Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Manson Murderer Leslie Van Houten Denied Parole For The 21st Time

A woman with light-tone skin has large eyes and dark hair cut in a shag cut. She's in the back of a car.
Leslie Van Houten leaving court in 1977. (Photo from the Herald-Examiner Collection, via the Los Angeles Public Library Photo Collection)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.


Leslie Van Houten, the Manson Family member who was convicted of the 1969 murders of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca, has been denied parole for the 21st time.Governor Jerry Brown explained in a statement his decision to deny parole, writing, "Both [Van Houten's] role in these extraordinarily brutal crimes and her inability to explain her willing participation in such horrific violence cannot be overlooked and lead me to believe she remains an unreasonable risk to society if released," per Rolling Stone.

Brown continued, saying, "it remains unclear how and why Van Houten drastically transformed from an exceptionally smart, driven young woman, class secretary and homecoming princess, to a member of one of the most notorious cults in history."

For those who need a refresher, Van Houten, the youngest member of the Family at 19, accompanied several other Manson followers to the home of the LaBiancas in Los Feliz on August 9, 1969. She testified that she held down Rosemary LaBianca as Watson stabbed her, before stabbing the woman herself. Investigators found that Rosemary had been stabbed more than 40 times, though Van Houten has repeatedly claimed to have only stabbed her after she was already dead. (If you want much, much more, we highly recommend the enthralling 10-part series chronicling the Manson murders on the podcast "You Must Remember This".)

NBC L.A. reports that Brown came to the decision after L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey wrote a 5-page letter to him in which she wrote that Van Houten "lacks insight, genuine remorse and an understanding of the magnitude of her crimes."

In April, the state parole board recommended that Van Houten receive parole, a decision based, according to the L.A. Times, on Van Houten's youth at the time of the crime, lack of previous violent crime as an adult, her length of incarceration, and her "spotless" record in prison: while in jail, Van Houten has earned both a bachelor's and master's degree, and runs self-help groups.

But, as Brown said in his statement, her perceived lack of remorse is reason enough to deny parole yet again. "Even two years after the murders, when interviewed by a psychologist, Van Houten admitted that, although she had no present desire to kill anyone, she would have no difficulty doing it again," read the statement.

Richard Pfeiffer, Van Houten's attorney, told the Times that he believed there was a reason for his client's "slide" into a life that was overtaken by the Family (and therefore, encouraged to murder): After her parent's nasty divorce, she was cast out from her wholesome group of friends and got pregnant. Her mother forced her to have an illegal abortion, and buried the fetus in their backyard. Her drug use—LSD, particularly—escalated.

Sponsored message

"Tell me that wouldn't screw anybody up," he said.

Here she is being interviewed by Larry King:

Related:
Where Are Manson's Children Now?
Manson Family Member Apparently Wants His Wikipedia Page Edited

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right