One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. Mom Gives Up Naming Rights to Unborn Child for $5000 Cash Prize [UPDATED]
Photo by karen roach via Shutterstock
Naming a child is a big deal--after all, they're pretty much stuck with it for the rest of their lives. But one Los Angeles mom-to-be is fine with letting the public pick her baby's name, in exchange for a $5000 cash prize she won in an online contest.
Natasha Hill entered Belly Ballot's contest, and submitted her application to let "the entire world" have a say in her baby's name.
The Belly Ballot site was launched in 2012, and offers parents-to-be a platform where they can post ideas for baby names and have people vote on them.
Natasha Hill (Facebook)
Hill's win was revealed mid-February, and the 26-year-old UC Santa Barbara grad quickly took to her Facebook page to share her glee, posting "Yeahhhh I won!!!"According to the popular parenting site Baby Center, Hill said in her entry "she would spend half the money on credit card debt, and the rest would go into a college fund for her new baby." (Incidentally, a lot of the moms commenting on the Baby Center post say they think $5000 is "cheap" for what Hill is giving up.)
Hill announced she was expecting in late January, and says while she doesn't want to know the sex before birth, she's already been trying to come up with names.
Of course, now that's pretty much out of her hands, while (a mere) $5000 is in her pocket.
Sponsored message
Belly Ballot explains what happens next:
In the coming days, we will create Natasha’s Belly Ballot and prepare the open voting to commence on March 18th and continue through March 22nd. We will select a number of currently trending names, and names sponsored by our Advertisers, to be listed on the ballot. Anyone will be free to vote for 1 girl name and 1 boy name each (only 1 vote will count per person for each though). The girl and boy name with the most votes when the ballot concludes on March 22nd will be the name Natasha will name her baby!
“I think the whole Belly Ballot concept is so social and fun, and can’t wait to see what everyone votes for!” Hill said.
This could also prove to be horrifying, since advertisers have a say and people also have questionable taste (and spelling skills) when it comes to current names. If you've ever talked about baby naming, you've probably heard an earful of cringe-worthy selections, including those with gratuitous punctuation marks and extra letters...you know, so the name can be unique. How about La-A, which, of course, is pronounced "ladasha" or Abcd, pronounced "abscidee"? And thanks to shows like "Teen Mom," our future country will be run by a slew of men named Jace and Bentley.
Just a few interesting name selections that moms-to-be have floated around online forums in recent months include Brexley, Maddix, Racein, Tonto, Desire, Aunianna, E'yanna, Rayleighana Mayleek, Kaydence, Swayze, Chenayah, King, Krue, and Skyleiah, to name a few. And, depending on the advertisers, the baby could be called any imaginable product name. Did we mention the contest was called "Belly Branding"? Based on the site's banner ad, there's a good chance Hill's offspring could be named Megabus or Country Outfitter.
Oh, baby.
UPDATE 3/4/13: The Belly Ballot site's owner has now admitted no one entered the contest, and that she hired L.A. actress Natasha Lloyd to play "Natasha Hill" the "winner." Lloyd is not pregnant.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
