Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

City Wants to Lower Red Light Camera Fines & Reap Higher Revenues at the Same Time

sign_red_light_photo.jpg
Photo by TheTruthAbout... via Flickr

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

A state senate bill making its way through Sacramento has ruffled the feathers of some Los Angeles politicians. SB 949, authored by Senator Jenny Oropeza of Long Beach, would strip a local municipalities right to enact moving violations penalties, as provided in the California Vehicle Code. But with the current law, according to Councilman Dennis Zine who opposes Oropeza's legislation, it allows Los Angeles to lower the fine for running a red light intersection enforced by camera while collecting higher revenues for the city.

Currently, of over-$500 fine, the city only sees $150 because part of the money goes to the county and state. "By changing the citation process for photo red light and other traffic violations, the City could reduce fine amounts to reasonable levels for motorists while increasing the City's net revenue from these citations," Zine wrote in a resolution opposing the bill, which will go before the full City Council today.

Furthermore, he and Council President Eric Garcetti contend that cities should see the benefits, "particularly when local agencies are providing the enforcement mechanisms and equipment to enforce important traffic laws and issue violations," according to a city analysis (.pdf).

But "Senator Oropeza has stated that allowing a confusing patchwork of enforcement practices robs the state of resources for transportation," that analysis of the bill found. "She also states that tickets issued under local regulations are not reported to the California Department of Motor Vehicles or the driver's insurance company, which would inhibit the State's ability to identify unsafe drivers and calculate insurance rates."

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today