Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
SeaWorld Sues California Over Ban On Breeding Captive Orcas
The Shamu show at SeaWorld (Photo by Josh Hallet via the Creative Commons)
()
SeaWorld is suing the California Coastal Commission over the agency's October decision to ban the theme park from breeding captive orcas.
The company filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in the San Diego Superior Court, arguing that they want the ban reversed and the Coastal Commission made a ruling that was outside of their authority, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune.
Over the summer, SeaWorld Entertainment proposed a $100 million Blue World Project for its San Diego park, one that would nearly double the capacity of the current orca habitat for its 11 killer whales. It would be increased to nearly 10 million gallons of water, and cover a total surface area of about 1.5 acres. In November, SeaWorld announced that it would be ending its killer whale shows in 2017 and replace them with an experience that would be "informative" and with a "conservation message inspiring people to act."
While the Coastal Commission approved the habitat expansion in October, they said it could only be done under the condition that SeaWorld no longer breed captive killer whales. The vote also prohibited the sale, transfer, or trade of captive orcas.
Support for LAist comes from
SeaWorld put the Blue World Project on hold, and vowed to challenge the ban, and that day has come.
"The Coastal Commission has neither the legal jurisdiction nor, accordingly, the expertise, to dictate the care, feeding or breeding of animals held solely in captivity under human care," according to the lawsuit, filed by the Los Angeles law firm of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, according to the L.A. Times.
The suit alleges that while the Coastal Commission can make decisions on projects that affect coastal and marine environment, they have no jurisdiction on how to care for marine animals in their park. "The orcas are not, in any way, part of the coastal or marine environment," according to the lawsuit. "All of SeaWorld's activities with respect to the care, breeding and transportation of orcas occur onshore in the orca pools and not in the marine environment and are specifically governed by federal law."
Coastal Commission spokeswoman Noaki Schwartz told the San Diego Union-Tribune that they haven't had time to review the suit yet, but the agency "stands by its decision in October to protect killer whales."
"It's clear that the company's primary intention in pursuing the Blue World Project was to breed more orcas to confine to tanks," PETA said in a statement.
Since the release of the 2013 documentary Blackfish, which was critical of SeaWorld keeping orcas in captivity, the company's stock and and attendance has dropped.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist