Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Personal Responsibility
()
A trend is finally catching on that holds employees personally responsible for their health care premiums. Basically, the healthier you are, the less you’ll pay. Car insurance has worked this way for decades. Get a speeding ticket and points are added to your record, and insurance carriers can justify a premium increase. An increase that’s not absorbed by everyone else who drives.
There’s always been a lingering question about health care. Why should a healthy person pay more to subsidize someone who smokes, who’s obese or who’s an alcoholic? Is health care really an equal, universal right? Does anyone need to bear personal accountability for anything anymore? The fundamental problem is that the bad habits of one group creates significant financial consequences for others.
The National Coalition on Health Care states that health care spending will climb to over $2 trillion this year. That’s more than the gross domestic product of many countries (for example, almost 8 times that of Switzerland). Over 60% of Americans are overweight or obese, and fast food restaurants dwell at every corner. LA Councilwoman Jan Perry is even trying to stop new fast food restaurants from opening in South LA for two years to address related health problems. The reality of American life is that fatty foods are cheap, easy and convenient and exercise can be hard to come by between our longer work schedules and increasingly busier personal lives. Is that the reality or just an excuse?
Support for LAist comes from
With anything controversial, and believe me, this reeks of controversy, lawsuits won't be far behind. However, they might not be as easy to file as you think. The National Workrights Institute feels that employers are taking an unfair approach to "eliminate" expensive employees. But this is a capitalistic society, after all. Why should an employer suffer exorbitant costs as a result of their employees' unhealthy lifestyles? Our trusty federal government passed regulations in July to address employers' legal concerns, detailing how these "wellness programs" differentiate themselves from illegal discrimination based on the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. One stipulation is that penalties and rewards cannot exceed 20% of an employee's health care cost. Another takes into account pre-existing health factors that sometimes lead to obesity or high blood pressure, etc. ("no fault of their own" factors).
The one thing a lot people overlook about this is the bottom line, but not for financial departments. I'm talking about a person's bottom line...The state of their health. Whether you think it's a good idea or unfair or bordering on tyranny, the ultimate drive is to make people healthier. Employers would much rather have healthy workers than unhealthy workers paying surcharges. And when you're healthier, you feel better, you live longer, you're more productive and you won't require multiple bypasses. Isn't that a good thing?
photo by una cierta mirada via Flickr
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance. -
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
Best of LAist