Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Health Experts Don't Buy Into L.A.'s E-Cigarette Ban
(Photo by Marc Bruxelle via Shutterstock.
()
The L.A. City Council's unanimous vote for far-reaching regulations on e-cigarettes, while not in effect just yet, sends a message that vapes can be just as bad as real cigarettes. But some health experts think L.A.'s reasons for passing these brand new regulations are bunk.
The proposal approved today, which just needs one signature from Mayor Garcetti to become law, effectively bans vaping in private businesses, as well as public areas such as beaches and parks. This is something that doesn't sit well with one health expert.
"To justify banning vaping in private businesses, there needs to be solid scientific evidence that secondhand vapor is harmful to bystanders," Dr. Michael Siegel, a professor of public health at Boston University, told LAist. "However, there is currently no evidence that 'passive vaping' poses any substantial public health risks. Thus, I do not believe that the L.A. legislation is justified."
Indeed, Dr. Igor Burstyn of Drexel University found that there wasn't really a high danger for second-hand smoke from vape usage.
Support for LAist comes from
Vapes are considered by many to be a better alternative to regular cigarettes because the nicotine-laced vapor comes from water and is tar-less. Many people who are trying to curb their smoking habit have turned to vapes to wean them off of cigarettes. This position is taken by former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Richard Carmona, who penned an op-ed in the Daily News about why e-cigarettes need to remain unregulated:
A well-intentioned but scientifically unsupported effort like the current proposal could greatly impede the effort to defeat tobacco smoking. This regulation, if passed, would disincentivize smokers from switching to e-cigarettes, since many initially switch for reasons of convenience. It would also send the unintended message to smokers that e-cigarettes are as dangerous as tobacco smoking, with the result that many will simply continue to smoke their current toxic products.
On the other side of the spectrum, county health director Dr. Jonathan Fielding sees unregulated vapes as nothing more than an opportunity for smoking to increase.
"We have made such progress over the years, where smoking is down to about 13 percent, and it would be a shame to reverse that," Fielding told the Daily News. "We recognize that some say (e-cigarettes) help them quit smoking, but the strength of scientific evidence to get smokers to quit is not there."
Mayor Garcetti has ten days to sign or veto the ordinance, and if he does, it will take roughly 41 days to go into effect, the L.A. Weekly says. So this means that vape aficionados have only until mid-April to use their e-cigarettes wherever they want.
Enjoy it while it lasts.
Related:
L.A. Moves Forward On Proposal To Treat E-Cigs Like Regular Cigs
Unregulated, Addictive, And Enticing: E-Cigarettes Suck In Smokers But Risks Remain
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity. -
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
Best of LAist