One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
52% of Californians Don't Want High Speed Rail
The project months from breaking ground, a majority of Californian voters think the state-wide high speed rail is a bad idea according to a new USC Dornsife/LA Times poll.
Voters in 2008 approved Proposition 1A that issued $9.95 billion in bonds to partially fund the 800-mile rail line supervised by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. The proposition passed with 52.7% approval.
According to the USC Dornsife/LA Times poll conducted in September, 70% of responders say they want a re-vote while 51% say the project is a waste of money. In Los Angeles County, 49% oppose the project and 71% want a re-vote while 49% think the project is a waste of money.
Unsurprisingly voters in the Central Valley and in the North Counties strongly oppose the project, however the margin of approval among the liberal hotbeds of San Francisco and Los Angeles counties has shrunk.
One of the reasons support has waned over the years has been the cost overruns. Originally projected to cost $40 billion, the California High-Speed Rail Authority revised the projections to $98.5 billion to as much as $118 billion in 2011.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
