One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
ScarJo Splits With Oxfam Over West Bank SodaStream Situation
Scarlett Johansson (cinemafestival / Shutterstock.com)
If there's one thing people love to get riled up over, it's soda and politics. Only this time, it's got nothing to do with taxes and everything to do with ScarJo's role as a spokeswoman for SodaStream.
ScarJo's racy Super Bowl commercial originally got some heat because it directly called out competitors Coke and Pepsi. But things bubbled up further when Oxfam saw her support of the company, which is currently operating out of controversial Israeli settlements on the West Bank, as a conflict of interest. So today, ScarJo resigned from her role at the nonprofit.
Oxfam accepted the 29-year-old actress' resignation, stating that they believed her role as a spokesperson for SodaStream was "incompatible" with her role as an Oxfam global ambassador.
According to the Times, Johansson defended her work with SodaStream saying she remains "a supporter of economic cooperation and social interaction between a democratic Israel and Palestine,"
That didn't cut it for Oxfam though. The organization issued a statement saying, "Oxfam believes that businesses, such as SodaStream, that operate in settlements further the ongoing poverty and denial of rights of the Palestinian communities that we work to support ... which is opposed to all trade from Israeli settlements and deems them illegal under international law."
You can watch the original video below.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
