One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
Some Federal Scientists, Miserable Under Trump, Cautiously Optimistic About A Biden Future
The buildings of downtown Los Angeles are partially obscured in the afternoon on November 5, 2019 as seen from near Pasadena, California. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Over the past four years, the Trump administration repeatedly attacked science on multiple fronts, especially when it came to climate change.
Now that Joe Biden has been elected President, we wanted to find out how scientists are feeling about this last presidential term, and whether they're looking forward to what a Biden-Harris administration might bring.
FOUR DEMORALIZING YEARS
In short, the majority of scientists LAist spoke with said that they'd found the last four years demoralizing. Some said it had led them to question whether they should continue to work for the federal government, and that there's a lot of work to be done to repair the damage the Trump administration had done.
"I think it's clear that science has been suppressed, has been in some cases manipulated and distorted," said scientist Jane Lubchenco, who led the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under President Obama.
"People need to know that the information the government is providing is accurate and not manipulated for selfish reasons," Lubchenco said, "And that's true whether it's a weather forecast or information about the pandemic."
Sponsored message
A number of scientists who work for federal agencies echoed her thoughts, but they asked for anonymity so that they could speak candidly about how they felt their work had been stifled, and their communications with the press and public stymied.
Multiple scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey told me that speaking with the press is now an overly cumbersome process, a problem detailed in a Los Angeles Times story back in 2018.
While in the past they could casually speak with reporters, under Trump, the scientists said they had to submit both questions and potential answers to the Department of the Interior, which would either approve or deny the request. Interviews were regularly delayed, sometimes for days.
"In practice, the department can simply prevent the interview they don't want to happen by being slow -- a soft refusal of sorts," said one federal scientist who didn't want to be named. "It is quite annoying not being free to talk about my own research results when they are published, for example. These results are taxpayer funded. The public and media have a right to know about them."
In that same vein, another federal scientist whose work touches on the impacts of climate change said that press releases about their work had downplayed the severity of some of their findings.
"The message has been clear that this isn't a priority. Understanding climate impacts and things like that. And I think if left to their whim they'd do away with it completely," the scientist said.
In extreme instances, scientists said they have had their work completely stifled, and funding pulled.
Sponsored message
"It's very demoralizing and it's hard to take. It's hard to handle it," said Andrew Leising, a research oceanographer at NOAA.
"We need career scientists who are in sync with reality at the top."
Some were so unhappy with how things were going that they left their jobs.
A SIGH OF RELIEF
Nearly everyone I spoke with is cautiously optimistic about what's to come. President-elect Biden has emphasized the importance of science, and specifically, climate change. Though it'll take some time to see which policies are reversed, and how they choose to allocate funding.
"What's exciting for federal scientists is that we don't have to tiptoe around these issues in public," said one federal scientist who wished to remain anonymous, for the same fear of retribution expressed by others.
"A Biden/Harris administration would mean finally letting sunlight, fresh air and evidence back into the room where decisions are made about peoples health, lives and future," Lubchenco said.
Sponsored message
She added, "I think there's a lot of work to do."
GO DEEPER:
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
