Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,485 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • LAist review finds companies violated sign rules
    VERNON-RENDERING-PLANT
    Topline:
    Ever heard of a rendering plant? They convert dead animals into ingredients for dozens of products — everything from pet food to fertilizer. These companies reduce food waste, but they can also emit putrid odors.

    Under a local air quality rule, rendering plants that produce certain types of products are required to post signs notifying community members where to report associated odor issues. But an LAist review found that two of these companies were out of compliance in recent years, and a third company has changed its business operations and avoided the pollution rule.
    The findings: Local air quality regulators cited two rendering plants, Darling Ingredients, Inc. and Baker Commodities, Inc., for not having the required signage posted during inspections, according to a review of public records and the South Coast Air Quality Management District's website. Both rendering companies have fixed the problems since then. A third company, Coast Packing Co., has changed its business operations and avoided the pollution rule.

    Read more: This story is part three of our five-part series investigating how rendering plants in, and near, the city of Vernon are impacting residents in Southeast L.A. You can read the main investigation here.

    About five miles southeast of downtown L.A., a cluster of four rendering companies transform leftover meat, bone scraps, and sometimes entire carcasses from chickens, pigs, and cows, into ingredients for new products.

    The facilities are located in Vernon, or just outside the city’s limits. Under a local air quality rule, rendering plants that produce certain types of products are required to post signs notifying community members where to report associated odor issues. But an LAist review found that two of these companies were out of compliance in recent years, and a third company has changed its business operations and avoided the pollution rule.

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) regulates air quality in the region. Public records and the agency’s website show it cited two of the rendering plants, Darling Ingredients, Inc. and Baker Commodities, Inc., for not having the required signage posted during inspections. Both have fixed the problems since then.

    The other company, Coast Packing Co., altered its business model and is now exempt from the rule.

    How rendering odors have impacted local residents

    The city of Vernon is home to about 1,800 businesses. Fashion Nova, a fast-fashion company that largely found success through influencers on social media, and Tapatío hot sauce both have locations in the city. Overall, the businesses produce a wide range of products: food, steel, plastics, and apparel.

    Vernon’s city limits are just five square miles, and it’s almost exclusively industrial with just 222 residents. It’s surrounded by densely populated cities, including Bell, Commerce, Huntington Park and Maywood, as well as the Boyle Heights neighborhood and unincorporated East L.A.

    For decades, community members have grappled with odors emanating from the rendering companies. They’ve described the smells as “nauseating,” “rancid” and “putrid.” To escape the odors, neighbors told LAist they shut their windows and avoid going outdoors — especially in the summer, when the stench can intensify.

    About Vernon’s Rendering Plants

    Three rendering plants are located in the city of Vernon, and a fourth is just outside city limits.

    • Baker Commodities, Inc.
    • Coast Packing Co. 
    • Legacy By-Products LLC 
    • Darling Ingredients, Inc. (located just north of Vernon)

    An LAist review of state and federal licensing and inspection data also found six slaughterhouses, and at least 40 meat processors, within Vernon or very nearby. View our map of the data here.

    How the odor rule works

    In 2017, AQMD adopted a rule that forces rendering plants to take steps to keep potential odors from seeping into the community. Under the rule, the plants must:

    • Store animal matter within four hours of receiving it
    • Repair broken concrete and asphalt to keep odor-causing bacteria from forming in dirty water
    • Wash outgoing trucks. 

    The rule also stipulates that rendering plants must post signs on their property, indicating where community members can report odor issues.

    These signs must include AQMD’s complaint hotline, 1-800-CUT-SMOG (1-800-288-7664), along with the name of the rendering company. The signage must be placed within 50 feet of a facility’s main entrance, with large lettering that contrasts with the background.

    The details of the sign rule violations

    AQMD’s data portal shows that the agency issued a notice to Darling in October 2018, telling the company to post the required signage. The company came into compliance that same month.

    How To Report Odors

    Have you noticed bad smells in your neighborhood?

    If you live within the South Coast Air Quality District’s boundaries (they cover most of L.A. County — you can look up details here), here’s where to file an odor report:

    The data portal also shows that Baker received two notices about the required signage, one in 2018 and another in 2020.

    In an email, AQMD spokesperson Nahal Mogharabi said air quality officials observed that Baker’s sign “was placed more than 50 feet from the main entrance of the facility” during an unannounced inspection in September 2018. The company’s guard shack also obstructed the sign from public view. AQMD confirmed that the sign was moved to comply with the rule by December of that year.

    During another inspection in February 2020, inspectors noticed that Baker’s sign contained new “extraneous information,” which interfered with the public's ability to read the hotline phone number, Mogharabi added. Air quality officials issued a second notice. Baker made the required changes within two months of the notice from air regulators, and voluntarily added a translation for Spanish speakers.

    In visits to each location, LAist found Coast is the only rendering plant in the area without the signage.

    Chavis Ferguson, vice president of operations at Coast, said he had no comment. A spokesperson for Darling said they were not available by deadline. Baker, which is suing AQMD for shutting it down, declined multiple interview requests.

    In an emailed statement, spokesperson Jimmy Andreoli II said Baker is “dedicated to finding sustainable ways to support California’s food production and restaurant industries with continued strict adherence to local, state, and federal environmental laws.”

    Why one rendering company isn’t subject to the odor rule 

    Founded in 1922, Coast is located along the L.A. River next to the shuttered Farmer John slaughterhouse and rendering plant building — famous for large murals of pigs grazing on an idyllic farm.

    The company is currently exempt from the rule’s signage requirements, according to AQMD spokesperson Connie Mejia.

    The signage requirements, she explained, only apply to facilities engaged in inedible rendering, which produce ingredients for products that are not for human consumption. This includes fertilizer, soap, and pet food.

    When the rule was adopted in 2017, Mejia added, Coast performed this type of rendering and was subject to the rule. But they’ve changed their work flow since then. Right now, Coast processes animal tissue into products like lard. That work isn’t subject to the rule. Mejia said it’s “not as odorous.”

    If Coast resumes inedible rendering — the smellier type of rendering — the signage requirements “will become effective,” she wrote. Coast still holds a license to conduct that work, according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

    Why the signage matters 

    Joseph Lyou, president and CEO of the L.A.-based nonprofit the Coalition for Clean Air, is a former AQMD governing board member and voted in support of the odor mitigation rule back in 2017.

    “All you have to do is drive around [Vernon] on a bad day, and you will find absolutely disgusting odors from these facilities,” he said.

    Lyou noted that people who live in the surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly working-class Latinos.

    “The idea [behind the rule] was that the South Coast Air Quality Management District has the authority — and the responsibility — of providing some protection to this community,” he said.

    We shared our findings with Julia Stein, deputy director at UCLA’s Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. She said the rule’s signage requirement is essential.

    “When [community members] notice really strong odors coming from the facility, [the signage] is how they understand that there is actually a regulator that's involved,” said Stein, who previously worked as an attorney advising clients on regulatory compliance. “Without that signage there, folks might be experiencing those problems, but not understand that they have some sort of recourse.”

    On top of the unpleasant odors, Stein added, these types of facilities often emit hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, which “can cause pretty significant health impacts.” Associated problems include skin and eye irritation, difficulty breathing, “and, potentially, even interfering with brain function,” she said.

    Credits

    This story is part of a series that was reported over the course of many months and required extensive interviews in the community and a dozen public records requests. Julia Barajas is the lead reporter and Mary Plummer is the main story editor.

    More on the LAist team behind this investigation:

    Reporting:

    Editing:

    Visuals:

    Other support:

    The Jane and Ron Olson Center for Investigative Reporting helped make this project possible. Ron Olson is an honorary trustee of Southern California Public Radio. The Olsons do not have any editorial input on the stories we cover.

  • With days left, US opening match not sold out

    Topline:

    Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

    More details: Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    Why now: Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup final — while the cheapest are $1,120.

    Read on... for more on the opening matches.

    Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

    Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    The number is even higher for Canada's opening match against Bosnia Herzegovina in Toronto on the same day, with 226 tickets left in FIFA's website and a high number of tickets available in resale markets.

    That's unusual for high-profile events such as the opening matches of the World Cup — traditionally among the hardest to get tickets in the tournament. This year will feature three hosts in the U.S., Canada and Mexico — but so far only Mexico's opening match against South Africa on Thursday looks to be virtually sold out.

    Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup finalwhile the cheapest are $1,120.


    Even President Trump said he wouldn't pay those prices.

    "I would certainly like to be there, but I wouldn't pay it either, to be honest with you," Trump told the New York Post in a recent interview.

    The other two remaining games for the U.S. national have far fewer tickets available, given that prices are well below the ones for the opening match.

    Prices have also fallen sharply

    There are not only plenty of tickets left to sell — a number of them are also available below FIFA's face value. According to Ticketdata, which tracks prices across the resale platforms, the cheapest pair of tickets for the opening match for the U.S. and Canada was $951 as of Monday morning, while in FIFA's resale platform, tickets were available for as low as $690.

    Other games across the 104-match tournament also still have many tickets left to sell — despite FIFA President Gianni Infantino's claim that every match is "already sold out." That's especially the case for lesser well known teams such as the Jordan against Algeria match, which still had hundreds of unsold seats in the FIFA's web site.

    Demand for high-profile tickets such as Argentina and Portugal was far higher, however, with many of those games looking largely sold out.

    Will the opening matches sell out?

    Whether eventually the U.S. and Canada opening matches will sell out is hard to answer. Throughout the sales process, FIFA has closely guarded how many tickets it has actually sold and how many are left to sell, making it virtually impossible to gauge.

    In addition, like other teams, FIFA could also sell tickets in other platforms including third-party ones such as SeatGeek, which can further obscure how many tickets are left to sell.

    FIFA and organizers, however, are hoping for a surge in excitement that leads to a last-minute rush of sales for the opening matches as well as for those such as Jordan against Algeria that look far from being sold out.

    Ben Shields, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, says perceptions so far of the tournament have been shaped by how expensive tickets and travel has been for a tournament taking place across an entire continent.

    That, he says, "does not seem to sit well with many."

    But that could change.

    "The hope or bet — for FIFA is that once the matches start — and the greatest players in the world compete for the most prestigious prize of them all, the sport as business lens will fade into the background and the World Cup will be seen and experienced as the enduring global institution that it is," Shields says. "We shall see."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • OC supervisors expected to discuss Tuesday
    A man in a chair wearing a suit jacket, tie and glasses looks forward with a microphone in front of him. A sign in front has the official seal of the County of Orange and states "Andrew Do, Vice Chairman, District 1."
    Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do at the board of supervisors meeting on Nov. 28, 2023

    Topline:

    Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

    The backstory: Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district. As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking over $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

    What they want: Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor — Janet Nguyen — said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators. Other supervisors have advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money.

    Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

    Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district.

    As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking more than $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

    Federal officials recovered money from seized bank accounts and two properties connected to Do’s scheme — including the Tustin house his daughter bought.

    The county Board of Supervisors is expected to publicly discuss plans for the recovered funds as they make decisions on the overall county budget at their meeting Tuesday. Public comment will also be taken.

    What to do with the money?

    Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators.

    “For the past five years, every other district in Orange County has benefitted from the same community funds to support their cities, nonprofits, civic projects which strengthens their communities,” Supervisor Janet Nguyen wrote in a mass email to constituents last week. “However, our district went without because Do stole what belonged to our residents.”

    “This money was stolen from the First District, and it must come back to the First District,” Nguyen added.

    Nguyen was Do’s mentor and former boss more than a decade ago, before the two had a bitter falling out by 2016.

    She encouraged residents of her district to send letters to the board and to speak during public comments.

    Several county supervisors told LAist they supported a similar approach, one in which the recovered money goes to support the original intended recipients: seniors and people with disabilities in Do’s former district. Some supervisors have since advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money, noting that it was meant to address disruptions caused by the pandemic. Now that years have passed since the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns, some supervisors argue community needs have changed.

    “We are so many years on, and the problems that money originally was to address (mostly Covid impacts) are now behind us, that I think we should have a discussion about how and where to spend it,” Supervisor Don Wagner told LAist via text message in March. “The budget is so tight and the needs so great across the county.”

    Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento said he’d work toward a fair distribution of the funds to best serve residents, with a focus on current needs.

    “We will definitely consider what areas of the County were harmed by Do’s scheme, but we must also remember that the funds were intended for relief efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, a threat we are no longer facing,” he said in March. “We also need to consider addressing the current needs of residents with any dollars returned to the county.”

    Millions more haven’t been recovered, at least yet

    The amount of taxpayer money recovered so far is less than half of the $7.9 million Andrew Do admitted was diverted from specific meal contracts.

    In a lawsuit seeking to recover funds, the county alleges the total amount lost in the scheme was even larger: $13.25 million. The county’s suit — scheduled for trial in November 2027 — covers all of the money Do gave to two nonprofits accused in the scheme, Viet America Society and Hand to Hand Relief Organization.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    That leaves more than $4 million — and possibly much more — not yet recovered.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office noted they have an ongoing criminal case against Do’s alleged co-conspirator Peter Pham.

    “Assuming we obtain a conviction in that matter, we would expect to seek restitution,” the spokesperson, Ciaran McEvoy, said.

    Pham left the country on a flight to Taiwan in late 2024 and remains a fugitive, according to McEvoy. The case against him also includes charges against another alleged co-conspirator, Thanh Huong Nguyen, who led the Hand to Hand nonprofit.

  • Fans watch US men’s national team's practice
    A mother and daughter with medium skinned stand smiling. The daughter is wearing a stars and stripe head scarf. Behind them is a soccer field with players standing and sitting.
    The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.

    Topline:

    More than 6,000 fans watched a U.S. Men's National Soccer Team practice Monday morning at their base camp at Great Park Sports Complex in Irvine. It's the only time the team will practice in public during the World Cup.

    Why it matters: For fans of the US Men's National Soccer Team, it's a rare chance to see them without an expensive ticket. Thousands signed up for a lottery, with many left disappointed.

    What's at stake: The U.S. men’s team is representing co-host country USA in this 2026 World Cup, a country that has millions of youth in soccer leagues nationwide but that is often bested in international play by much smaller countries.

    Why Irvine: The team will use the soccer field and stadium at the Great Park as their training facility during the team’s three group play matches at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

    The backstory: The U.S. men’s team has not made it to quarterfinals in the World Cup since 2002.

    What's next: The U.S. plays Paraguay on June 12, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

    Fans of the U.S. Men’s National Soccer Team swelled the stadium at the Great Park in Irvine on Monday to watch players practice for the first time since arriving at the training facility they’ll call home for the first round of the 2026 World Cup.

    “Seeing them play right now… it was really cool to see how they play and how they practice,” said Mila Ran, who came with her mother from nearby Mission Viejo.

    “This whole time she’s saying, 'I want to go shoot, I want to go play,'” said Mila’s mother, Farah Ran.

    They were among about 6,000 people who won free entry to the practice in a lottery that received more than 30,000 entries, according to Irvine officials.

    A light skinned teenage boy and a light skinned woman, both wearing Team USA T shirts, stand in line next to a green field.
    Fans got to the venue early.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    The team’s biggest stars — Christian Pulisic, Antonee Robinson and others — showed off their ball handling skills, honed over years of play on U.S. youth fields and overseas in professional leagues. Fans yelled, waved U.S. flags, held up homemade signs, and did the wave several times.

    Soccer players wearing a black uniform play soccer on a green pitch.
    The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    After the roughly 45-minute practice, some players walked to the sidelines to take selfies with fans and sign autographs.

    The players know it’s going to take more than this, however, to live up to expectations during the World Cup.

    A light skinned man with blonde hair tied into a bun, wearing a soccer strip, kneels down to sign an autograph for a young boy with medium skin and dark hair. He's surrounded by other young boys wearing USA soccer shirts.
    US men's national team player Tim Ream signs an autograph for a fan.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “To be in a position to train in front of these people today… is such a unique opportunity and one that none of us take for granted,” said backup goalie Matt Freese before the practice. “We’re working as hard as we can, as focused as we can to leave the next generation inspired."

    The U.S. men’s team and their training staff will use the Great Park facility over the next several weeks as the team plays Paraguay on Friday, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

  • Accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire
    A distraught woman holds a bag while gesturing to a car as fire and smoke billow in the background.
    A woman cries as the Palisades Fire advances in Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7, 2025.

    Topline:

    Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    The charges: Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

    How we got here: Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smoldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

    Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

    How we got here

    Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smouldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

    What prosecutors say

    In a court filing in April, prosecutors allege Rinderknecht displayed “extreme anger, indignation, and frustration” because he had to spend New Year's Eve alone. After driving around for Uber, Rinderknecht hiked up a popular trail and set chaparral alight in a clearing, according to prosecutors.

    “He then started calling 911 multiple times, hiked down the hill, and fled the area in his car before firefighters arrived. Defendant returned to the area after he saw fire trucks arriving and then took videos of the firefighting efforts,” prosecutors wrote.

    The filing also states that Rinderknecht threatened to burn down his sister’s home.

    Prosecutors are expected to argue that Rinderknecht started the smaller blaze knowing it could turn into a bigger inferno.

    U.S. District Court Judge Anne Hwang has previously expressed the government’s position could confuse jurors.

    What the defense says

    Defense attorney Steve Haney previously told reporters that prosecutors were trying to blame Rinderknecht for a fire that started days before the Palisades Fire.

    "Well what about what happened between Jan. 1 and Jan. 7?" he asked. "Jonathan wasn't out there with a fire hose putting that fire out at the Lachman location, the Fire Department was. So why are they blaming him for whatever the Fire Department didn't do?"