With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Controversial LAPD Drone Pilot Program Approved, Several Detained At Protest Following Commission Meeting
A civilian panel that oversees the Los Angeles Police Department voted 3-to-1 Tuesday to approve a controversial drone pilot program, despite protests from many civil rights groups.
The Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners had previously approved guidelines for the proposed one-year pilot program at a meeting two weeks ago. The board then published the guidelines to their website and invited additional feedback from the public before making their final vote today. Only 6 percent of the 1,675 emails the department received about the proposed program were in support of it, according to City News Service.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition, and Black Lives Matter Los Angeles have all spoken out against program, with ACLU SoCal writing in a letter to the commission that the proposed program “poses serious risks to the privacy and civil rights of Los Angeles residents,” according to the L.A. Times.
There is an overwhelming disapproval of the LAPD's plan to use drones. pic.twitter.com/bdJb7FXXmN
— Drew Jones (@TheDrewJones) October 17, 2017
Support for LAist comes from
ACLU staff attorney Melanie Ochoa voiced particular concern about potential LAPD "mission creep" in an interview with the Times, saying “there’s nothing that stops [LAPD's list of when the drones can be used] from being expanded.”
Under the proposed rules, the drones would be used in a limited capacity for high-risk tactical operations, barricaded armed suspect responses, hostage rescues and situations involving explosive devices or hazardous materials. They would not be weaponized, or used for general surveillance. Any deployment would also have to be approved on a case-by-case basis. In an October 13 letter to the Board, LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck described the drone program as an "additional tool to de-escalate volatile tactical situations while reducing harm to the public, officers and to suspects."
Protesters also gathered before and after the commission to voice their dissent:
Crowd starting to gather here outside LAPD HQ as the community says No to Drones. #NoDronesLA pic.twitter.com/KchF31TrO1
— Stop LAPD Spying Coalition (@stoplapdspying) October 17, 2017
Members of the community have the intersection. #NoDronesLA pic.twitter.com/hMprW9G7cc
— Stop LAPD Spying Coalition (@stoplapdspying) October 17, 2017
LAPD public information officer Tony Im told LAist that several protesters were detained for blocking traffic at the intersection of 1st Street and Main in downtown Los Angeles following the commission meeting.
Support for LAist comes from
"It was an unlawful assembly. They did not have permits," Im said. It's not yet known how many of those individuals, if any, were formally arrested.
LAPD have arrested those who remained congregated in the intersection. pic.twitter.com/htKyrYKo53
— Drew Jones (@TheDrewJones) October 17, 2017
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care. -
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
Best of LAist