Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. Faces Another Lawsuit For Playa Del Rey 'Road Diet'
A group of Manhattan Beach and Playa del Rey residents are suing the City of Los Angeles for allegedly breaking the law when implementing a "road diet" in Playa del Rey this summer, which removed traffic lanes on several major thoroughfares and increased commute times twofold.
The L.A. Times reports that the residents claim the city broke state law by removing the lanes without conducting a thorough environmental review. This is the second lawsuit filed against the city in response to the lane reduction; the first, filed early in July, which made the same case, and came from a group of homeowners whose condominium development is only accessible via the roads that underwent the "diet."
The "road diet," an attempt to reduce traffic deaths and accidents, came as response to a wrongful death lawsuit prompted by a 16-year-old's death while crossing the busy street to reach her parked car. It also falls into Mayor Garcetti's "Vision Zero" plan, which is a city-wide effort to reduce traffic deaths to zero by 2025 (a plan that, in its first year, saw deaths rise 43%). Immediately after implementation, the "diet" faced intense community backlash. Opponents claim traffic becomes more dangerous because the diet leads drivers onto residential streets to avoid congestion. Despite Councilman Mike Bonin's support for the project in his Westside district, he reversed opinion and announced he would restore the lanes by the end of the summer. Since his announcement, city officials confirmed the lanes would be open by August 21, according to the L.A. Times.
The lawsuit claims the decision to remove the lanes without public input and without conducting a review of potential effects on congestion is a "gross abuse of discretion." It demands the lanes be restored (a demand which, as Bonin announced, is already underway) and that future projects include environmental reviews. The lawsuit was filed by the recently-formed non-profit Keep L.A. Moving. The group released a statement following the announcement of the lawsuit, arguing the road diet worsened traffic accidents and lowered revenue for many local businesses (Streetsblog says that several of the group's claims are inaccurate). The residents called the road diet "an egregious misappropriation of public funds," citing Councilman Mike Bonin's plan to devote 60% of Measure M funds to Vision Zero projects. Streetsblog mentions that the Measure M sales tax increase didn't go into effect until July 1st, while the road diet was implemented in late May.
The lawsuit also claims support for the project came from "outside, paid supporters to make it appear that local residents were overwhelmingly supporting the projects."
The community backlash to the "road diet" paints a rocky portrait for implementation of future Vision Zero projects. Vision Zero's future was in danger back in May, when the L.A. City Council almost didn't include it in the year's budget, but funding pulled through in the final hour. Councilman Bonin was one of the most prominent supporters of keeping the initiative funded.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.