With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City's Bicycle Plan is 'Flawed,' Cyclists tell Transit Panel
A packed house at City Hall at yesterday's City Council Transportation Committee meeting | Photo by Danielle Director/LAist
()
A packed house at City Hall at yesterday's City Council Transportation Committee meeting | Photo by Danielle Director/LAist
By Danielle Directo, Special to LAist
At the Transportation Committee yesterday, the city presented its Bicycle Plan proposal, which maps potential fixes to L.A.’s streets to make riding easier and safer for cyclists. The verdict? “Flawed,” pretty embarrassing” and an “egregious waste of money” were among some of the comments from bike and community advocates, Sierra Club members and neighborhood councilmembers.
“No matter what people tell you, we are not involved in the process,” said bike activist Stephen Box, who also commented on several other items discussed at the meeting. “I’m calling on you to…call it dead,” he told Transportation Committee Councilmembers Wendy Greuel and Bill Rosendahl.
Support for LAist comes from
“I think it’s a big step backwards…This is a real slap in the face to bicyclists,” said Los Angeles Bicycle Advisory Committee member Joe Linton.
In addition to including more input from bicyclists who have first-hand experience riding the very streets included in the Bicycle Plan draft, the Department of Transportation’s proposal needed to be “more comprehensive,” said members of the public. The plan, which was released online before the meeting, also drew criticism for not being detailed enough, and speakers said the department wasn’t doing enough to make the proposal more widely available or to reach out to low-income, Spanish-speaking riders without Internet access. The department was also blasted for hiring an outside consultant to draw up the plans at a pretty price.
Citizens also added the city needs more driver education programs on bicyclists’ rights on the road, along with more signage notifying drivers of bike lanes and cyclists.
Greuel advised the committee to schedule another meeting next week and “come back with an outreach plan” to work with the public on the Bicycle Plan.
The LAPD failed to show for the discussion on the recent tensions between cyclists and drivers and the harsh treatment of bike riders by police. "By law, we are required to coexist, by law we are allowed to coexist," said one speaker, a local bike shop owner. "Can't we educate our our security, our police force to protect and to serve, not to persecute?"
Michelle Mowery, LADOT Senior Bike Coordinator, said $7.2 million in state and local funding for bicycle transportation programs is available. "It's there now, we hope it stays there, but we don't know if it will," she said.
Also up for discussion was the recently canned bike licensing law, speed limits and regulations for sidewalk bike riders, how to addressed abandoned bicycles on city-owned bike racks and the potential impact of contracting bike lane maintenance activities. The council made a motion to continue the discussion during next week's meeting.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Heavy rain from the early-season storm could trigger debris flows. Snow is also possible above 7,000 feet. -
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership announces that 11% of the workforce is being cut. -
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
Best of LAist