With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. Moves Ahead on Aggressive Plastic and Paper Bag Ban
Photo by Jon Nightingale via Shutterstock
()
Wednesday, the Los Angeles City Council took steps forward in crafting an aggressive ban on single-use plastic and paper bags. The council's Energy and Environment Committee unanimously passed a recommendation for a three-phase ban that would, if enacted, become "one of the most-far reaching measures in the nation," describes Heal the Bay.
The ban would find single-use plastic bags at retail locations banned for an initial six-month period, then for the following six months a 10-cent surcharge would be placed on paper bags, and, following that period, single-use paper and plastic bags would be banned outright in the city of Los Angeles.
Though the recommendation, led by Councilman Paul Koretz, was favored by the committee, and supported by environmental groups, there was testimony from those who believe such a ban would be more destructive than helpful. Koretz "compared the [a plastic bag manufacturing] company to makers of horse-drawn carriages at the start of the 20th century," at Wednesday's meeting, when the discussion turned to loss of jobs, according to the L.A. Times.
Via email, we received a statement from Mark Daniels, Vice President of Sustainability and Environmental Policy for Hilex Poly and Chair of the American Progressive Bag Alliance, in opposition of L.A.'s proposed bag ban:
Support for LAist comes from
“The proposed policy will have no real impact on litter, instead it will only force residents to purchase less environmentally-friendly alternatives like reusable bags, nearly all of which are not recyclable, are less sanitary, are made in China using foreign oil, and often contain heavy metals. Worse, bag bans inflict a regressive tax on the disadvantaged, impose a burden on small businesses, and are a threat to local manufacturing jobs. More than a thousand workers in the Los Angeles area alone rely on quality jobs in the plastic bag manufacturing industry and urge the City Council to consider the impact this legislation will have on them and their families.”
However, as Heal the Bay notes, the city's Board of Public Works provided testimony that aimed to "debunk claims from bag manufactures that the ban would create job losses."
None of the bag makers, however, are based in the City of Los Angeles, which keeps the Council from being in a position to help those businesses. "I wish that we could do something to assist them," said Councilman Richard Alarcon.
The City would provide time to work with retail businesses to help them adjust, and consumers would need to adapt, which Councilman Dennis Zine says is realistic: "People will adjust," he said. "They'll adapt ... and learn to take [reusable bags] with them."
A vote on the recommended ban is expected in the full City Council in the coming weeks. Should the recommendation pass, the next step would be for the city to conduct a full environmental review of the issue as proposed before drafting an ordinance for further approval.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails. -
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
Best of LAist