Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Food

Monsanto Heads to Court to Defend GMOs and Seed Patents

monsantaoseeds.jpg
Photo by tonrulkens on Flickr

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your tax-deductible donation now.

Today, the case of Bowman vs. Monsanto Co. will be brought to the Supreme Court, deciding who is right when it comes to seed patent law.

Monsanto is claiming that they have exclusive rights over products that by their very nature self-replicate. The corporation is suing 75-year old farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman, claiming that his soybean crops, which were produced via the age-old tradition of seed saving, are a patent infringement. (You might remember a similar case being mentioned in the film Food Inc., which you can watch here.)

The process of seed exchange, saving and breeding has been a part of farm culture since its inception. But the corporation wants to change that, and is heading to the Supreme Court today to do so.

The LA Times brings the issue to light in anOp-Ed published today, begging the question: Should anyone, or any corporation, control a product of life?

The Op-Ed further illustrates the issue, saying:

Monsanto and other agrochemical companies assert that they need the current patent system to invent better seeds, the counterargument is that splicing an already existing gene or other DNA into a plant and thereby transferring a new trait to that plant is not a novel invention. A soybean, for example, has more than 46,000 genes. Properties of these genes are the product of centuries of plant breeding and should not, many argue, become the product of a corporation. Instead, these genes should remain in the public domain.

The innovation they're referring to includes their controversial Round-Up ready soybean seeds, which have resulted in genetic mutations of weeds called "super weeds." In order to combat these monsters, Monsanto is contemplating introduction of a similar ingredient to Agent Orange into their GMO seeds.

Sponsored message

It remains to be seen who will win the case, but one thing is for sure: We aren't going to be having a latte with soy milk this morning.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right