Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Silver Screen Not So Golden at Star-Vu Drive-In
We're all about creative dissent here at LAist. You got the pro view on the new Star-Vu Drive-In from Ryan Young. Now for something completely different. Here's an opposing take on the Star-Vu experience written especially for LAist by Josh Tate.

The words of Ian Malcolm troubled me as I surged onto the 405-N. "Dinosaurs had their shot and Nature selected them for extinction." The last three and a half hours of my life had been spent watching the 93-minute Shrek 3 at the spankin’ Star-Vu Drive-In at the Orange Country Fairgrounds. Christ, maybe there was a good reason that the drive-in had faded from our culture.
I wanted to like it. I swear, I really did. The last time I was at a drive-in I had managed to get completely wasted on only half a fifth of peach schnapps while enjoying the rare handie from my (then) c-tease of a girlfriend. Mind you, that was back in ‘87 so a thick aroma of nostalgia was percolating nicely as I pulled into the entrance of the Fairgrounds. There I met one of Star-Vu’s founders, Bob Deutsch, who seemed an eminently decent fellow, properly enthused about his new business and enjoying the corresponding cigar. This was the unfortunate highlight of the evening. Thereafter, my date and I spent the next 57 minutes inching towards the ticket counter located a scant quarter mile away and, more troubling, the rum buzz I had caught at dinner was disappearing.
By the time our car reached its slip, the movie was already 30 minutes late in starting, the concession stand was out of hot dogs and the popcorn was cold and unusually greasy. Star-Vu was undergoing some serious birth pangs. The movie eventually started about 45 minutes after the posted show-time of 10:30, but the audio was so hissy and the screen so dim that my date and I quickly submitted to the palpable schadenfreude impulse and cracked wise for the duration of the screening.

I’m not sure exactly what happened in Shrek 3. I can only assume that Shrek won and Donkey was instrumental. I mean seriously, isn’t that going to be the plot of Shrek 4, too? What is the real benefit of a meticulous Shrek 3 deconstruction, people? It’s not like I was watching motherfuckin’ Once right? (Go see Once!) As for the Star-Vu, I guess I can recommend it if actually enjoying the movie isn’t a paramount concern. Sure the audio and video were fairly crappy, but the SUV-loads of parents and children seemed to be having a grand time watching a movie in the open air under the stars. Maybe that’s finally the point. Cineastes might enjoy the novelty of it, but probably no more than once or twice. After all, the Bridge and the Arclight are out there delivering a significantly better experience for a decent price. A final note to my fellow Angelino degenerates--the security presence was fairly constant so be wary with your beers and weed.
WHERE: 88 Fair Drive in Costa Mesa, CA
COST: Adult tickets are $8.50. Children are $5.00 unless they’re under 5 in which case they’re free.
--No outside food or alcohol is allowed.
--Tickets must be purchased online at www.star-vu.com
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.