Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • A massive fleet of buses will get people to venues
    A general view as the LED screen, depicting the LA28 Olympics logo, is seen whilst Casey Wasserman, LA28 Chairperson and President, and Karen Bass, Mayor of Los Angeles, speak at the LA28 Press Conference on August 10, 2024 in Paris, France.
    Casey Wasserman, LA28 Chairperson and President, and Karen Bass, Mayor of Los Angeles, speak at the LA28 Press Conference in Paris on Aug. 10.

    Topline:

    Karen Bass says the upcoming 2028 "no car" Olympics means venues will only be accessible by public transportation.

    What it'll take: It will take more than 3,000 buses and LA 2028 organizers will need to bring them in from all over the country.

    Why now: Mayor Bass is in Paris for the closing ceremony of the 2024 games, where she will receive the Olympic flag officially passing the mantle of host from Paris to LA.

    What's next: To accomplish the "no car" Olympics Bass says the city will ask for businesses to allow their employees to work from home during the 17-day Olympic period.

    Go deeper: The 2024 Paris Olympics are coming to an end. Watch the final events and get excited for the 2028 LA Olympics

    Karen Bass has announced the upcoming 2028 Olympics will be "no-car games," meaning venues will only be accessible by public transportation.

    At a news conference in Paris Saturday, Mayor Bass said a goal for the games will be to make it more easily accessible by eliminating cars from the equation.

    Bass said venues will be only accessible by public transportation. It will take more than 3,000 buses, according to the Associated Press, which Bass said will be brought in from all over the country.

    Mayor Bass is in Paris for the closing ceremony of the 2024 games, where she will receive the Olympic flag officially passing the mantle of host from Paris to LA.

    Mayor Bass and Casey Wasserman, chairman of the LA Olympics 2028 organizing committee, highlighted some of the planning that's begun for the event.

    "We’re already working to create jobs by expanding our public transportation system in order for us to have a no-car games,” Bass told the press.

    To accomplish the "no-car" Olympics, Bass says the city will request businesses allow their employees to work from home during the 17-day Olympic period.

  • Families can take free rides during heat wave
    A grassy area with picnic tables and large trees at sunset. A small body of water is pictured in the distance.
    Free transportation to the Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area swim beach will be available this week as East LA families continue to seek relief from another heat wave and the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire.


    Topline:

    Free transportation to the Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area swim beach will be available this week as East LA families continue to seek relief from another heat wave and the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire.

    Why now: More than a month after the Lineage Logistics warehouse fire, many residents continue to report persistent odors from rotting food and cleanup efforts. Because of the ongoing air quality concerns and community complaints, Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation has canceled its local aquatic programming.

    Free rides begin Wednesday: Los Angeles County is offering complimentary transportation Wednesday through Saturday to the Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area Swim Beach in Irwindale. Pickup locations are at select Eastside parks.

    Read on . . . for more information on the free shuttle services, schedules and more. 

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Free transportation to the Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area swim beach will be available this week as East LA families continue to seek relief from another heat wave and the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire.

    Los Angeles County is offering complimentary transportation Wednesday through Saturday at select Eastside parks so residents can enjoy a day at the lake at no cost.

    More than a month after the Lineage Logistics warehouse fire, many residents continue to report persistent odors from rotting food and cleanup efforts. Because of the ongoing air quality concerns and community complaints, Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation has canceled its local aquatic programming.

    To ensure families still have access to summer recreational activities, Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda L. Solis directed resources toward providing the “beach bus” program to Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area Swim Beach in Irwindale.

    Read below for more information on the free shuttle services, schedules and more. 

    Pickup locations

    Belvedere Aquatic Center

    5035 1st St. East Los Angeles, CA 90022

    Obregon Park Pool

    4021 1st St. Los Angeles, CA 90063

    Salazar Park Pool 

    3864 Whittier Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90023

    City Terrace Park Pool

    1126 N. Hazard Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90063

    Shuttle dates and times 

    • Wednesday, July 22
    • Thursday, July 23
    • Friday, July 24
    • Saturday, July 25

    Morning trip: 

    • Check in at 8:30 a.m. 
    • The bus departs East LA at 9 a.m. 
    • The bus leaves Santa Fe Dam to go back to East LA at 12 p.m.

    Afternoon trip: 

    • Check in at 12:30 p.m. 
    • The bus departs East LA at 1 p.m. 
    • The bus leaves Santa Fe Dam to go back to East LA at 4 p.m. 

    What to know

    No registration or proof of address is required, but children under 12 must be accompanied by an adult. Bring your own food and drinks. Space is limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis.

  • Sponsored message
  • President set for new role after $12M settlement
    Two students wearing backpacks walk across a courtyard on a college campus. The courtyard is surrounded by beige, multi-story buildings.
    Cal State San Bernardino campus on April 22, 2024.

    Topline:

    Cal State San Bernardino's outgoing president, one of two administrators at the center of a multi-million dollar discrimination lawsuit, may transfer to a different Cal State job while the university pays his salary and benefits. The Cal State Board of Trustees will review the transition plan and decide whether to approve the president’s emeritus status Wednesday.

    Discrimination lawsuit: Cal State recently spent $12 million settling the lawsuit in which two female employees at Cal State San Bernardino said they were harassed and discriminated against based on their gender by two male university administrators: Cal State San Bernardino president Tomás Morales and former Palm Desert satellite campus dean Jake Zhu. The two women, Clare Weber and Anissa Rogers, both formerly worked as high-ranking administrators at Cal State San Bernardino. During the 2021-22 school year, Weber and Rogers each confronted their male supervisors with what they believed was strong evidence of a gender pay gap and sex-based bullying in their workplaces. Both were pressured to resign almost immediately, they alleged in a 2023 lawsuit that calls the Cal State system a “cesspool of gender harassment and discrimination."

    What's next for Morales: The proposed new job and salary for Cal State San Bernardino President Tomás Morales will be announced at the Wednesday meeting. Morales is slated to get an executive transition package that would enable him to retreat to faculty and stay on the university’s payroll until he starts another Cal State job. San Bernardino’s chapter of the California Faculty Association urged the board of trustees not to approve executive transition benefits for Morales in a May statement. Morales received $655,626 in pay and benefits in 2024, the most recent figure available from TransparentCalifornia.

    An outgoing California State University president, one of two administrators at the center of a multi-million dollar discrimination lawsuit, may transfer to a different Cal State job while the university pays his salary and benefits. The Cal State Board of Trustees will review the transition plan and decide whether to approve the president’s emeritus status Wednesday.

    The proposed new job and salary for Cal State San Bernardino President Tomás Morales will be announced at the Wednesday meeting, according to Cal State spokesperson Amy Bentley-Smith. Morales received $655,626 in pay and benefits in 2024, the most recent figure available from TransparentCalifornia.

    Cal State recently spent $12 million settling the lawsuit in which two female employees at Cal State San Bernardino said they were harassed and discriminated against based on their gender by two male university administrators: Morales and former Palm Desert campus dean Jake Zhu. Cal State continues to deny any wrongdoing. Zhu is an emeritus faculty member, a title given as a gesture of appreciation for service contributed to the university, and Morales remains in good standing with the university.

    Morales resigned at the end of the school year and, because of his good standing, is eligible to receive a coveted executive transition package with faculty retreat rights. That means he can continue to work as a university faculty member.

    This Wednesday, a Cal State Board of Trustees committee will view a presentation on Morales’ transition plan. Later that day, the full board will discuss Chancellor Mildred Garcia’s recommendation to grant him the title of president emeritus.

    A ‘cesspool of gender harassment and discrimination’

    The two women, Clare Weber and Anissa Rogers, both formerly worked as high-ranking administrators at Cal State San Bernardino. Weber was appointed deputy provost and vice provost of Academic Affairs on the main campus in 2017, and Rogers served as associate dean at the satellite campus in Palm Desert starting in 2019. During the 2021-22 school year, Weber and Rogers each confronted their male supervisors with what they believed was strong evidence of a gender pay gap and sex-based bullying in their workplaces. Both were pressured to resign almost immediately, they alleged in a 2023 lawsuit that calls the Cal State system a “cesspool of gender harassment and discrimination.”

    Rogers, then-associate dean at Palm Desert working under Zhu, was terrified a firing would ruin her reputation and career prospects, and agreed to resign. Weber, then-vice provost of academic affairs, refused and was fired.

    In their joint lawsuit, they sued the Cal State Board of Trustees, Zhu and Morales.

    “The lawsuit shows systemic, sexist bullying,” Weber said in an interview. “It was primarily from President Morales.”

    Bentley-Smith said the university system has already thoroughly reviewed all of the lawsuit’s allegations and resolved the matter through the settlement.

    Weber and Rogers have submitted a public comment to the board of trustees imploring them to scrutinize Morales’ “good standing” before approving the proposed transition plan.

    Cal State president accused of berating women

    The lawsuit alleged Morales was notorious for routinely harassing and acting aggressively toward female Cal State employees. He ranted at women, excessively criticized and undermined them, attempted to intimidate them, and held women to higher standards than men, the suit complaint read.

    But faculty concerns about Morales began years before the lawsuit. A 2016 survey revealed that over 60% of Cal State San Bernardino employees felt the campus climate had worsened under Morales’ tenure. The faculty senate wrote in a 2017 resolution of “no confidence” in Morales’ performance that the survey results indicated an environment of toxicity, fear and distrust had formed under Morales’ tenure, which they added was rife with bullying, favoritism and retaliation.

    Two months before his appointment as Cal State San Bernardino’s president in 2012, while Morales served as president of the College of Staten Island, more than half of that college’s senators also approved a resolution of “no confidence” in his leadership.

    “It was a ‘his way or the highway’ vibe, particularly for women. I was berated and put down and yelled at. I had other colleagues that experienced the same thing,” Weber said.

    Walking on eggshells around Morales caused her stress and made it difficult to do her job, Weber said.

    “Sometimes I got to feeling isolated, like I was the only one, and I think probably other women did too,” Weber said.

    In late May 2022, a California State University Employees Union study demonstrated that white male Cal State employees earn about 3% more than men of color, 5% more than white women and 7% more than women of color.

    Weber wanted to see if a similar pattern applied to her job. She conducted research, consulted a compensation specialist in the campus’ human resources office, and determined that she was the lowest-paid female vice provost in the Cal State system. She also found that, with the exception of one female, and one male who made about $3,000 less than Weber, every female Cal State vice provost made less than every male vice provost.

    Weber met with her boss, then-interim Provost Rafik Mohamed, in June 2022, where she planned to discuss her concerns over the pay gap she’d identified.

    “I was scared,” she said. “I had my data, I had notes ahead of time. I wrote little encouraging messages to myself before I was in the meeting.”

    At the same time, she felt she had reason to be hopeful. She’d just spearheaded and secured the university’s regional accreditation, kicked off a new strategic plan, and, only a few weeks before, earned the highest possible score on a mid-year performance review: “exceptional leadership.”

    At the meeting, Mohamed attempted to assign her additional job duties, the suit alleged. In response, Weber asked for a 12% equity raise and suggested there was a pay disparity among genders at the university.

    Mohamed told her he would pass the concerns along. Weber also emailed the university president, Morales, with the same raise request. Four weeks later, Mohamed told Weber she would have to resign, with Mohamed stating he “could not” work with Weber, the suit alleged.

    Weber wrote an email to Morales protesting.

    “I explicitly raised concerns that these female Vice Provosts were being paid less because of their gender,” she wrote. “I have been shocked and saddened that CSU’s response to my complaints was to subject me to unprecedented and unwarranted criticism and then – just a month later – ask me to ‘resign’ from my position. This is highly offensive and totally discriminatory, and retaliatory.”

    She asked Morales to rescind the resignation request and open an investigation into the pay equity concerns.

    Weber was fired the next day, she said. She retreated to a faculty position as required by her original appointment letter.

    Mohamed did not respond to CalMatters’ request for comment.

    Morales’ office referred CalMatters to the Cal State San Bernardino Office of Marketing and Communications, which did not respond to a request for comment.

    Discrimination also alleged at Palm Desert campus

    Cal State San Bernardino hired Rogers in 2019 as an associate dean — her dream job.

    “When I interviewed, it was perfect,” Rogers said. “Then I quickly realized that I had just been immersed in hell.”

    From day one, Rogers said she perceived the culture at San Bernardino’s Palm Desert campus as male-driven and discriminatory. The campus dean, Zhu, stuck out to her in particular with his penchant for screaming at people, especially women.

    Men who worked for him would model his behaviors in his presence and at staff meetings, even those who were normally kind and supportive, Rogers said. Women struggled to speak up in meetings without being interrupted, yelled at, called “too emotional” and “sensitive,” or belittled, she said. By contrast, men were always treated with respect, she said. Eventually, Rogers said she gave up presenting her own ideas and began sneaking them in through a male colleague, from whom the ideas were often accepted.

    In addition, several employees declared in the lawsuit under penalty of perjury that Zhu would publicly treat Rogers like a secretary or assistant, though she was the second-highest ranking employee on the satellite campus.

    “It was awful,” Rogers said. “I hated going to work every day. My anxiety increased. I was constantly on guard.”

    Tensions boiled over at an informal meeting with the dean and several of Rogers’ colleagues in October 2021, at which Rogers was not present. According to various attendees who reported back to Rogers during the meeting via text and later that day in person, several men ganged up on a female interim associate dean, interrogating her for around 25 minutes about her preparations for an upcoming campus visit with a Cal State trustee. Zhu watched the verbal onslaught and did not act, various female employees who walked out of the meeting in protest alleged.

    That same day, Rogers approached Zhu in his office and told him Cal State needed to do a better job at disrupting sexism. Zhu told her she could train the men to behave differently, the suit states, though the male employees involved reported to the dean. Zhu told a different faculty member who complained to him about the meeting, social work department chair Deirdre Lanesskog, that the men were probably just trying to impress him, the suit alleged.

    An employee said under penalty of perjury in the lawsuit that Jolene Koester, who served as Cal State’s interim chancellor from 2022 to 2023, worked for Cal State to “coach” Zhu in late October 2021. A few days after approaching Zhu, Rogers also reported to Koester that Zhu exhibited sexist conduct and bullying.

    In November 2021, Mohamed instructed Rogers to tell colleagues she was resigning, citing a “leadership issue” he did not elaborate on, according to the lawsuit. He told her that was her only option if she hoped for career advancement, the suit states. On January 1, 2022, she resigned and retreated to faculty.

    “I call it fired,” Rogers said. “They told me, ‘Either leave or you will be fired.’”

    The joint lawsuit by Weber and Rogers split into two trial proceedings. A jury awarded Rogers $6 million in damages in October 2025 and Weber settled for $6 million in lieu of a trial. In court, Zhu defended his leadership techniques and said he treated everybody in the same way.

    “I raised voices to make a point, to change the tones, not in the malicious way or discriminatory way,” he said according to court transcripts.

    While testifying, Mohamed admitted that he did not report various complaints regarding Zhu’s alleged gender mistreatment because he saw the accusations as “low-grade bias,” despite being a mandated reporter of sexual harassment under Cal State policy.

    “Everybody has bias. We all harbor biases that are just ingrained in us from how we’re socialized, how we are brought up, the environments that we were reared in,” Mohamed said. “The allegation of bias in and of itself, in my view, does not require a reporting of bias, an alleged bias to Title IX. It’s the action on that bias that triggers that requirement to report.”

    Mohamed did not reply to a request for comment on his role in either of Rogers’ and Webers’ departures. Mohamed announced his retirement on July 16 in an internal email to faculty reviewed by CalMatters.

    Zhu did not respond to CalMatters’ request for comment.

    Executive transition package up for approval

    After Zhu retired in June 2023, he retreated to faculty and is now an emeritus faculty member.

    Morales is slated to get an executive transition package that would enable him to retreat to faculty and stay on the university’s payroll until he starts another Cal State job. All university executives who complete this program must remain in good standing at the start and throughout the transition assignment, according to a 2022 trustee agenda item.

    Executives are rendered ineligible if it is found that they violated university policy or engaged in serious misconduct, per the item.

    San Bernardino’s chapter of the California Faculty Association urged the board of trustees not to approve executive transition benefits for Morales in a May statement.

    The lawsuit “raises serious questions about whether President Morales should be regarded in good standing for those benefits,” said Thomas Corrigan, a communication and media professor and the union chapter’s communications coordinator. “Dr. Rogers’ and Dr. Weber’s case really stands out as a moral outrage with exceptional financial, reputational and human costs.”

    After Weber and Rogers filed their joint lawsuit in March 2023, Weber said, Cal State finally kickstarted its investigation into her 2022 pay gap complaint. The university system sent her a pay analysis two months later, stating there were seven vice provosts who earn a lower salary than Weber, including four men.

    The university’s analysis, Weber said, was a “sham.”

    “They had a male vice provost listed as earning zero pay. They had people that were at a lower rank than me in the comparison, people that would report to me,” Weber said.

    Weber said that Jeanne Durr, former interim associate vice president of Human Resources at Cal State San Bernardino, conducted the analysis; Durr did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

    In July 2023, the California State Auditor published a report assessing how the Cal State system responds to sexual harassment allegations. The auditor found several campuses closed sexual harassment cases without providing a reason, and did not consistently discipline perpetrators. The report listed 16 recommended reforms for the Cal State system, including developing standardized guidelines for sexual harassment investigations, regularly reviewing compliance with sexual harassment policy, and universalizing the case management system used by each campus.

    In 2024, a new law, Assembly Bill 1790, set a legal requirement for Cal State to follow the recommendations by July 1, 2026. As of July 2026, one recommendation has not been carried out: establishing a system to collect and analyze sexual harassment data from all campuses. The Chancellors’ Office plans to complete this by June 2027.

    Weber taught sociology for an additional four years at Cal State San Bernardino until she stepped down as agreed upon in the lawsuit settlement.

    “My faculty colleagues were wonderful,” Weber said. But “I would be lying if I said I wasn’t afraid when I went to campus. I had numerous panic attacks. I chartered my route around campus so that I wouldn’t run into any of the administrators that harmed me.”

    Rogers left her faculty position at the university within about two years.

    “In the end, it killed any desire I had to ever move forward in my career. I have absolutely zero interest, which is too bad. I was hoping to be at least a dean in my career trajectory, (but) I won’t touch that,” Rogers said. “I’ve lost faith in systems.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • White House admits it used keywords to kill funds
    A close up of person's hands holding a pipette with teal-colored gloves in a lab.
    University of California research professors allege federal agencies illegally canceled nearly $2 billion in research grants. A student holds a pipette in a lab at Cal State San Marcos on May 6, 2025.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration canceled $2 billion of research grants to University of California professors. Their legal team says it has proof that those terminations were unconstitutional.

    Why it matters: Federal agencies that terminated more than a thousand research grants at the University of California last year admitted that they used keywords related to diversity, gender, vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 to screen for projects that ran afoul of the Trump administration’s priorities.

    It’s an admission that lawyers for the research professors say is proof that the agencies illegally canceled nearly $2 billion in grants. And that’s a major development in a lawsuit filed by UC researchers against the Trump administration to permanently get their grants back.

    The researchers’ legal team is now asking the judge in the case to skip a trial and formally declare that the White House repeatedly violated the constitution, including the First Amendment. A court hearing on whether that’ll happen is scheduled for Oct. 20.

    The backstory: The judge in this case, Rita F. Lin, has repeatedly sided with the UC professors and issued several preliminary injunctions forcing the federal agencies to restore the grants while she reviews the full merits of the case. This includes the restoration of hundreds of grants at UCLA that the Trump administration sought to suspend over its allegations that the university tolerated antisemitism and permitted transgender women to compete on women’s sports teams.

    Read on... for more on the lawsuit.

    This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

    Federal agencies that terminated more than a thousand research grants at the University of California last year admitted that they used keywords related to diversity, gender, vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 to screen for projects that ran afoul of the Trump administration’s priorities.

    It’s an admission that lawyers for the research professors say is proof that the agencies illegally canceled nearly $2 billion in grants. And that’s a major development in a lawsuit filed by UC researchers against the Trump administration to permanently get their grants back.

    The researchers’ legal team is now asking the judge in the case to skip a trial and formally declare that the White House repeatedly violated the constitution, including the First Amendment. A court hearing on whether that'll happen is scheduled for Oct. 20.

    The federal agencies made the admission about the keywords in signed stipulations filed in federal court last week in a case called Thakur v. Trump that’s been ongoing since last spring.

    The stipulations in the court filing show the agencies “did not terminate any grants based on alleged noncompliance with the terms of the grant” and instead used “general criteria, rather than grant-specific assessment of each award’s compliance, or performance,” the lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote.

    Lawyers for the UC professors now contend that the admission proves three wide-ranging constitutional violations:

    • By using keyword searches to review hundreds of grants and terminate them en masse rather than reviewing them individually on their merits, the Trump administration targeted research it found politically disfavorable, which is a First Amendment violation.
    • In terminating 283 Department of Energy grants from states where a majority voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, and leaving untouched hundreds of grants that went to “red” states, the Trump administration wrongly punished researchers for merely living in states the White House politically opposed.
    • And by terminating billions of dollars in grants, and never rerouting that money to other grant opportunities, the Trump administration violated the constitution by not spending money in ways Congress specifically required through laws it passed on how research funds should be used.

    CalMatters emailed the U.S. Department of Justice, which acts as the legal defense for the federal agencies, on July 16 to ask whether it agrees that the federal grant-making agency stipulations mean the Trump administration violated the constitutional rights of researchers. A spokesperson for the Justice Department didn’t respond by publication time.

    History of lawsuit

    The judge in this case, Rita F. Lin, has repeatedly sided with the UC professors and issued several preliminary injunctions forcing the federal agencies to restore the grants while she reviews the full merits of the case. This includes the restoration of hundreds of grants at UCLA that the Trump administration sought to suspend over its allegations that the university tolerated antisemitism and permitted transgender women to compete on women’s sports teams.

    Those allegations were also the subject of a demand from the White House for UCLA to pay $1.2 billion or experience an additional cascade of research freezes. However, months before President Donald Trump sought that settlement, UCLA took steps to address antisemitism on campus, including commissioning a task force to recommend ways to create a more welcoming environment for Jewish students.

    Lin, a Biden appointee, faulted the administration for disregarding those efforts by UCLA in a preliminary injunction for a different but related lawsuit. The Trump administration’s justification for terminating the grants did not “mention the remedial steps UCLA had already taken to address the issues described,” Lin wrote.

    Lawyers for professors in the Thakur case now want Lin to make a final ruling, rather than a preliminary one, ordering the grants to be restored. Even if that were to happen, the federal agencies could decide to appeal Lin’s ruling to a higher court.

    The stakes are “huge,” lawyers for the professors in the Thakur case wrote. If the White House is “allowed to terminate this funding, the researchers, graduate students, and program staff that relied on the grants to pursue their lives’ work will all suffer significant damage to their reputations and careers.”

    The lawyers warn of lifesaving cures that will never be developed, new understandings of diseases that will go unexplored and the decline in the country’s global standing as an international juggernaut in publicly funded research.

    Using keywords to target disfavored grants

    The agencies admitted to using keywords in various ways, according to a CalMatters review of the new court filings.

    The Department of Transportation identified six grants for projects worth about $42 million to terminate because they sought “transportation equity,” prioritized “disadvantaged communities,” or focused on “diversifying the transportation workforce” and “equity.”

    The termination of three of those grants led by a UC Davis professor resulted in 77 researchers abandoning 79 in-progress projects. Lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote that the project leaders were also forced to lay off or scramble to replace funding for more than 40 graduate and undergraduate research assistants.

    The National Institutes of Health admitted to using an internal search tool to flag UC grants that mentioned “health equity,” "work force diversity," "structural racism," and "sexual orientation." The NIH alone suspended or canceled more than 1,000 UC grants, including nearly 700 at UCLA, related to vaccines, cancer research and disparities in health outcomes.

    That figure is newly disclosed in a court filing — last year, UCLA indicated that closer to 500 NIH grants were terminated. The health research agency also declared that it’s possible that DOGE, the short-lived federal office that billionaire Elon Musk led in 2025, used AI to target grants for termination.

    Lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote to the judge that these admissions show the agencies “identified the viewpoints they wanted to suppress, searched the grants they funded for those that expressed those viewpoints, and terminated those grants on that basis.” That violates the researchers’ First Amendment rights, the lawyers wrote.

    The Environmental Protection Agency, one of the named agencies in the suit, is in the process of settling with lawyers for the UC professors to avoid further litigation.

    A separate federal district judge in Massachusetts last week dealt the Trump administration a blow in its ability to terminate grants and withhold federal funding. The White House relied on a legal phrase in many of its funding cancellations — “no longer effectuates . . . agency priorities.”

    California and 22 other states sued, arguing that there’s no law or right for the federal government to cancel funding based on new program goals and White House desires after the grants were already awarded.

    The judge agreed.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Warehouse owner breaks silence 1 month after fire
    A large warehouse is destroyed from a fire at a street intersection.
    Recovery efforts continue at the Boyle Heights warehouse owned by Chill Build and leased by Lineage.

    Topline:

    Public records and new statements reveal the owner has engaged with regulators, emergency responders and provided millions in support since the fire began.

    The backstory: For weeks, the Boyle Heights cold-storage warehouse fire has been known simply as the Lineage fire. It’s a label that leaves out a key detail: Lineage Logistics doesn’t own the warehouse. It leases it. The building belongs to Chill Build Los Angeles I LLC, one of several entities associated with Indianapolis-area developer Gary Edwards. While Lineage has been the public face of the cleanup, Chill Build has largely remained out of public view.

    More details: In its first statement since the fire, the company confirmed with The LA Local it has met with regulators, spent millions on the response and believes responsibility for repair and recovery efforts rests with Lineage.

    Read on... for more on Chill Build.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    For weeks, the Boyle Heights cold-storage warehouse fire has been known simply as the Lineage fire. It’s a label that leaves out a key detail: Lineage Logistics doesn’t own the warehouse. It leases it. 

    The building belongs to Chill Build Los Angeles I LLC, one of several entities associated with Indianapolis-area developer Gary Edwards. While Lineage has been the public face of the cleanup, Chill Build has largely remained out of public view. 

    In its first statement since the fire, the company confirmed with The LA Local it has met with regulators, spent millions on the response and believes responsibility for repair and recovery efforts rests with Lineage.

    “Lineage Logistics is the lessee of the entire property. They are responsible for all aspects of maintaining and repairing the facility. Lineage Logistics is in charge of the recovery efforts, communicating with residents, and reporting progress directly to city and county regulators.” 

    Lineage did not respond to questions before publication about its relationship with Chill Build, the division of responsibilities between companies involved or whether it coordinated public communications with the property owner.

    Chill Build was on scene in the first 16 hours of the fire

    Records obtained by The LA Local show senior city inspectors from the L.A. Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) met with Edwards on site on June 24, notifying him that the city would order removal of all fire-damaged portions of the building and require permits before any reconstruction. A photo from a follow-up visit on July 1 shows Edwards standing with inspectors outside the warehouse, the same day the city issued a second order requiring Chill Build to submit a full remediation and monitoring plan, along with weekly progress reports. 

    LADBS acknowledged receiving The LA Local’s questions about why its enforcement orders were issued to Chill Build and how the agency determines whether property owners or tenants are responsible for code enforcement actions, but did not respond before publication.

    Chill Build confirmed it met with the Los Angeles Fire Department multiple times at the property from June 18 to July 6. A spokesperson said the company provided $6.2 million in funding to retain specialty contractors, equipment and resources to help extinguish the fire. 

    A smaller image focuses in on a larger image of a man wearing a yellow hazard vest speaking with a person in an orange hazard vest. Underneath is text that reads the case number, date, and comments describing the photo.
    Senior LADBS inspectors Robert Chavez and Mark Rude speak with property owner Gary Edwards at Chill Build’s warehouse in Boyle Heights on July 1, 2026.
    (
    Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
    )

    The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health has also opened three additional inspections tied to the fire, including one involving Chill Build, according to its public database. A Cal/OSHA spokesperson confirmed the inspections but said the agency could not share further detail while they remain open.

    The owner of the warehouse

    Chill Build purchased the property in March 2017 for $43 million before developing it into the roughly 500,000-square-foot cold-storage facility that now sits fire-damaged. 

    A review of city permits list Chill Build Los Angeles as the owner throughout construction, and at least 10 permits name Victory Unlimited Construction LLC — another company owned by Edwards — as the contractor. 

    One permit lists Chill Build as owner and applicant for the rooftop solar array, the same system linked to fires in both 2024 and again in June. 

    A review of corporate filings shows Edwards listed as manager, member, agent, or governor of at least a dozen companies operating under the Chill Build name across multiple states. Chill Build Los Angeles did not comment further on Edwards’ relationship with the Chill Build entities.

    Chill Build Los Angeles has also been named as a defendant in at least two lawsuits filed over the fire, alongside Lineage, Altus Power, and Pearce Services.

    Has Chill Build engaged with the community?

    While Chill Build says communication with residents is the responsibility of Lineage, the company said it donated $2 million to national nonprofit Baby2Baby’s Disaster Relief & Emergency Response Program on June 24, providing air purifiers, diapers, formula, wipes, children’s N95 masks, food and hygiene products to support impacted children and families. 

    “Our commitment to the community then and now has been to contribute our time, expertise and resources to protecting the health and safety of the firefighters, first responders, and our neighbors in Boyle Heights and the surrounding communities,” the company told The LA Local. “We continue to maintain an active on-site presence supporting the safe cleanup and mitigation of environmental impacts, wherever and whenever needed.” 

    But that outreach has not extended to local leaders. Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, whose district includes Boyle Heights, said the property owner should take a more public role as recovery efforts continue. Her office said it has not had direct conversations with representatives from Chill Build since the fire. 

    “If an organization has responsibilities related to this property — whether as an owner, operator, contractor, or another responsible entity — it should be at the table,” Jurado’s office said in a statement. “Residents deserve direct answers, regular progress reports, supporting documentation, and the opportunity to ask questions of the people responsible for this recovery.”

    Why responsibility for the fire isn’t straightforward 

    Determining fault for the fire itself is complicated. Lineage has said it believes the blaze started while subcontractors Pearce Services tested a rooftop solar system owned by Altus Power. Pearce Services confirmed its crew was doing that rooftop work and Altus says the cause hasn’t been determined. Cal/OSHA has opened inspections naming Lineage, Pearce, Altus, Chill Build, and refrigeration contractor Chillest Industries

    In its statement, Chill Build said Altus, its contractors and other service companies have contractual relationships solely with Lineage Logistics.

    “It just gets to the point where everyone is accountable, and no one is accountable.”

    Susan Phillips, a Pitzer College professor who has tracked warehouse fires since 2021, said that kind of tangle is common. “All of these entities are trying to protect themselves financially,” she said. “It just gets to the point where everyone is accountable, and no one is accountable.”

    Cold-storage warehouses are typically run under industrial leases that split maintenance, repair and operational duties between owner and tenant, with separate agreements sometimes covering rooftop solar or outside contractors. Attorney Gary Praglin, who handles environmental contamination cases, said responsibility usually flows from those lease terms — but landlords don’t get to opt out when there’s a public health risk next door.

    “Landlords cannot turn a blind eye,” Praglin said. “The cleanup can result in further damage. Millions of pounds of rotten food, smelling up the area. A landlord can’t just let that happen because people are being exposed.”

    Lineage has said it is racing to meet Mayor Karen Bass’ 45-day deadline to remove millions of pounds of spoiled food waste from the site.