With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Officers Justified In Fatal Shooting Of Unarmed, Mentally Ill Man, LAPD Finds
Two police officers who shot and killed an unarmed, mentally ill man in August were justified in their use of force, say both the LAPD and the department's civilian watchdog.According to sources with knowledge of the case who spoke with the L.A. Times, investigators say there is evidence indicating Ezell Ford fought for one of the officer's weapons during the confrontation. However, the Police Commission, the civilian watchdog that has final say on all serious uses of force by LAPD officers, found fault in how the officers approached Ford before the shooting.
"Why didn't they just allow him to keep walking? He wasn't doing anything. He wasn't committing any crime. He wasn't bothering anybody," said Ford's mother, Tritobia, when the Times told her of the LAPD's and Police Commission's conclusions.
"He was minding his own business."
Department investigators found Ezell Ford's DNA on one of the officer's guns, suggesting he had fought for control of the weapon during the confrontation with Officers Sharlton Wampler and Antonio Villegas. Scratches were also found on Ford and Wampler's hands, along with Wampler's gun holster.
Support for LAist comes from
Although the Police Commission also found the shooting justified, Inspector General Bustamante's report says it is unclear whether both officers had enough justification to approach Ford and try to detain when he was walking down a South Los Angeles street on the night of August 11. When they reached Ford, Wampler placed his hand on him, which Bustamante says was unacceptable.
According to sources who spoke with the paper, both officers thought Ford was trying to dispose of narcotics as he was walking down the street. The LAPD has never officially said whether narcotics were found.
Police say after being approached by officers, the 24-year old Ford, who had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, got into a violent confrontation with the two officers and brought one of them down to the ground. During the struggle, Ford allegedly reached for the officer's gun.
Autopsy results found that Ford was shot three times by officers, including once in the back and once in the abdomen. The gunshot wound in his back had muzzle imprints, which suggested a shooting at close range.
Bustamante is expected to recommend that the officers be faulted for their tactics through the encounter. According to the L.A. Times, in cases where deadly force was found to be justified but the tactics were flawed, Chief Beck usually has the officers undergo retraining instead of being punished.
Both Bustamante and an LAPD spokesman declined to comment on the findings, pending the commission's ruling. The Police Commission is expected to discuss the situation on Tuesday.
Happening two days after the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, Ezell Ford's death became a local rallying cry against police killings.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
Best of LAist