Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

Arts and Entertainment

Increased Representation On Screen Was Good For TV Business During Pandemic

An image of four cast members of the TV series Insecure, wearing trendy outfits at the final season premiere of the HBO show.
(L-R) Prentice Penny, Yvonne Orji, Issa Rae and Jay Ellis attend HBO's final season premiere of "Insecure" at Kenneth Hahn Park on October 21, 2021.
(
Amy Sussman
/
Getty Images North America
)

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

If you were to watch some of the top series on streaming platforms and cable channels — Netflix’s “Bridgerton,” HBO’s “Insecure,” Hulu’s “Our Kind of People” and Amazon’s “The Underground Railroad”— you reasonably could conclude that Hollywood’s commitment to diversity was bearing fruit.

But if you then picked up your remote and surfed through some of the highest-rated network TV shows — CBS’ “Young Sheldon,” NBC’s “Chicago Fire” and ABC’s “The Goldbergs” — you might immediately say the exact opposite: nothing has really changed.

According to a new Hollywood Diversity Report from UCLA, you’d be right on both counts.

The report, which examined 461 scripted shows in the 2019-2020 TV season, found that people of color posted gains in nine of 12 job categories in front of and behind the camera relative to their white counterparts from the previous season.

Support for LAist comes from

Overall, however, women and people of color remain under-represented as lead performers, writers and directors relative to the U.S. population, of which more than 42% identify as people of color.

UCLA’s researchers found the gains in diversity, even when minimal, were not spread equally among content creators and distribution platforms. In lead acting roles, for example, fewer than a quarter of network TV shows cast a person of color, while the share for cable and streaming series was closer to a third.

Fewer than one in 10 network series was created by a person of color. Even though those figures from cable and streaming were better (20.6% and 14.7%, respectively), they still were far below their portion of the U.S. population.

As other studies have shown, diverse programs do good business. UCLA reported that every one of the top 10 broadcast shows in Black households and eight of the top 10 broadcast shows in white households featured casts that were at least 21% minority. And nine of the Top 10 broadcast shows for younger (18-19 year-old) Asian and Latinx viewers had the same or better cast diversity.

Latinx people, who make up more than 18% of the country, continue to be the most marginalized, in broadcast, streaming and cable series. Latinx actors had just 6.3% of broadcast TV roles, and only 5.5% in streaming. Latinx directors made only 5.4% of broadcast TV episodes, 3.5% of cable episodes, and 3% of streaming episodes.

Despite a lack of growth for Latinx actors, the overall proportion of people of color on screen has increased over time.

Nearly a third of broadcast shows in the latest study had majority non-white casts. Compare that to the first such UCLA study eight years ago, when the numbers for the 2011-2012 season was just 2%.

Support for LAist comes from
An illustration of bar graphs showing the growth of people of color in broadcast scripted shows.
(
Courtesy UCLA
)

The report said that material change wouldn’t happen until top decision makers are more diverse; the two top Netflix executives, for example, are straight white men.

The report concludes: “Only when women and people of color are integrated into these defining spaces — and in meaningful proportions — will Hollywood truly solve its diversity problem.”

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist