With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Movie Review: Twilight
()
When you can live forever what do you live for? | Photo courtesy of Summit Entertainment
It's difficult to review a film that is so purposefully intended for an audience other than myself. With its focus on chaste and forbidden love, Twilight is clearly aimed at those young teenage girls for whom actual, physical love is still some spectral thing and for whom dizzying romance is all. From the first moment that Bella Swan's eyes settle upon those of the mysterious Edward Cullen, it's clear that there is only one point to this movie: plot be damned, Twilight is about a love that can neither be resisted nor explained.
The question then for such a film--the same question that similarly exists in films as diverse as Romeo and Juliet and Brokeback Mountain--is, "Do we believe in the mystical connection between these two people?" The answer, by and large, is yes. That's due mostly to the talent of the two leads. Twilight is a faithful adaptation of Stephanie Meyers' hit novel and one component of that fidelity is some sporadically clunky dialogue that strictly relies on the ability of the actors to pull it off. Do they? Yes. Well, mostly.
Support for LAist comes from
()
We stood grown quiet at the name of love. | Photo courtesy of Summit Entertainment
But back to the plot for a moment for those unfamiliar with Meyers' work--it's fairly straightforward and speeds quickly towards its conclusion. Bella moves to the rainy hamlet of Forks, Washington where she quickly notices the brooding Edward. He is seemingly inapproachable, mostly because he is impossibly pale, rich and beautiful. Their paths quickly intersect and, on first blush, Edward seems to detest Bella. Of course, it's the opposite that's true. He is actually bewitched by her and soon they are circling each other.
There is, however, one large obstacle to their romance: Edward is a vampire and there is no blood he craves so much as that of Bella's. Worse yet, there is another vampire who feels the same way. I won't reveal any more of the story than that. As I indicated earlier, the plot is really secondary to the relationship of the two young lovers anyway. One other note--the film conforms very closely to the narrative of the novel so fans of the book shouldn't be too disappointed by the typical changes and elisions that film adaptations require.
Some older viewers will giggle at the almost absurd seriousness of the declarations made by Bella and Edward to each other. Cineastes will certainly quibble with the direction of Catherine Hardwicke, particularly some visual effects scenes that could have been conceptualized and choreographed with a little more clarity and vigor. Overall, though, Twilight really does sort of...work. Sure, most of its story is firmly lodged in the realm of fantasy but it is a fantasy. If you can suspend your disbelief for a couple hours, you will probably enjoy this glimpse into the passionate world of youth. Who wouldn't want to spend time in that world?
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
Best of LAist