Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Controversial LAPD Drone Pilot Program Approved, Several Detained At Protest Following Commission Meeting
A civilian panel that oversees the Los Angeles Police Department voted 3-to-1 Tuesday to approve a controversial drone pilot program, despite protests from many civil rights groups.
The Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners had previously approved guidelines for the proposed one-year pilot program at a meeting two weeks ago. The board then published the guidelines to their website and invited additional feedback from the public before making their final vote today. Only 6 percent of the 1,675 emails the department received about the proposed program were in support of it, according to City News Service.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition, and Black Lives Matter Los Angeles have all spoken out against program, with ACLU SoCal writing in a letter to the commission that the proposed program “poses serious risks to the privacy and civil rights of Los Angeles residents,” according to the L.A. Times.
There is an overwhelming disapproval of the LAPD's plan to use drones. pic.twitter.com/bdJb7FXXmN
— Drew Jones (@TheDrewJones) October 17, 2017
ACLU staff attorney Melanie Ochoa voiced particular concern about potential LAPD "mission creep" in an interview with the Times, saying “there’s nothing that stops [LAPD's list of when the drones can be used] from being expanded.”
Under the proposed rules, the drones would be used in a limited capacity for high-risk tactical operations, barricaded armed suspect responses, hostage rescues and situations involving explosive devices or hazardous materials. They would not be weaponized, or used for general surveillance. Any deployment would also have to be approved on a case-by-case basis. In an October 13 letter to the Board, LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck described the drone program as an "additional tool to de-escalate volatile tactical situations while reducing harm to the public, officers and to suspects."
Protesters also gathered before and after the commission to voice their dissent:
Crowd starting to gather here outside LAPD HQ as the community says No to Drones. #NoDronesLA pic.twitter.com/KchF31TrO1
— Stop LAPD Spying Coalition (@stoplapdspying) October 17, 2017
Members of the community have the intersection. #NoDronesLA pic.twitter.com/hMprW9G7cc
— Stop LAPD Spying Coalition (@stoplapdspying) October 17, 2017
LAPD public information officer Tony Im told LAist that several protesters were detained for blocking traffic at the intersection of 1st Street and Main in downtown Los Angeles following the commission meeting.
"It was an unlawful assembly. They did not have permits," Im said. It's not yet known how many of those individuals, if any, were formally arrested.
LAPD have arrested those who remained congregated in the intersection. pic.twitter.com/htKyrYKo53
— Drew Jones (@TheDrewJones) October 17, 2017
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.