This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A.'s Red Light Enforcement Cameras 'Not Necessarily' at Most Dangerous Intersections
Photo by Zach Behrens/LAist
How effective is Los Angeles' Photo Red Light Program? That's the question City Controller Wendy Greuel will be talking about at a press conference later this morning. The enforcement cameras, which record drivers who will eventually receive a ticket in the mail running red lights, are supposed to improve public safety by reducing accidents at the city's highest risk intersections.
Greuel's office, however, said the city's 32 cameras have "not necessarily" been installed at those dangerous intersections, instead making sure there was at least one camera per city council district -- read: politics, mini fiefdoms -- instead of putting them at some state-controlled locations that require additional analysis before a camera can go live.
The good news is that there have been no fatalities at camera-controlled intersections since 2006 when they first began popping up in Los Angeles, but traffic accidents overall only decreased at half of those intersections.
The City currently has 32 Photo Red Light cameras, whose primary purpose is to improve public safety, by reducing accidents at the City’s highest risk intersections. Still, Greuel's audit concluded that a better and more comprehensive approach to evaluating the program was needed because an increase in public safety could not be proven with current methods.
Despite doubling income with the cameras in 2009, $2.6 million has been spent supporting the cameras over the last two years without full cost recovery.
Sponsored message
Related: City Wants to Lower Red Light Camera Fines & Reap Higher Revenues at the Same Time
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
