Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Why Does California Still Not Have An Earthquake Early Warning System?
Despite its ever-present warnings about how we California residents should be prepared for “The Big One,” our state government has no desire to pay for an earthquake early-warning system that could potentially save thousands of lives. According to the L.A. Times, it is not “policy” to use money from the state’s general fund to build a early-warning system.
A trio of state legislators believes this is nonsense, arguing that the state has a responsibility to ensure the safety of its residents. Coming just hours after a M. 6.4 Earthquake killed at least 14 people in Taiwan, State Senators Jerry Hill, from San Mateo, and Bob Hertzberg, of Van Nuys, along with Assemblymember Adam Gray, released a statement saying that California needs to act sooner than later to build such a system using money from the state’s general fund.
A 2013 law prohibits the state from building a system using general fund money, instead requiring the state to rely on public-private partnerships. Those partnerships have stalled, according to the L.A. Times, but the Big One is still coming.
Building an early warning system is entirely possible. Countries like Japan, Taiwan, China, Turkey, and Mexico all have them in place, giving people crucial seconds to duck under a table or evacuate before an earthquake’s shockwaves hit. When a M 9.0 Earthquake struck Japan in 2011, Tokyo residents had almost 70 seconds of warning before the shockwaves hit.
Support for LAist comes from
A system in California is proposed to cost $23 million, with an additional annual upkeep of $12 million. Figuring in the $16 million already supplied from the federal government to build an early warning system, that cost falls further.
$23 million dollars is a paltry sum for the state, especially when contrasted with the tens of billions (68 precisely) of dollars the state has no problem spending on a high-speed rail corridor through California. Yet for reasons unknown, the state has been reluctant to commit to building a system that warns people about an impending earthquake.
The state legislative analyst predicts California will end the next fiscal year with a reserve of $11.5 billion.
“We should use a small fraction of that money to make a smart, one-time investment in a system that can improve public safety and save lives,” the legislators said in a statement. “We share Gov. Brown’s commitment to fiscal restraint. However, to not invest a small fraction of the overall state budget to implement the earthquake early warning system would be fiscally irresponsible.”
In terms of particulars, an early warning system for California works by blanketing the system with sensors that transmit a warning signal if they detect shaking. Seismic waves move at approximately the speed of sound, significantly slower than the speed modern communications technology functions.
The end goal is to have a system that can warn people almost instantly when an earthquake starts nearby through their smartphones, computers, and televisions. Ideally, people could use the time between receiving a warning signal to drop and cover or evacuate. At the same time, this signal could be used to alert emergency services, stop trains and motion, and open elevator doors to prevent people getting trapped inside.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity. -
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.
Best of LAist