Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Food

Trader Joe's Is Cutting Insurance For Part Time Employees

traderjoesyo.jpg
Photo by Dennis S Hurd on Flickr

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Looks like some of Trader Joe's crew members might be ready to throw their captain overboard right about now. The home-grown chain, which started here in SoCal in 1958, has decided to cut their health insurance offerings to their part time employees.

The nautical-themed grocer, which originally was launched as a convenience store competitor to 7-11 called Pronto Markets, has traditionally offered workers health insurance plans. But now they're cutting those out and giving employees a $500 stipend to help them pay for packages under Obamacare.

Under Obamacare aka the Affordable Care Act, companies with at least 50 workers are required to offer health coverage to employees who log 30 hours or more per week. Trader Joe's used to offer employees working less than 30 hours per week company-based coverage, but those offerings for part-timers are long gone.

In a piece in HuffPo, Trader Joe's responded to the the outcry from the public and their employees, saying that the majority of their employees would be better off with this new plan. They say that only folks who wouldn't fare well are those who have spouses and joint incomes that are higher than their own.

Says HuffPo:

People who have additional income from their spouses or other jobs will see more modest subsidies or perhaps no subsidies at all. In that case, they'll lose their Trader Joe's coverage and find only more costly alternatives on their own. The company offered an extreme case -- a worker whose spouse earns $200,000 -- while, in reality, a family earning a good deal less than that may lose out on Obamacare subsidies.

This is all concerning for many of the employees that worked at the grocer for their robust insurance offerings. And TJ's has also recently cut employees' retirement plans. Looks like there's trouble in tropical paradise.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today