One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
CA Emission Standards Threatened By New Federal Legislation
Photo by David Reber's Hammer Photography via Flickr
By Kevin Mathews/Special to LAistThanks to its massive air pollution problem, California currently enforces the strictest car emission standards in the country. These stringent practices may be in jeopardy, however, due to the Energy Tax Prevention Act, newly proposed legislation at the federal level, according to SFGate.
Though the bill would apply to the entire country, the Energy Tax Prevention Act would most drastically impact California. For several decades, the state has received a federal waiver allowing it to impose tougher regulations to counter its high air pollution levels. In addition to eliminating this waiver, the bill would nullify other state measures designed to reduce carbon emissions, including the Global Warming Solutions Act backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006.
Last night, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the Energy Tax Prevention Act. Led by Republicans, its supporters argue that it is not fair to tax businesses and individuals on environmental information they deem speculative. They hope reducing standards will save jobs and help businesses.
The bill still faces a large obstacle before passing through Congress, namely a Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate. California Senator Barbara Boxer, who referred to the proposal as the “Reliance on Foreign Oil Forever Act” on Twitter, vows to fight the legislation.
Fellow opponents contend that not only would the proposal be detrimental to the environment, it also limits a state’s right to determine its own safety standards.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
