Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Lawsuit: LAPD Arrested Protesters Without Warning After Michael Brown Verdict
LAPD opens fire with non-lethal rounds off of Pico skirmish line in Nov. 2014 (via @gadinbcla/Instagram)
()
When hundreds protested in Los Angeles in 2014 over a grand jury's decision in Ferguson, Mo. to not indict a white police officer over the shooting death of unarmed black teen Michael Brown, activists then argued that police violated the demonstrators' constitutional rights. Now, over a year later, those protesters have filed a class-action lawsuit against the city for just that.
The lawsuit was filed this week on behalf of the individuals by National Lawyers Guild Los Angeles, according to the L.A. Times. It also named LAPD Chief Charlie Beck and other LAPD officials, arguing that the LAPD did not properly give dispersal warnings to the crowds. The suit claims that the city violated their 1st, 4th and 14th Amendment rights.
After the Nov. 24, 2014 grand jury decision, dozens of protests broke out across the country. Over the next few days, protesters in L.A. for the most part marched peacefully throughout the city, from Beverly Hills to downtown and South L.A. While demonstrators marched and some blocked traffic and freeways, there wasn't looting or fires like the epicenter of the protests in Ferguson. Over 323 protesters were arrested or detained during that time in Los Angeles, with many sitting in jail cells until they were released on Thanksgiving. LAPD at the time said they arrested some for failure to disperse and disorderly conduct. The suit claims protesters were told they were detained for blocking traffic.
The suit says that although LAPD officers gave dispersal orders at one of the protest spots, demonstrators at another location didn't hear the warnings. It also says law enforcement "detained, interrogated" protesters and that they were "forced to give up personal information."
Support for LAist comes from
Last November, Erin Darling, co-president of the National Lawyers Guild in Los Angeles, told the Times: "The LAPD used constitutionally dubious crowd-control tactics, in particular using a 'failure to disperse' in one time, in one place and with one group of protesters at another group, at another time and another place."
LAPD spokesman, Capt. Andrew Neiman, did not provide comment about the suit to the Times, saying it was because it's an ongoing litigation.
At the time of the arrests, however, police argued that they stood by their department's handling of the protesters. "We're going to let the courts determine if our pre-dispersal orders and arrests were legal," LAPD Cmdr. Andy Smith told the Times in 2014.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist