One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LAPD Revises Use-Of-Force Policy With An Eye Toward De-Escalation
(Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)
On Tuesday, the Los Angeles Police Commission approved a revised use-of-force policy that favors de-escalation over use of deadly force. The new policy requires officers to try and de-escalate situations using non-lethal force whenever possible before firing their guns.
According to the L.A. Times, the revised policy represents "a major step" in the department's goal of lowering the number of police shootings, which has been the focus of a nearly two-year long campaign. More specifically, the updated policy adds in the following wording to the preamble of the department's use-of-force policy: "officers shall attempt to control an incident by using time, distance, communications and available resources in an effort to de-escalate the situation, whenever it is safe and reasonable to do so.''
De-escalation tactics and less-than-lethal force have already been a part of LAPD training. Revising the official policy to explicitly state that officers should aim for de-escalation whenever possible is significant because it could hypothetically be taken into account when an officer is facing a disciplinary action following a shooting. The amended policy has the backing of the police union that represents the LAPD's more than 8,000 rank-and-file members, according to the Daily News.
City News Services reports that some activists raised concerns over the lack of specificity in the new language, which doesn't include a more detailed breakdown of preferred de-escalation techniques. The ACLU also expressed concerns that the new policy did not explicitly state that de-escalate would be considered when determining whether an officer's use of force was reasonable, according to the Times.
The revised policy, which was also supported by LAPD Chief Charlie Beck and Mayor Eric Garcetti, was approved in a 5-0 vote.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
