The Brief

The contractor building the LAX Automated People Mover will soon initiate a simulation of how the train will operate when it begins shuttling travelers between airport terminals and the L.A. Metro system.

If you catch yourself at the airport once this phase of testing begins the week of April 20, you'll see empty cars traversing the 2.25-mile-long tracks on the same 24/7 schedule the train will use when it opens.

“It’s a big milestone for the project, and a visible milestone,” said Jake Adams, an airport executive who is overseeing $5.5 billion in LAX upgrades, including the people mover.

Meanwhile, Los Angeles World Airports, the city agency that manages LAX, and its contractor for the people mover have escalated their rhetoric over a dispute that began last year over faulty electrical equipment, according to an LAist review of correspondences received through a public records request.

Adams said he’s “fairly optimistic” that the dispute can be resolved separately from opening the train to the public, even if it intensifies into a legal battle.

Considering the projected timeline for this next phase of testing, the train likely won’t be open in time for the World Cup in June, which was once slated to open in 2023.

Adams said the airport’s peak summer traveler count “far exceeds” the number of people expected for the World Cup and that he doesn’t anticipate any issues.

Testing the reliability of the train

The testing milestone that is slated to begin the week of April 20 is designed to assess the reliability of the train.

“The requirement is that [the contractor has] to operate it for 30 consecutive days without a hiccup,” Adams said of the testing phase known as “system demonstration.”

What a “hiccup” could look like ranges, Adams said. An example of a major issue that could restart that 30-day clock is if one of the train cars breaks down. A more minor one would be if a train door fails to open at a platform.

Adams said the process is likely to take a total of 60 days based on conversations with other airports that have developed similar people mover systems.

Contractual dispute over electrical maintenance remains open

In November, LAist reported on a dispute over repairs to equipment in a metering cabinet. That work required power to be partially shut down between February and July 2025, temporarily delaying critical testing of the technology that allows for central control of the people mover’s systems.

Though the technical issue has been resolved, the contractual dispute remains open. LINXS, the group of companies contracted to design, build and operate the train, has taken the position that the repair work isn’t included in its scope of work. Los Angeles World Airports disagrees.

As of October, LINXS said the extra work cost $36 million, according to a document detailing LINXS’ claim that LAist received through a public records request.

The contractor group in December filed a claim under a section of state law that governs complaints against public entities. The L.A. City Attorney's Office rejected the claim in January, initiating a six-month window within which LINXS can sue the city.

“We will not comment on active disputes,” a spokesperson for LINXS said in an email when LAist reached out about the issue last month.

In January 2026, when there was concern that the technical issue with the metering cabinet was reoccurring, LAX officials directed LINXS to investigate the issue. The contractor group initially refused to do so.

William Dachs, CEO of LINXS, said in a letter to the city in January that “failure to resolve this … will ultimately lead to contract termination this coming fall, resulting in the City of Los Angeles having to repay the Lenders’ Liabilities which, at this early stage, is estimated to be over $1.1 Billion.”

Ultimately, a joint investigation found the concerns about the reoccurring issues were unfounded. Still, the episode reflects how uniquely contentious the dispute is.

Whereas past disputes between LINXS and the airport were resolved through settlements that have so far totaled hundreds of millions of dollars and resulted in schedule extensions, the dispute over maintaining electrical equipment is the one that has gotten closest to potential litigation.

“Other relief events that we’ve dealt with up to this point … we could agree there were some things that were not totally within LINXS’ control,” Adams said. “This relief event is very different. We believe there is absolutely no merit to this claim.”

Disputes between LINXS and two of its subcontractors have already resulted in litigation, with one subcontractor accusing LINXS of “secretive, deceptive and improper conduct” and neglecting to pass settlement money down to subcontractors.

An L.A. County Civil Grand Jury report released last year claimed that LINXS has used the dispute resolution process and “political pressures,” such as L.A.’s status as host city for several upcoming mega-events, to force contract extensions and additional compensation throughout the design and construction process.

What happens next? Is there a date for opening? 

There are still a few more steps to complete once the system demonstration is successful, including resolving a dispute involving damage to the sprinkler systems that water plants along roads near the airport. Those roads received new landscaping as part of the project.

“LINXS is taking a very contractual position that they have to complete all of the work that's in their contract before they can open the train,” Adams said. “We are taking the position that the irrigation absolutely has nothing to do with operating the train.”

Adams characterized the conversations to “decouple” the sprinklers from the actual train itself as “active.”

The final steps include getting approval from the California Public Utilities Commission and testing the train with volunteers.

Adams did not commit to a date for when travelers will be able to fully use the train.

California lawmakers are advancing a new strategy to discourage efforts to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Colorado law banning the practice. The strategy: Extend the statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims.

A bill introduced by Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat from San Francisco, would increase the time period during which someone could file a malpractice suit against a mental health professional for trying to change their sexual orientation or gender and harming them in the process. Depending on the age of the person who files the claim, the bill would increase the statute of limitations from three years to 22 years or within five years of discovering the harm.

“You can't change someone who is LGBTQ into not being LGBTQ. All major medical associations agree that sexual orientation and gender identity are immutable characteristics, and that so-called conversion therapy is fraud that harms patients,” Wiener said during a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

Wiener likened the change to a similar move by the Legislature to extend the statute of limitations for victims of child sexual assault.

The committee voted 10-to-2 Tuesday to advance the legislation along party lines.

Major medical and mental health organizations condemn conversion therapy, which is rooted in the now-debunked theory that homosexuality was a mental illness. Studies link it to increased depression and suicidality — and no credible evidence shows it works.

California was the first state to ban using the practice on children in 2012, and many states followed suit. But last month, the Supreme Court sent a case contesting Colorado’s conversion therapy ban on First Amendment grounds back to the lower courts. In an 8-to-1 opinion, the justices sided with Kaley Chiles, a Christian therapist who argued the law violated her free speech rights because it allowed her to “affirm” a client’s sexual orientation but prevented her from speaking about changing their orientation for clients who have that goal.

The opinion did not rule directly on the constitutionality of Colorado’s conversion therapy ban, but Justice Neil Gorsuch implied in the majority opinion that Colorado’s ban would fail the “strict scrutiny” test required of laws that regulate speech.

“What this decision is essentially saying is that it doesn’t matter that states have an interest in regulating the quality of care for their patients. Her right to express herself doesn’t stop when she steps into her office and practices her profession that is licensed by the state” said Elana Redfield, an attorney and federal policy director at UCLA’s Williams Institute, which researches LGBTQ legal issues.

Making more time for malpractice claims

The decision endangers California’s law as well as dozens of similar laws in other states, but Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for LGBTQ Rights, said the court’s decision gives him some hope. Because almost all medical organizations have disavowed conversion therapy, attempting it would still be considered malpractice even if state bans are no longer in effect.

“After having some time to digest the opinion and read it carefully, it seems there is a very clear path forward, and at the end of the day paradoxically we’ll be in a much stronger legal position in terms of these protections,” Minter said.

In the majority opinion, Justice Gorsuch differentiated malpractice laws from bans stating that they allow “breathing room for protected speech.”

In California, a patient can sue a medical provider for damages if they believe they were injured by the provider’s negligent behavior. These types of cases require expert witnesses to testify about the accepted standard of medical care and also place the burden of proof on the patient.

The remaining obstacle, Minter said, is time. Many LGBTQ individuals don’t realize the harm until years later, well past the existing statute of limitations. Wiener’s proposal would solve that problem and help deter state-licensed therapists from engaging in the practice in the first place, he said.

“One of the unique ways conversion therapy harms young people in particular is it encourages them to blame themselves for the therapy failing,” Minter said. “Almost (every time) that someone comes to us or another attorney realizing that it is not their fault, it’s too late. That has happened with us time and time again.”

Christian groups, parents oppose

Opponents of the measure say it’s a clear effort to circumvent the Supreme Court’s decision, which will likely prevent states like California from enforcing conversion therapy bans.

“If they can’t ban the counseling, they’ll bankrupt the counselors who do it,” said Greg Burt, vice president of the California Family Council, a Fresno-based Christian advocacy group.

Burt argued the Supreme Court was clear in ruling that a therapist’s speech during a client’s session is constitutionally protected and that Wiener’s measure, if passed, would face the same legal challenges since it would still effectively suppress speech.

Burt acknowledged that counseling is “pointless” if the client doesn’t agree with the goals of the therapy, but said some Christians may feel same-sex attraction or gender dysphoria but still want to live according to their faith.

“I would hope people can pick their own goals in counseling and it would protect anybody. Why is the government involved in which goals we have for our life regarding sexuality and gender identity,” Burt said.

The bill is also opposed by California Baptists for Biblical Values and other groups that have historically opposed state efforts to shore up protections for transgender youth.

Decision calls into question “talk therapy”

Julia Sadusky, a licensed psychologist in Colorado, co-authored an amicus brief in the Chiles v. Salazar case asking the Supreme Court to uphold the ban – and describes herself as a theologically orthodox Catholic.

For years, she has counseled children from religious families who want to align their identities with their faith; the ban, she said, never got in the way of her work. She and another Christian psychologist developed a clinical method to help religious LGBTQ youth explore identity without coercive practices.

The key distinction in her practice, Sadusky said, is that she never promises a predetermined outcome. Clients make their own choices about how to live — some pursue same-sex relationships, some do not, some transition, some don't.

“The focus is on, how do I resolve value conflicts that come up for me when I have conflicts between different aspects of my identity, not how do I change my identity as such,” Sadusky said.

She’s worried now that the Supreme Court’s decision will “wreak havoc on the credibility of therapy” as a clinical practice.

“The most troubling part to me was the framing of talk therapy as merely protected free speech, given that talk therapy incorporates treatment modalities or ought to, and isn't merely telling a person what you believe about their life or what you recommend to them,” she said.

Some legal scholars agree. Redfield with UCLA’s Williams Institute said the court’s decision could have widespread impacts on the medical field.

“All patients should be concerned because this undermines our ability to trust doctors. And it places the burden on consumers to bring a lawsuit,” Redfield said.

Supported by the California Health Care Foundation (CHCF), which works to ensure that people have access to the care they need, when they need it, at a price they can afford. Visit www.chcf.org to learn more.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

LAGOS, Nigeria — Pope Leo XIV said he is undeterred by criticism from President Donald Trump and will continue speaking out against war, emphasizing peace, dialogue and cooperation between nations.

Speaking to reporters on Monday as he began an 11-day tour of Africa, the first American pope stressed that global conflicts are causing immense human suffering and insisted that moral leadership requires advocating for alternatives to violence.

"I will continue to speak out loudly against war, looking to promote peace, promoting dialogue and multilateral relationships among states to find just solutions to problems," he said. "Too many people are suffering in the world today. Too many innocent people are being killed. And I think someone has to stand up and say there's a better way."

The remarks come amid escalating tensions between the Vatican and Washington over the Iran conflict.

Speaking at a worldwide peace vigil at St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City on Saturday, Pope Leo warned against what he described as a "delusion of omnipotence" driving global instability, urging world leaders to prioritize diplomacy over military escalation.

Trump responded sharply the following day, criticizing the pope's leadership and accusing him of being weak on crime and ineffective on foreign policy.

In posts on Truth Social on Sunday night, he argued that the pontiff should focus on religious leadership rather than politics.

"I don't want a Pope who thinks it's OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon," Trump posted. "I don't want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I'm doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do."

Trump also took issue with the pope's criticism of U.S. policy.

In a flurry of late-night posts, Trump also shared an AI-generated image depicting himself as Jesus Christ, without offering any explanation.

A Vatican spokesman responded to Trump's social media posts, saying they reflected his "impotence" in the face of the Vatican's criticism of the Iran war.

"When political power turns against a moral voice, it is often because it cannot contain it," Father Antonio Spadaro, under-secretary of the Vatican's Dicastery of Culture and Education, wrote in a social media post. "… Unable to absorb that voice, power tries to delegitimize it. Yet in doing so, it implicitly acknowledges its weight."

Trump's rebuke came as three U.S. cardinals chose to speak out against the Iran war in a rare joint television appearance on 60 Minutes on Sunday night.

"In Catholic teaching, this is not a just war," Cardinal Robert McElroy, the archbishop of Washington, D.C., told the program. "This is a war of choice. … I think it's embedded in a wider moment in the U.S. that's worrying: We're seeing before us the possibility of war after war after war."

Despite the attack from President Trump, Pope Leo reiterated that he will continue to speak out "loudly against war," advocating for dialogue and multilateral solutions.

His trip to Africa — which includes stops in Algeria, Angola, Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon — is focused on promoting unity, peace and stronger interfaith relationships.

The pope opened the journey in Algiers, where he was welcomed by President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, marking the first-ever papal visit to the country and underscoring the symbolic importance of engaging with predominantly Muslim nations.

But the trip is set to be dominated by the deepening rift between the Vatican and Washington, as the pope's calls for peace play out amid an increasingly public and personal clash with Donald Trump — all the more striking given he is the first American to lead the Catholic Church.
Copyright 2026 NPR

The U.S. military will block ships from entering or exiting Iranian ports on Monday after the U.S. and Iran failed to reach an agreement in direct talks over the weekend.

The U.S. Central Command, known as CENTCOM, said the blockade would be enforced from 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

"The blockade will be enforced impartially against vessels of all nations entering or departing Iranian ports and coastal areas, including all Iranian ports on the Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman," CENTCOM posted on social media on Sunday.

CENTCOM said it "will not impede freedom of navigation for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports."

President Trump said Sunday he instructed the U.S. Navy "to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran."

"No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas," he added.

The decision to block vessels entering and leaving Iranian ports came after the U.S. and Iran failed to reach an end to the war, during the direct talks that took place in Islamabad, Pakistan, over the weekend.

Israel and Hezbollah continued to trade strikes on Monday as efforts were underway for Israeli and Lebanese officials to meet in Washington for ceasefire talks.

Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron announced preparations for a "peaceful multinational mission aimed at restoring freedom of navigation" in the Strait of Hormuz. He said he would be convening a conference on these plans "in the coming days" together with Britain.

Brent crude oil, the international standard, jumped to $102.24 a barrel on Monday.

Vice President Vance waves while boarding Air Force Two as he leaves Islamabad on Sunday. Vance spent 21 hours on the ground in Islamabad and stated an agreement was not made with Iran.

(

Jacquelyn Martin

/

Getty Images

)

Here are more updates from the region:

Click the links below to jump down to a specific section.

France and U.K. reactions | Iran on Strait of Hormuz| U.S.-Iran talks | Lebanon | U.S. warships | Iran executions

British PM says UK will not join blockade, French president proposes 'peaceful multinational mission'

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday the United Kingdom will not join President Trump's blockade of Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz. Starmer said his focus was to keep the waterway open.

Speaking to BBC Radio, Starmer said he would not go into operational matters, but that the UK's efforts would be aimed at reopening the strait.

"All of the marshalling diplomatically, politically and capability, we do have minesweeping capability… That's all focused from our point of view, on getting the straits fully open," Starmer said.

He said that was the only way to get energy bills down for people in the U.K. who, according to him, were paying the price of the war in Iran.

Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday that "in the coming days," France and Britain will organize a conference with "those countries prepared to contribute alongside us to a peaceful multinational mission aimed at restoring freedom of navigation" in the Strait of Hormuz.

"This strictly defensive mission, separate from the warring parties to the conflict, is intended to be deployed as soon as circumstances permit," Macron posted on X.

Iran says warships "will be met with strong" response

Trump wrote on social media on Sunday that the talks between the U.S. delegation led by Vice President Vance and the Iranian delegation failed because "IRAN IS UNWILLING TO GIVE UP ITS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS!"

Tehran has repeatedly said that its nuclear program is a civilian one, and that it has a right to continue to enrich uranium for that purpose.

In a series of posts on social media on Sunday, Iran's military spokesman, Ebrahim Zolfaghari, said "warships nearing the Strait of Hormuz will be met with a strong and decisive response."

Zolfaghari also threatened to block the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, in response to U.S. action. The waterway is tucked between Yemen and the Horn of Africa, connecting the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea to the Suez Canal.

Last week's ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran had minimal impact on the movement of goods through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran had largely shut down the strait to commercial vessels and in some cases demanded steep tolls for ships to pass. The decision by the Trump administration to block Iran's ports is likely to further heighten tensions and exacerbate fuel shortages worldwide.

Nearly 20% of the global supply of oil and gas normally moves through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has largely blocked since the joint U.S. and Israeli strikes against it began on Feb. 28.

Commuters wait on the platform for their metro train to arrive in the capital Tehran on April 13, 2026.

(

Atta Kenare

/

AFP via Getty Images

)

U.S. and Iran talks fail, sides signal they are far apart on nuclear enrichment

The U.S. and Iran failed to reach an agreement in highly anticipated face-to-face peace talks that took place over the weekend in Islamabad. On Sunday, after 21 hours of talks, Vice President Vance said Iran chose "not to accept our terms."

Asked what the major sticking point had been that led to the breakdown in negotiations, Vance said: "The simple fact is that we need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon."

For its part, Iran said the two sides had "reached an understanding on a number of issues, but ultimately the talks did not lead to an agreement."

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghachi, a member of the Iranian negotiating team, said Sunday his country "engaged with (the) U.S. in good faith to end the war," adding that when the two sides were close to reaching an understanding, "we encountered maximalism, shifting goalposts, and blockade."

The status of the two-week ceasefire, which extends until April 22, is now uncertain. But Vance left open the possibility that an agreement could still be reached, saying: "We leave here with a very simple proposal: a method of understanding that is our final and best offer." He added: "We'll see if the Iranians accept it."

The talks in Islamabad were the first face-to-face engagement between the U.S. and Iran since 2015, when the Obama administration negotiated a nuclear deal with Iran that was later scrapped by Trump. They were also the highest-level discussions since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

In a Fox News interview on Sunday, Trump doubled down in his stance that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon, and said he believes Iran will "come to the table" and give up its nuclear weapons efforts. Asked if he will continue to "destruct" Iran if they don't give up their nuclear weapons program, Trump said: "If they don't give that plan up, yeah."

On Saturday, Trump said "We win, regardless" of the outcome of negotiations, adding, "we've totally defeated that country."

US warships pass through Strait of Hormuz

As the talks between the U.S. and Iran were underway, two U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers passed through the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, a U.S. official told NPR, marking the first transit of American warships since the start of the Iran war six weeks ago.

CENTCOM said it had begun setting conditions to clear Iranian sea mines planted throughout the waterway to "encourage the free flow of commerce."

Israel and Hezbollah continue to trade strikes

Attacks continued in Lebanon on Monday as Israeli airstrikes hit border villages that Israel says is it seizing from Lebanon, in order to create a buffer zone to prevent militant group Hezbollah from firing cross-border rockets.

Lebanese authorities said more than 100 people were killed over the weekend from Israeli attacks.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who crossed into Lebanon on Sunday, said those displaced from southern Lebanon will not be allowed to return to their homes. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the goal of Israel's campaign is to destroy houses in the area to prevent Hezbollah from using them.

Their statements came as preparations were under way for Israeli and Lebanese ambassadors to meet on Tuesday in Washington for ceasefire talks, the first direct official talks between the two countries since 1983. The talks are not supported by Hezbollah, which held a rally in Beirut over the weekend, filling several blocks of the capital.

The Lebanese government said Israel has destroyed around 40,000 houses in the past 35 days.

Lebanese Red Cross volunteers inspect the damage to their rescue ambulances at the site of an Israeli drone strike that targeted their headquarters in the southern city of Tyre on April 13, 2026.

(

Kawnat Haju

/

AFP via Getty Images

)

The Lebanese Red Cross said that one of its ambulance teams was directly targeted by an Israeli drone over the weekend, killing one paramedic and wounding another. The death brought the number of the medics killed to at least 57 in the past six weeks, according to Lebanese authorities. Israel denies it is targeting medics and accused Hezbollah of transporting weapons in ambulances.

Human rights groups say Iran increased executions

At least 1,639 people were executed in Iran in 2025, according to a joint report by the Norwegian organization Iran Human Rights and Paris-based Together Against the Death Penalty.

According to the two watchdogs, the figure represents an increase of 68% over the previous year.

A wave of arrests and executions followed the country-wide protests that started in December of 2025 and trailed into January.

Mass arrests have also been regularly reported in Iran's state media since the start of the war, with authorities accusing those it rounds up of having ties to Israel or aiding terrorist groups.

Betsy Joles in Islamabad, Lauren Frayer in Beirut, D Parvaz in Van, Turkey, Fatima Al-Kassab in London and Tina Kraja in Washington, DC contributed to this report.

Copyright 2026 NPR

Two big cultural spots in L.A. are going to be closed for a while — the La Brea Tar Pits and the Getty Center are both about to undergo extensive renovations ahead of the 2028 Olympics. So it’s a good thing we have all these new spaces opening, like LACMA’s David Geffen Galleries, the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, and Dataland, to keep us occupied. Kudos on the smart timing, arts administration friends!

Whether you’re recovering from Coachella or heading out for weekend two or neither, there’s plenty of music in town this week. Licorice Pizza recommends outlaw country legend Dale Watson at Zebulon on Monday, while on Tuesday, Lykke Li is at the Fonda and Herbie Hancock plays Disney Hall. On Wednesday, local heroes Redd Kross bring their "peach kelli pop" to the Lodge Room, Swae Lee plays the Novo, Wet Leg catches these fists at the Fox Theater Pomona, coldwave duo Lebanon Hanover plays their first of two nights at the Vermont Hollywood and Grammy-winning jazz diva Samara Joy plays the first of two nights at Blue Note.

Elsewhere on LAist, you can get the latest on Olympics ticket drops, find out how you can help the Aquarium of the Pacific save a beloved sea turtle and check out the best empanadas across L.A.

Events

English

Through Sunday, April 26
The Wallis 
9390 N. Santa Monica Blvd., Beverly Hills
COST: FROM $53; MORE INFO 

(

KEVIN PARRY

)

The Pulitzer Prize-winning play English, by Orange County’s own Sanaz Toossi, is clever, poignant and utterly original. The play is set in a TOEFL class in Tehran in 2008, where a sparse classroom serves as the setting for an intergenerational, cross-cultural conversation that explores the feelings of being an outsider while considering and reconsidering what is home. The show is almost entirely in English; in a genius move, the actors seamlessly use their fluent, comfortable American accents when “speaking” Farsi and more stilted English when in the classroom. Knud Adams directs the production, which comes to the Wallis straight from Broadway and stars most of the original cast.

Punk for the People, Vol. 2: Punk Movements

Tuesday, April 14, 7 p.m.
Bovard Auditorium
3551 Trousdale Parkway, University Park
COST: FREE; MORE INFO

(

USC Visions and Voices

/

Eventbrite

)

NYC sometimes gets all the credit for being the home of punk rock, but L.A.’s punk history is loud and clear. Fans won’t want to miss this free panel with USC’s Visions and Voices, featuring punk legend Kathleen Hanna of Bikini Kill, queercore icon Bruce LaBruce, filmmaker and AfroPunk Festival founder James Spooner and Limp Wrist singer Martin Sorrondeguy.

Kenny Harris

Through Saturday, May 2
Billis/Williams Gallery 
2716 S. La Cienega Blvd., Culver City
COST: FREE; MORE INFO

(

Kenny Harris

/

Billis/Williams Gallery

)

I know I’m a little biased, having lived in Venice all these years, but Kenny Harris’ paintings make my little neighborhood feel dreamy, historic and real all at once. This solo show at Billis/Williams Gallery in Culver City is just a stone's throw from the real-life beach and canal scenes that Harris so lovingly depicts.

Going to Extremes: A John Waters 80th Birthday Celebration 

Tuesday, April 14, 8 p.m.
The Luckman Fine Arts Complex at Cal State LA 
5151 State University Drive, Monterey Park
COST: FROM $50; MORE INFO 

John Waters brings his show “Going to Extremes” to The Luckman on April 14, 2026.

(

Greg Gorman

)

Weird and wonderful John Waters turns 80 this year, and if you caught the Academy Museum exhibit on his work, you won’t want to miss this live birthday extravaganza honoring Baltimore’s most out-there filmmaker. Waters himself will be there to reflect on eight decades of “gleeful provocation” and share the stories and inspirations that shaped his career.

Fowler Talks: Decolonizing Philippine History, Rethinking Ifugao and Indigeneity

Wednesday, April 15, 6 p.m.
Fowler Museum UCLA
308 Charles E. Young Dr. N., Westwood
COST: FREE; MORE INFO 

(

Paul Connor

/

The Fowler Museum at UCLA

)

The newest exhibit at the Fowler, Mountain Spirits, looks at the world of the Ifugao people in northern Luzon. It just opened this past weekend, and along with it comes a series of talks delving into Filipino culture and history. This one features archaeologist Stephen Acabado and community leader Marlon Martin exploring how rice terraces flourished as acts of resistance to colonial intrusion, highlighting agriculture, ritual exchange and environmental design as adaptive systems that continue to shape contemporary climate discourse.

Lunchtime Concerts at Colburn

Tuesdays through May 4, 12 p.m.
Colburn Plaza
200 S. Grand Ave., Downtown L.A.
COST: FREE; MORE INFO

(

Courtesy Colburn School

)

Your most chill lunch hour is back. Grab your sandwich and head to Colburn Plaza for free weekly classical concerts with the musicians of the Colburn School, supported by the Downtown L.A. Alliance.

American Food (R)evolution panel

Monday, April 13, 4:30 p.m.
Maydan Market
4301 W. Jefferson Blvd., West Adams 
COST: FREE; MORE INFO

(

Ashley Randall Photography

/

Maydan Market

)

Chef Sean Sherman was a pioneer in bringing indigenous cooking into mainstream fine dining with his groundbreaking Minneapolis restaurant Owamni. Lucky for us, he’s in town for a conversation moderated by L.A. Taco’s Javier Cabral, alongside Maydan founder and chef Rose Previte, chef Alfonso “Poncho” Martinez and activist Odilia Romero of Lugya’h. They’ll discuss Sherman’s new book, Turtle Island, and the “intersection of culture, identity, and politics through the lens of food.” A dinner at Maydan (separate reservation and payment required) will follow, where Previte, Martinez and Sherman will host a one-night-only communal “Tawle” feast, featuring Maydan’s signature Middle Eastern dishes alongside special, fire-based creations from Sherman and Martinez, celebrating Indigenous American and Zapotec cuisines.

Reservations for the dinner are available here.