With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
CA Emission Standards Threatened By New Federal Legislation
Photo by David Reber's Hammer Photography via Flickr
()
By Kevin Mathews/Special to LAistThanks to its massive air pollution problem, California currently enforces the strictest car emission standards in the country. These stringent practices may be in jeopardy, however, due to the Energy Tax Prevention Act, newly proposed legislation at the federal level, according to SFGate.
Though the bill would apply to the entire country, the Energy Tax Prevention Act would most drastically impact California. For several decades, the state has received a federal waiver allowing it to impose tougher regulations to counter its high air pollution levels. In addition to eliminating this waiver, the bill would nullify other state measures designed to reduce carbon emissions, including the Global Warming Solutions Act backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006.
Last night, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the Energy Tax Prevention Act. Led by Republicans, its supporters argue that it is not fair to tax businesses and individuals on environmental information they deem speculative. They hope reducing standards will save jobs and help businesses.
The bill still faces a large obstacle before passing through Congress, namely a Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate. California Senator Barbara Boxer, who referred to the proposal as the “Reliance on Foreign Oil Forever Act” on Twitter, vows to fight the legislation.
Support for LAist comes from
Fellow opponents contend that not only would the proposal be detrimental to the environment, it also limits a state’s right to determine its own safety standards.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases. -
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead. -
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades. -
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.
Best of LAist