Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. To Ask Voters For $1.2 Billion For Homeless Housing In November
Shelter from the storm (Photo by Mikey Wally via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
()
As a part of its plan to mitigate homelessness in Los Angeles, the L.A. City Council wants to build roughly 10,000 units of "supportive housing," explicitly designated for getting homeless people people off the streets and under a roof. This, of course, is very pricey, and is expected to cost L.A. roughly $1.2 billion.
Earlier this week, the L.A. City Council approved a pair of potential revenue streams that would, once finalized, be used to fund construction of those 10,000 units, according to KPCC The two choices will eventually be narrowed to one, which will, in turn, be placed on the November ballot for voter approval. If two-thirds of Los Angeles city voters approve the proposition, it will become law.
To pay for the construction, the city is proposing either a general obligation bond or a property parcel tax, according to KABC. Though city lawmakers haven't yet decided on which funding measure they'll actually float to voters this November, the deadline to submit ballot resolutions comes just a few days from now on July 1. Essentially, the city needs to establish an official record of both proposed funding sources now, even though only one will eventually be submitted for voter approval.
The first proposal would authorize the city to sell bonds as it needs to in order to build the housing. Money to pay off the bonds would come from a property tax based on a property's assessed value. That tax would cost property owners roughly $17.54 per $100,000 of their land's assessed price. Landlords would be allowed to pass the cost on to both commercial and residential tenants, except those protected by rent-control.
Support for LAist comes from
Alternatively, municipal policymakers are considering a tax based on the size of a person's home. Though the city hasn't established a specific rate yet, that tax would most likely be about 4-cents per square foot of a property's 'improvements.' The end goal is to generate about $90 million in annual revenue.
One of these two proposals will be on the November ballot, albeit potentially tweaked from their current specifics. The city council voted 14-0 to move both proposals forward. Mitch Englander was absent from the vote, according to the Daily News.
Though all the lawmakers voted in favor of the proposals, it's no secret that many councilmembers view the city-based proposals as inherently limited.
For example, Councilmember Jose Huizar, who represents much of central and downtown L.A., thinks an approach to fighting homelessness must come with greater regional support.
"The county and the state have much better access to federal funds," he said, to KPCC. "I think overall this is the best we can do."
A county-proposed "millionaire's tax" to fight homelessness stalled after Governor Brown failed to indicate his support for the measure.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity. -
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
Best of LAist