With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Only in L.A.: Angelenos Discuss Condoms in Porn on Twitter

This election year, many Americans all over the country find themselves waiting in grueling, monotonous polling lines to exercise their voting rights. Meanwhile in Los Angeles, listed somewhere below the slot for the presidential race is Measure B, an initiative that seeks to make mandatory the use of condoms in porn. Whether or not the initiative will have any pervasive effect on L.A. if passed, Angelenos are surely getting a kick out of the fact that the measure is even on their ballots.
Twitter has been blowing up with their responses lately:
Weird that this LA measure for condoms in porn doesn't stipulate "unless performers are in a committed, loving relationship built on trust."
— Emily Maya Mills (@emilymayamills) November 6, 2012
In my first election ever, I will be voting on the very serious issue of whether or not porn stars should have to wear condoms. #nojoke
— Jacqueline Emerson (@jackie_emerson) November 6, 2012
Los Angeles. This is the most important election of our lifetime please please please vote no on condoms in porn.
— Moshe Kasher (@moshekasher) November 6, 2012
Condoms in porn? More like Prop B(onerkill)
— Mike Leffingwell (@mikeleffingwell) November 6, 2012
Today is a big day in California: We get to vote if our porn stars should wear condoms or not. #VOTE
— Chris Franjola (@ChrisFranjola) November 6, 2012
In CA we not only voted for the president but also we voted on whether porn stars should be required to wear condoms in movies. #america
— carina adly mackenzie (@cadlymack) November 6, 2012
Kind of amazing a few pages down from the presidential vote in sample ballot there's 6 pages debating mandatory condoms in porn.
— ⚑ (@AJTWEETS) October 31, 2012
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.
-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
-
This is the one time you can do this legally!
-
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”
-
While working for the county, the DA’s office alleges that 13 employees fraudulently filed for unemployment, claiming to earn less than $600 a week.