Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Manson Murderer Leslie Van Houten Denied Parole For The 21st Time

A woman with light-tone skin has large eyes and dark hair cut in a shag cut. She's in the back of a car.
Leslie Van Houten leaving court in 1977. (Photo from the Herald-Examiner Collection, via the Los Angeles Public Library Photo Collection)
()

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today. 


Leslie Van Houten, the Manson Family member who was convicted of the 1969 murders of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca, has been denied parole for the 21st time.Governor Jerry Brown explained in a statement his decision to deny parole, writing, "Both [Van Houten's] role in these extraordinarily brutal crimes and her inability to explain her willing participation in such horrific violence cannot be overlooked and lead me to believe she remains an unreasonable risk to society if released," per Rolling Stone.

Brown continued, saying, "it remains unclear how and why Van Houten drastically transformed from an exceptionally smart, driven young woman, class secretary and homecoming princess, to a member of one of the most notorious cults in history."

For those who need a refresher, Van Houten, the youngest member of the Family at 19, accompanied several other Manson followers to the home of the LaBiancas in Los Feliz on August 9, 1969. She testified that she held down Rosemary LaBianca as Watson stabbed her, before stabbing the woman herself. Investigators found that Rosemary had been stabbed more than 40 times, though Van Houten has repeatedly claimed to have only stabbed her after she was already dead. (If you want much, much more, we highly recommend the enthralling 10-part series chronicling the Manson murders on the podcast "You Must Remember This".)

NBC L.A. reports that Brown came to the decision after L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey wrote a 5-page letter to him in which she wrote that Van Houten "lacks insight, genuine remorse and an understanding of the magnitude of her crimes."

Support for LAist comes from

In April, the state parole board recommended that Van Houten receive parole, a decision based, according to the L.A. Times, on Van Houten's youth at the time of the crime, lack of previous violent crime as an adult, her length of incarceration, and her "spotless" record in prison: while in jail, Van Houten has earned both a bachelor's and master's degree, and runs self-help groups.

But, as Brown said in his statement, her perceived lack of remorse is reason enough to deny parole yet again. "Even two years after the murders, when interviewed by a psychologist, Van Houten admitted that, although she had no present desire to kill anyone, she would have no difficulty doing it again," read the statement.

Richard Pfeiffer, Van Houten's attorney, told the Times that he believed there was a reason for his client's "slide" into a life that was overtaken by the Family (and therefore, encouraged to murder): After her parent's nasty divorce, she was cast out from her wholesome group of friends and got pregnant. Her mother forced her to have an illegal abortion, and buried the fetus in their backyard. Her drug use—LSD, particularly—escalated.

"Tell me that wouldn't screw anybody up," he said.

Here she is being interviewed by Larry King:

Related:
Where Are Manson's Children Now?
Manson Family Member Apparently Wants His Wikipedia Page Edited

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist