Suriani, counsel at Protect Democracy, said the lawsuit will "ensure that the federal government can no longer use unconstitutional surveillance tactics to silence its critics and sideline the observers who protect our communities."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • California governor's take on the political moment
    A white man with gray hair and blue suit jacket speaks into microphone, with 'All Things Considered' text overlay
    California Gov. Gavin Newsom sat down with NPR's "All Things Considered" for an interview ahead of the release of this memoir.

    Topline:

    Gavin Newsom, in his final year as governor of California, has been touring the country to energize voters ahead of the midterm elections.

    Why now: The governor sat down with NPR's All Things Considered for an interview ahead of the release of his memoir, Young Man in a Hurry. He discusses how his struggles with dyslexia shaped his childhood and career, his strategy for dealing with President Donald Trump, and how he thinks the Democratic party should meet this political moment.

    Keep reading... to watch the full interview.

    Watch the interview

    Gavin Newsom is in his final year as governor of California, but lately, he's been touring the country to energize voters ahead of the midterm elections.

    "I think it's really important for the Democratic Party not to give up on red states and rural parts of the country," he told NPR at an event organized by local Democrats in the town of Manning, South Carolina. Newsom is also widely considered a potential presidential candidate for 2028 — a possibility he has not ruled out — and he sees himself as a leader of Democratic opposition to President Donald Trump, often mocking his brash style on social media.

    "I'm putting a mirror up to President Trump and I'm fighting fire with fire and I am punching a bully back in the mouth," he told NPR.

    At the same time, Newsom has embraced conversations with major right-wing figures such as Steve Bannon and Ben Shapiro on his podcast, drawing criticism from members of his own party. The governor sat down with All Things Considered for an interview ahead of the release of his memoir, Young Man in a Hurry. He discusses how his struggles with dyslexia shaped his childhood and career, his strategy for dealing with President Trump, and how he thinks the Democratic party should meet this political moment.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Highs to reach around 80 degrees in some areas
    A man with dark skin wearing a black graphic t-shirt, black pants and white shoes rides an electric bike along a grassy path. A large black and white ship with three red and black smokestacks can be seen on the water in the background.
    It's late February but it feels like summer.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly sunny
    • Beaches: 69 to 74 degrees
    • Mountains: mid 60s to mid 70s at lower elevations
    • Inland: 76 to 81 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    What to expect: Plenty of warmth and sunshine all week long. Temperatures are expected to dip into the low to mid 80s this week.

    Read on ... for more details.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly sunny
    • Beaches: 69 to 74 degrees
    • Mountains: mid 60s to mid 70s at lower elevations
    • Inland: 76 to 81 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    Stop us if you've heard this one before...but it's going to feel a lot like summer this week as temperatures soar into the mid 80s.

    At the beaches, we're looking at high temperatures in the mid 70s. Meanwhile, downtown L.A. will see temperatures from the mid 70s up to 80 degrees.

    Similarly, the valleys and Inland Empire will be toasty, with highs from 75 to 82 degrees. Coachella Valley will be the warmest, with highs reaching up to 89 degrees.

    If you're planning for a hike, bring plenty of water — the Santa Monica Mountains will get into the low 80s.