Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Food

FDA Will Finally Change The Way Food Gets Labeled

ezekielbread.JPG
Photo by Krista Simmons/LAist

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

With heightened concern surrounding our country's obesity epidemic and the overall well-being of our citizens in decline, it's a wonder that a change in the format by which we assess our daily diets hasn't happened sooner. But alas, it seems that the FDA might make some tweaks to the nutrition labels that have been the same for the past 20 years.

There's no estimate on how long it will take for the new labels will be released, but the FDA has sent guidelines for the new format to the White House, which is a start. The FDA has been working on the issue for a decade.

Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest told the Guardian that there are several key points the FDA should look into changing: the current labels are listed in grams, the metric system that many Americans don't quite grasp; the calorie content isn't as prominent as it should be; the calories from fat information is irrelevant; and labels don't distinguish between the sugars and syrups that are naturally occurring in foods and drinks and those that are added when they are processed or prepared.

Nutritionists are also pushing for front-of-package labeling, serving sizes that make more sense, and in the case of whole wheat bread, actually listing the percent of whole wheat.

Saysthe Guardian:

According to an Agriculture Department study released this month, a greater percentage of adults reported using the nutrition facts panel and other claims on food packages "always or most of the time" in 2009 and 2010 compared with two years earlier. The USDA study said 42% of working adults used the panel always or most of the time in 2009 and 2010, while older adults used it 57% of the time during that period.

So as people are increasingly becoming aware of their health and what they're putting into their bodies, it's important that they're given the tools to interpret information about their food correctly.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today