Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

City Wants to Lower Red Light Camera Fines & Reap Higher Revenues at the Same Time

sign_red_light_photo.jpg
Photo by TheTruthAbout... via Flickr

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

A state senate bill making its way through Sacramento has ruffled the feathers of some Los Angeles politicians. SB 949, authored by Senator Jenny Oropeza of Long Beach, would strip a local municipalities right to enact moving violations penalties, as provided in the California Vehicle Code. But with the current law, according to Councilman Dennis Zine who opposes Oropeza's legislation, it allows Los Angeles to lower the fine for running a red light intersection enforced by camera while collecting higher revenues for the city.

Currently, of over-$500 fine, the city only sees $150 because part of the money goes to the county and state. "By changing the citation process for photo red light and other traffic violations, the City could reduce fine amounts to reasonable levels for motorists while increasing the City's net revenue from these citations," Zine wrote in a resolution opposing the bill, which will go before the full City Council today.

Furthermore, he and Council President Eric Garcetti contend that cities should see the benefits, "particularly when local agencies are providing the enforcement mechanisms and equipment to enforce important traffic laws and issue violations," according to a city analysis (.pdf).

But "Senator Oropeza has stated that allowing a confusing patchwork of enforcement practices robs the state of resources for transportation," that analysis of the bill found. "She also states that tickets issued under local regulations are not reported to the California Department of Motor Vehicles or the driver's insurance company, which would inhibit the State's ability to identify unsafe drivers and calculate insurance rates."

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today