Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Officers Justified In Fatal Shooting Of Unarmed, Mentally Ill Man, LAPD Finds
Two police officers who shot and killed an unarmed, mentally ill man in August were justified in their use of force, say both the LAPD and the department's civilian watchdog.According to sources with knowledge of the case who spoke with the L.A. Times, investigators say there is evidence indicating Ezell Ford fought for one of the officer's weapons during the confrontation. However, the Police Commission, the civilian watchdog that has final say on all serious uses of force by LAPD officers, found fault in how the officers approached Ford before the shooting.
"Why didn't they just allow him to keep walking? He wasn't doing anything. He wasn't committing any crime. He wasn't bothering anybody," said Ford's mother, Tritobia, when the Times told her of the LAPD's and Police Commission's conclusions.
"He was minding his own business."
Department investigators found Ezell Ford's DNA on one of the officer's guns, suggesting he had fought for control of the weapon during the confrontation with Officers Sharlton Wampler and Antonio Villegas. Scratches were also found on Ford and Wampler's hands, along with Wampler's gun holster.
Support for LAist comes from
Although the Police Commission also found the shooting justified, Inspector General Bustamante's report says it is unclear whether both officers had enough justification to approach Ford and try to detain when he was walking down a South Los Angeles street on the night of August 11. When they reached Ford, Wampler placed his hand on him, which Bustamante says was unacceptable.
According to sources who spoke with the paper, both officers thought Ford was trying to dispose of narcotics as he was walking down the street. The LAPD has never officially said whether narcotics were found.
Police say after being approached by officers, the 24-year old Ford, who had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, got into a violent confrontation with the two officers and brought one of them down to the ground. During the struggle, Ford allegedly reached for the officer's gun.
Autopsy results found that Ford was shot three times by officers, including once in the back and once in the abdomen. The gunshot wound in his back had muzzle imprints, which suggested a shooting at close range.
Bustamante is expected to recommend that the officers be faulted for their tactics through the encounter. According to the L.A. Times, in cases where deadly force was found to be justified but the tactics were flawed, Chief Beck usually has the officers undergo retraining instead of being punished.
Both Bustamante and an LAPD spokesman declined to comment on the findings, pending the commission's ruling. The Police Commission is expected to discuss the situation on Tuesday.
Happening two days after the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, Ezell Ford's death became a local rallying cry against police killings.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity. -
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
Best of LAist