Today is Giving Tuesday!

Give back to local trustworthy news; your gift's impact will go twice as far for LAist because it's matched dollar for dollar on this special day. 
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

L.A. Faces Another Lawsuit For Playa Del Rey 'Road Diet'

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

A group of Manhattan Beach and Playa del Rey residents are suing the City of Los Angeles for allegedly breaking the law when implementing a "road diet" in Playa del Rey this summer, which removed traffic lanes on several major thoroughfares and increased commute times twofold.

The L.A. Times reports that the residents claim the city broke state law by removing the lanes without conducting a thorough environmental review. This is the second lawsuit filed against the city in response to the lane reduction; the first, filed early in July, which made the same case, and came from a group of homeowners whose condominium development is only accessible via the roads that underwent the "diet."

The "road diet," an attempt to reduce traffic deaths and accidents, came as response to a wrongful death lawsuit prompted by a 16-year-old's death while crossing the busy street to reach her parked car. It also falls into Mayor Garcetti's "Vision Zero" plan, which is a city-wide effort to reduce traffic deaths to zero by 2025 (a plan that, in its first year, saw deaths rise 43%). Immediately after implementation, the "diet" faced intense community backlash. Opponents claim traffic becomes more dangerous because the diet leads drivers onto residential streets to avoid congestion. Despite Councilman Mike Bonin's support for the project in his Westside district, he reversed opinion and announced he would restore the lanes by the end of the summer. Since his announcement, city officials confirmed the lanes would be open by August 21, according to the L.A. Times.

The lawsuit claims the decision to remove the lanes without public input and without conducting a review of potential effects on congestion is a "gross abuse of discretion." It demands the lanes be restored (a demand which, as Bonin announced, is already underway) and that future projects include environmental reviews. The lawsuit was filed by the recently-formed non-profit Keep L.A. Moving. The group released a statement following the announcement of the lawsuit, arguing the road diet worsened traffic accidents and lowered revenue for many local businesses (Streetsblog says that several of the group's claims are inaccurate). The residents called the road diet "an egregious misappropriation of public funds," citing Councilman Mike Bonin's plan to devote 60% of Measure M funds to Vision Zero projects. Streetsblog mentions that the Measure M sales tax increase didn't go into effect until July 1st, while the road diet was implemented in late May.

Sponsor

The lawsuit also claims support for the project came from "outside, paid supporters to make it appear that local residents were overwhelmingly supporting the projects."

The community backlash to the "road diet" paints a rocky portrait for implementation of future Vision Zero projects. Vision Zero's future was in danger back in May, when the L.A. City Council almost didn't include it in the year's budget, but funding pulled through in the final hour. Councilman Bonin was one of the most prominent supporters of keeping the initiative funded.

At LAist, we focus on what matters to our community: clear, fair, and transparent reporting that helps you make decisions with confidence and keeps powerful institutions accountable.

Today, on Giving Tuesday, your support for independent local news is critical. With federal funding for public media gone, LAist faces a $1.7 million yearly shortfall. Speaking frankly, how much reader support we receive now will determine the strength of this reliable source of local information now and for years to come.

This work is only possible with community support. Every investigation, service guide, and story is made possible by people like you who believe that local news is a public good and that everyone deserves access to trustworthy local information.

That’s why on this Giving Tuesday, we’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Thank you for understanding how essential it is to have an informed community and standing up for free press.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right