Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Family Of Man Killed In Skid Row Shooting By Police Suing LAPD And L.A.

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

The family of an unarmed and mentally-ill homeless man who was fatally shot by LAPD officers on Skid Row filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the department and the city of Los Angeles today.

They're saying that the shooting death of 43-year-old Charly Keunang by the hands of police on March 1 was "a classic case of abuse of power and deadly force," according to the Associated Press.

The family said in a statement: "Six trained and fully-armed police officers initiated a conflict and shot Keunang six times in the unnecessary struggle that ensued."

The shooting was recorded a bystander who posted the video to Facebook. It quickly went viral. The video shows several LAPD officers attempting to wrestle Keunang to the ground. It's not clear in the clip what happens towards the end of the scuffle, but there's the sound of a Taser being used. Shots are fired, and then Keunang's body goes limp.

Support for LAist comes from

Though LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck argued that Keunang grabbed an officer's gun, leading officers to shoot him, Keunang's family says that another video taken from an officer's bodycam shows something different. Police have refused to release the bodycam footage to the public, arguing that the investigation is still underway. However, the family says in the lawsuit that GQ writer Jeff Sharlet was allowed to see the video, and in an article published last month, he wrote about a rookie officer named Joshua Volasgis, whom the LAPD never identified:

In the video the public sees, a glint of sun on a squad car, reflected light dissecting the scene, and Volasgis, shouting, "He has my gun! He has my gun!" Charly does not have the gun, of this there is no question. He may have reached for it. His arm may have convulsed. He may have never come near.

A source told the L.A. Times that the gun was still in the officer's holster after they shot and killed Keunang.

The family also says eyewitness accounts contradict the LAPD's story. "At no time did Mr. Keunang possess any type of weapon, much less fire or remove any firearm from the officers," the lawsuit says.

Police say the whole ordeal started because they thought Keunang was a robbery suspect, though the lawsuit argues something different: that another homeless man made a 9-1-1 call to report an argument with Keunang, according to the AP.

The family's lawsuit is seeking for damages for wrongful death, negligence and civil rights violations. Aside from the LAPD and the City of Los Angeles, it also names Beck and officers Chang Syed, Francisco Martinez, Daniel Torres and Volasgis in the lawsuit. Though the family is asking for an unspecified amount, the Times reports that an earlier claim was asking for $20 million.

The LAPD Force Investigation Division, LAPD Inspector General and LA District Attorney are investigating the shooting.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist