Gab Chabrán
covers what's happening in food and culture for LAist.
Published September 29, 2023 5:00 AM
Tiffani Thiessen digs deep into leftovers in her new cookbook.
(
Rebecca Sanabria
)
Topline:
Actress and TV personality Tiffani Thiessen wants to make leftovers cool again with her new cookbook, Here We Go Again.
Why now: Like many of us, Thiessen avoided the supermarket during the pandemic to protect her family from the COVID virus. Being forced to stretch her groceries as far as they could go unlocked a core memory of growing up in Long Beach when her budget-conscious mother took the previous night’s leftovers and reinvented them into new dishes.
Why it's important: Food waste is a real issue, with nearly 40% of America’s food thrown out. It also creates large amounts of emissions, the main cause of climate change. Thiessen teaches her children about it and hopes to share it with the rest of the world.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This article originally appeared in September, but we figured you may be searching for leftover recipes this time of year, so we're republishing it. Enjoy!
Tiffani Thiessen is no stranger to nostalgia. To many, like myself, who grew up watching her as Kelly Kapowski on Saved By The Bell and as Valerie Malone in Beverly Hills 90210 — two shows that dominated the teen television scene during the late '80s and early '90s — she was a symbol of the time's youth culture. But these days, Thiessen can be found making waves in the kitchen instead of scripted television.
For her second cookbook, Here We Go Again, Thiessen conjures up recipes made from what many of us already have in our refrigerators — leftovers, with a retro vibe to jog our collective memories of a simpler time.
Her recipes include a "Pizza For Breakfast Sandwich" made with leftover pizza, a fried egg, and prosciutto, and "Cornbread Skillet Sloppy Joes" which uses leftover tomato paste and shredded cheese — two things that I always seem to have in my fridge.
One specific recipe, her retro ambrosia salad made up of chunks of pineapple, cherries, clementine oranges, multicolored marshmallows, and whipped cream, is the updated version of what my aunt made for birthdays and potlucks growing up. Thiessen’s 2023 version (which currently has 74K likes on TikTok) uses fresh fruit and Greek yogurt instead of the marshmallow cream and canned fruit cocktail I ate as a child (and sometimes still crave.)
Growing up in Long Beach, her love of cooking took shape from watching the women in her family preparing meals.
“I would always watch my mother and grandmother and aunt, all the women in my family, cooking in the kitchen together,” she reminisces. “And I just wanted to be with them.”
“It was me as a little girl, wanting to hang out with the cool women in my family and doing what they were doing.”
Tiffani Thiessen from her cookbook "Here We Go Again."
(
Rebecca Sanabria
)
Her interest in food grew while traveling to promote her acting work, and she was regularly exposed to different cooking styles and cultures. Meanwhile, the Food Network and Cooking Channel constantly played in the background at home.
On a trip with her family one day to the Chelsea Market in New York, she noticed the Food Network offices were housed in the same building. She requested a meeting, which resulted in Dinner at Tiffani’s, which ran for three seasons on the Cooking Channel from 2015-2017, followed by her first cookbook, Pull Up a Chair: Recipes from My Family to Yours (2018).
For the love of leftovers
When she began thinking about her next book, the concept of leftovers was appealing due to how she was raised. It also presented a personal challenge because her husband, actor and artist Brady Smith, wasn't a big fan of next-day dishes.
“It was a funny book to do, to prove to him that leftovers can be cool and awesome,” Thiessen says.
As she explains, leftovers took center stage for her at the beginning of the pandemic, when a routine grocery store trip meant a potentially hazardous exposure to the COVID virus. As a result. she was forced to use what she already had in her home, trying to find ways to cook with those ingredients for as long as possible.
It was then a core memory unlocked for Thiessen. She recalled growing up with her family on a tight budget, her father working two jobs to support her and her two brothers. Her stay-at-home mom would get creative in the kitchen with whatever was on hand, looking for ways to reinvent food to save money.
The Pizza for Breakfast Sandwich.
(
Rebecca Sanabria
)
“Any sort of protein was usually made into some sort of awesome tacos or enchiladas, or even in [went into] our omelets the next day,” she says. Rice was another ingredient that would never go to waste, she says, her mother often using it to make rice pudding.
Another motivating factor was food waste. According to Feeding America, 119 billion pounds of food in the United States annually is wasted, translating to nearly 40% of America’s food supply.
It's also a significant contributing factor to climate change. The U.S. Department of Agriculture says the amount of carbon dioxide emissions from food waste in the U.S. each year equals the annual emissions of 42 coal-fired power plants. For Thiessen, using leftovers was not only a personal cause but an existential one.
So, her idea was to write a cookbook of recipes to help home cooks use what they already have rather than throwing food in the trash.
Childhood memories
Upon hearing the subject matter of Thiessen’s book, I was immediately intrigued. As an avid home cook, I attempt at least three to four dinners weekly for myself and my family. It also brought back some memories from my childhood as well.
I remember being constantly amazed by my father, who cooked a lot of our meals, being able to whip up whatever we had on hand, giving it a cute name such as “tofu magnifico,” a stir-fry dish that he’d throw together using leftovers from the previous night’s Chinese take out and whatever produce was on hand. In many ways, even today, I still strive to knock out a dish, short-order-cook status, on the fly.
Thiessen’s recipes in Here We Go Again have clearly been created to appeal to elder millennials and Gen-Xers like myself. The pages take on a retro-thrift store chic in their look and feel, with heavily color-saturated pictures resembling Kodachrome film with images of the prepared dishes against vintage wallpaper.
Those retro vibes led Thiessen to reach out to bookseller Matt Miller. Miller owns Kitchen Lingo in Long Beach, near Thiessen’s childhood home. Miller specializes in vintage and antiquarian cookbooks and food writing.
“I think every book, especially a cookbook, has a story to tell. When you have a cookbook and cook from it, you rarely do it for yourself. Most people cook for other people. So you have this real connection to people cooking for families. Cooking for friends, cooking for parties.” says Miller.
Retro Ambrosia Salad.
(
Rebecca Sanabria
)
Thiessen contacted Miller after sliding into his DMs. When he saw he had Thiessen as a new follower, he automatically thought it was a fake account. But he sent her a message when he realized it was her, not a bot. Thiessen responded, and the two quickly bonded over cooking and cookbooks.
To Miller, the concept of leftovers is a highly accessible one. “I think it makes it easier for most people to approach. Everyone has a leftover pizza slice in their fridge at some time. Everybody's got something left over that needs to be reinvented,” Miller explains.
Leftovers’ legacy
Leftover cookbooks aren’t exactly something new. Miller has a book for sale in his shop published in the 1940s titled 500 Delicious Dishes From Leftovers, compiled by the Culinary Arts Institute. For context, the difference between leftovers from the 1940s and today has much to do with the size of your refrigerator.
“If you were fortunate enough to have a lot of food left over, refrigerators weren't as big. So you had to find something to do with it. Otherwise, your food was going to go bad. People didn’t waste as much then,” says Miller.
When asked what Thiessen hopes people will take away from her cookbook, she compares it to when her husband begins one of his murals. “I try to relate to when he looks at an empty canvas with a ton of color on the floor. And I was like, where do you start? This book helps you start with what you already have in your fridge in your pantry,” she says.
Gasoline prices fell below $4 a gallon Tuesday for the first time in three months — but the overall cost of living remains stubbornly high.
More details: The average price of gasoline dipped below $4 a gallon Tuesday for the first time in three months, according to AAA. The price of regular gas has fallen by 38 cents in the last month to a national average of $3.98. The overall cost of living, however, remains stubbornly high. Consumer prices in October were up 0.4% from the previous month, according to a report Tuesday from the Labor Department. That's a bigger monthly increase than forecasters had expected.
Why gas prices are falling: The drop in gasoline prices in recent weeks is thanks to a combination of falling crude oil prices, refineries' switch to a cheaper blend of winter fuel, and the typical seasonal drop in demand for gas.
Read on... for more on gas prices and heating oil prices.
Inflation-scarred consumers are finding a bit of relief these days at an unlikely place: the gas pump.
The average price of gasoline dipped below $4 a gallon Tuesday for the first time in three months, according to AAA. The price of regular gas has fallen by 38 cents in the last month to a national average of $3.98.
The overall cost of living, however, remains stubbornly high. Consumer prices in October were up 0.4% from the previous month, according to a report Tuesday from the Labor Department. That's a bigger monthly increase than forecasters had expected.
Rising housing costs accounted for about a third of the monthly increase. Grocery prices were also up sharply during the month.
Why gas prices are falling
The drop in gasoline prices in recent weeks is thanks to a combination of falling crude oil prices, refineries' switch to a cheaper blend of winter fuel, and the typical seasonal drop in demand for gas.
"Temperatures are getting colder," says Patrick De Haan, petroleum analyst for GasBuddy. "People who have boats and RVs are probably done for the year. I would say, by Thanksgiving, so long as we don't get any wild cards geopolitically, the national average could be $3.75 a gallon."
Gas prices are still at a record high for this time of year, however — about a dollar a gallon higher than when the U.S. went to war with Iran. Even with the recent drop in prices, this year's drive to grandma's for Thanksgiving could be the most expensive ever.
Diesel prices have also fallen, but more slowly than gas prices. AAA says the average price of diesel fuel is $6.15 a gallon, down about 13 cents from a month ago.
The high cost of diesel fuel is another byproduct of the war — not only the U.S. war with Iran but also Russia's war with Ukraine. Russia is ordinarily a big exporter of diesel fuel, but that supply has largely dried up because of damage to Russia's refineries.
"When a country like Russia isn't exporting diesel, that is very impactful for the global market. So diesel prices – they will come down but they will still remain very elevated," De Haan says.
Heating oil prices are also high
Rising diesel prices are also driving up the cost of heating oil in the northeast, because heating oil is a close cousin of diesel.
Mild fall weather has kept heating costs in check so far, but De Haan says a blast of cold air could push heating oil prices even higher.
Higher diesel prices also affect the cost of other goods that have to be moved by truck or train or cargo ship.
"You're starting to see higher freight costs get passed through," says economist Mike Reid of RBC Capital Markets. "We've seen it show up notably in goods that are heavily imported — apparel, recreation goods, IT equipment."
In a speech Tuesday before the inflation release, Federal Reserve Chris Waller suggested that energy shocks could have more lasting effects on inflation that previously though. Waller suggested the central bank may need to raise interest rates more aggressively to curb price hikes than markets had previously expected.
No annual comparison for inflation this time
While Tuesday's inflation report shows how much prices rose in the last month, it does not include the typical reading on how prices have changed over the last year. That's a casualty of last year's government shutdown, which idled hundreds of government price-checkers so prices from October 2025 were never recorded for comparison.
The Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank estimated before Tuesday's release that consumer prices in October were up 3.7% from a year ago. That would outstrip average wage gains of just 3.1% during the year, so the typical worker is losing buying power. That's a big reason for the heavy turnout in last week's mid-term elections. 49.1% of eligible voters took part in the election, the second highest total for any midterm in more than a century.
Campaign signs in support of Proposition 40 and opposing Propositions 41 and 42 at a rally in Los Angeles on Oct. 5, 2026.
(
Jae C. Hong
/
AP Photo
)
Topline:
California will not become the first state to levy a wealth tax on its richest residents — at least not this election.
Why now: Voters rejected Proposition 40, a proposal to tax billionaires based on their net worth and financial holdings, by 52.8% to 47.2%, according to the Associated Press Monday. The measure had trailed behind for days before the Associated Press confirmed results.
Billionaire tax divided Democrats: From the outset, Prop. 40 revealed divisions among the Democratic Party and galvanized some of Silicon Valley’s wealthiest executives to spend hundreds of millions to defeat it. Gov. Gavin Newsom became one of its earliest opponents, attempting through backroom negotiations to keep it off of the ballot altogether. He endorsed the billionaire-backed counter measure, Prop. 42, designed to ban all wealth taxes in California and kill Prop. 40. Newsom, along with Democratic allies such as Planned Parenthood of California and California Teachers Association, argued a one-time tax would not solve the state’s fiscal woes and would drive wealthy residents out of state.
Read on... for more on Prop. 40.
California will not become the first state to levy a wealth tax on its richest residents — at least not this election.
Voters rejected Proposition 40, a proposal to tax billionaires based on their net worth and financial holdings, by 52.8% to 47.2%, according to The Associated Press Monday. The measure had trailed behind for days before The Associated Press confirmed results.
Leaders for Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, the union pushing the measure, seemed to concede the race minutes before the polls closed but vowed to try again in 2028 if California’s Legislature “fails to deliver a real solution” to fund healthcare hammered by recent federal law.
“That’s not a hypothetical. That’s our plan,” said Dave Regan, president of SEIU-UHW.
Election Day was projected to be an all-around defeat for the union, known for aggressively pursuing ballot measures. Voters defeated union-backed Proposition 44, an effort to control how clinics spend money. Proposition 42, a billionaire tax countermeasure prohibiting future wealth taxes, was leading Monday evening by 51.6% to 48.4%. That measure could get in the way of SEIU-UHW’s future plans to try taxing wealth again.
The billionaire tax would have generated $100 billion for healthcare and education through a one-time, 5% tax on billionaires, according to SEIU-UHW. Opponents of the measure celebrated its defeat.
“Proposition 40 was a reckless experiment conducted on our state’s economy with little regard for the harms it would cause,” according to a statement from Evan Westrop, a campaign strategist for No on Prop. 40.
The opposition campaign, which was backed by wealthy tech investors and healthcare organizations, argued the measure had already driven billionaires from the state and permanently harmed income tax revenue. On Monday they said the state still faces “enormous pressure” to find other ways to fund healthcare hit by federal cuts.
Billionaire tax divided Democrats
From the outset, Prop. 40 revealed divisions among the Democratic Party and galvanized some of Silicon Valley’s wealthiest executives to spend hundreds of millions to defeat it.
Gov. Gavin Newsom became one of its earliest opponents, attempting through backroom negotiations to keep it off of the ballot altogether. He endorsed the billionaire-backed counter measure, Prop. 42, designed to ban all wealth taxes in California and kill Prop. 40. Newsom, along with Democratic allies such as Planned Parenthood of California and California Teachers Association, argued a one-time tax would not solve the state’s fiscal woes and would drive wealthy residents out of state.
The California Democratic Party and California Federation of Labor Unions supported the initiative and opposed its counter measures, arguing the state needed more revenue to shield workers and everyday Californians from the effects of dramatic federal healthcare cuts expected to kick 2 million residents off of health insurance.
Lorena Gonzalez, former Assemblymember and president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, said Prop. 40’s failure puts even more pressure on state and federal lawmakers to backfill federal Medicaid cuts.
Supporters of Prop. 40 blamed its loss on billionaires vastly outspending the Yes campaign, which raised $33.5 million.
“That is incredibly corrosive and corrupting to our democracy and our political system, and that's been dominating the discussion here in California,” Regan said.
Billionaires poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the campaign to stop Prop. 40. Google co-founder Sergey Brin led the charge, publicly moving out of state and donating $102 million to Building a Better California, a political committee he founded to oppose the tax. The group has served as a passthrough for other billionaire donors to oppose Prop. 40, including by funding the counterpropositions 41 and 42. Collectively, ultra-wealthy opponents donated $378.4 million to oppose the billionaire tax.
In a statement, Abby Lunardini, a spokesperson for Building a Better California, said the billionaire tax threatened to limit revenue for all services in California, including healthcare, by driving economic interests out of the state.
“It was a lose-lose for California, and voters clearly agreed,” Lunardini said.
Ultimately, opponents’ efforts succeeded.
Polling just ahead of the election indicated falling support for Prop. 40 despite growing sentiment for taxing billionaires more in general. According to a UC Berkeley Citrin-POLITICO poll, 45% of voters believed in taxing billionaires more to fund public services compared to 35% who believed the state should prioritize keeping billionaires in state because of the tax revenue and jobs they generate — but just 46% favored Prop. 40.
Infighting among Democrats could have also contributed to Prop. 40’s demise, said John Matsusaka, an economist and direct democracy expert at USC, ahead of the election. Research shows money doesn’t buy people’s votes or values on core issues like abortion, Matsusaka said, but it can exploit uncertainty.
“People these days are very tribal. When your tribe is arguing, people start to listen to the counterarguments,” Matsusaka said.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
What's in the letter LA leaders gave the hospital?
By Laura Anaya-Morga | Boyle Heights Beat
Published November 10, 2026 9:29 AM
Sen. Maria Elena Durazo greets Daniel Fontoura, president at Adventist Health White Memorial, to hand deliver a letter demanding that the hospital not cooperate with federal immigration operations on Nov. 7, 2026.
(
Steve Saldivar
/
The LA Local
)
Topline:
A letter calls on hospital leaders to explain their response and strengthen protocols to protect patients and staff after ICE agents blocked the ambulance entrance and clashed with protesters.
Why now: After an hourslong, late-night standoff between Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and community members outside Adventist Health White Memorial over the weekend, local leaders are demanding answers from hospital leadership. The hospital has previously faced scrutiny over claims that its administrators have allowed federal immigration agents to interfere in patient care.
More details: On Saturday, state Sen. María Elena Durazo marched with community members from Mariachi Plaza to the hospital to hand-deliver a letter to White Memorial President Daniel Fontoura. The letter, signed by elected officials and community leaders, calls for an end to any collaboration that may exist between the hospital and federal immigration agents.
Read on... for more on the letter that L.A. leaders delivered to White Memorial after ICE activity.
After an hourslong, late-night standoff between Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and community members outside Adventist Health White Memorial over the weekend, local leaders are demanding answers from hospital leadership.
The hospital has previously faced scrutiny over claims that its administrators have allowed federal immigration agents to interfere in patient care.
On Saturday, state Sen. María Elena Durazo marched with community members from Mariachi Plaza to the hospital to hand-deliver a letter to White Memorial President Daniel Fontoura. The letter, signed by elected officials and community leaders, calls for an end to any collaboration that may exist between the hospital and federal immigration agents.
The night before, ICE agents clashed with protesters near the hospital and blocked the hospital’s ambulance entrance. According to White Memorial, ambulances were diverted for about two hours during the incident. Two U.S. citizens were also detained by federal agents.
Federal immigration agents were at White Memorial Friday night because someone in their custody had been taken to the emergency room, according to hospital officials and the Los Angeles Police Department.
“What happened last night was unacceptable,” Durazo told Fontoura in the parking lot of White Memorial, steps away from where ICE agents had been standing shoulder to shoulder just hours earlier. “It’s unacceptable that ICE would go into our healthcare facilities. But we also believe that White Memorial can and should do more.”
Fontoura told the group that the hospital has “no special relationship, no special contract” with ICE. “When they show up, they show up,” Fontoura said, referring to the federal agents.
Fontoura said hospital staff took care of the person who was brought in by ICE and claimed they denied the agents’ request to “break protocol” and be in the same room as the patient and their physician. “We said no,” Fontoura said.
Boyle Heights Beat asked White Memorial whether these privacy protections are standard practice and whether federal agents follow them while at the hospital. The hospital did not respond before publication.
Last year, Adventist Health released a six-point statement outlining its policies to protect detained patients and support staff, but doctors and advocates at the time said it was not enough.
Now Durazo and others are calling for more accountability and stricter guidelines from the hospital on how they respond to ICE activity.
Here are the demands listed in Durazo’s letter
Provide a detailed, written account of what happened, explaining why agents were allowed to block the ambulance entrance, what measures hospital leadership took to address their presence, and whether emergency access or patient care was compromised.
Implement and enforce procedures to prevent immigration agents from obstructing emergency entrances, address their presence on hospital grounds, and restrict access to patient rooms and nonpublic areas.
Clarify the hospital’s coordination with ICE and ensure that immigration agents do not interfere with medical decisions, patient privacy, or communications between medical professionals, patients, and their families.
Provide doctors, nurses and hospital staff with nurses, and hospital staff with clear written protocols, training and administrative support when they advocate for their patients.
Issue a public statement in both English and Spanish reaffirming the hospital’s commitment to caring for its patients, regardless of immigration status.
The letter requests a written response from hospital leadership by Nov. 21. It is signed by Durazo, Assemblymember Mark Gonzalez, Mayor-elect Nithya Raman, Councilmember Ysabel Jurado and other community leaders from Proyecto Pastoral, CHIRLA and more.
White Memorial has not responded to Boyle Heights Beat’s request for comment on the letter.
If the concerns remain unresolved, those who signed the letter say they will ask the California attorney general to review White Memorial’s compliance with state law.
“For ICE to show up the way they did, it takes a much higher level of consciousness and determination by the hospital to stop them from doing this,” Durazo told Boyle Heights Beat after the rally on Saturday. “We don’t have absolute power over ICE, we know that, but we do have some power over ICE.”
Jordan Rynning
holds local government accountable, covering city halls, law enforcement and other powerful institutions.
Published November 10, 2026 8:00 AM
Precincts won by L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, left, are shown in blue. Mayor-elect Nithya Raman's wins are in yellow.
(
Jill Connelly/Etienne Laurent
/
Associated Press/Getty Images
)
Topline:
Nithya Raman turned the tide in the L.A. mayoral race by winning over large swathes of the city that voted for Karen Bass in 2022, according to an LAist analysis of election data.
Breaking down the vote: Raman had overwhelming support from Hollywood through downtown and across the East side. She also won majority support in areas like Van Nuys and North Hollywood that voted for Bass in the 2022 general and 2026 primary elections.Bass made her biggest gains in the Pacific Palisades, South Valley and San Pedro — drawing voters from areas that supported Rick Caruso in 2022 and Spencer Pratt in the 2026 primary.
Read on . . . for a more detailed view of how precincts voted.
Nithya Raman turned the tide in the L.A. mayoral race by winning over large swathes of the city that voted for Karen Bass in 2022, according to an LAist analysis of election data.
Bass was a favorite in many areas that voted for Rick Caruso when she faced him in 2022. She held onto a majority of voters across South L.A., but lost much of her previous support. She outperformed Raman in areas where Spencer Pratt, the third-place primary finisher, saw strong turnout in June.
The switchup came after Bass — a veteran in progressive politics — took a relatively-conservative approach on issues like policing and high-density housing developments compared to Raman, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
About the tallies so far
Election data in this analysis includes 793,692 votes recorded by the L.A. County Registrar of Voters in precinct-level data as of Nov. 9. More than 1 million votes were cast in the L.A. mayoral race across the city. This story will be updated as additional precinct-level data is made available by county election officials.
Caruso and Pratt majority votes are showing in purple. Bass is in blue and Raman in yellow.
How to reach me
If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is jrynning.56.
You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.