With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Should California Divest from Israel?
Back-dropped by the golden shrine of the Dome of the Rock, Palestinian youth play on a sofa in Ras al-Amud just outside Jerusalem's Old City this past Sunday (AP Photo/Oded Balilty)
()
Back-dropped by the golden shrine of the Dome of the Rock, Palestinian youth play on a sofa in Ras al-Amud just outside Jerusalem's Old City this past Sunday (AP Photo/Oded Balilty)
Two new ballot initiatives were cleared for circulation this week by the Secretary of State's office. This is the stage where backers must get over 400,000 signatures from Californians to qualify for the ballot. Of the two, the most notable one would prohibit state retirement funds from investing in Israel.
Specifically, the Public Employees’ Retirement System and State Teachers’ Retirement System would be verboten from "investing in companies doing business in Israel," according to the proposition's language. Continued: "Requires these funds to sell existing investments in companies that continue to do business in Israel. Requires divestment to comply with fiduciary responsibilities." Some investments would be excluded, such as humanitarian, health and educational efforts.
Why do this? In an e-mail to LAist, the prop's sponsor explains. "It has been 17 years since the Oslo Peace Accords were signed between the Palestinians and the Israelis and the occupation and settlement of Palestine by Israel continues," writes Chris Yatooma. "My government does nothing to change this violation of international law and in fact is complicit in the violation of the law because it provides $3.5 billion in taxpayers funds to Israel that supports these settlement activities. Just as it took local and state government campaigns to change Apartheid South Africa through boycotts and divestments, we plan a similar peaceful economic boycott and divestment of Israel until it ends its occupation of Paletine."
Support for LAist comes from
Interestingly enough, the Obama administration and Israel's Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu have been at odds this week over a building 1,600 housing units in east Jerusalem.
And at UC Berkeley this week, the Associated Students of the school are urging the "the university and U.C. Board of Regents to divest from companies that supply Israel with materials allegedly used to perpetuate war crimes," according to Jweekly.
In response, attorney and author Alan Dershowitz along with StandWithUs/Voice For Israel issued a statement about such actions. “Divesting from Israel is immoral, bigoted and if done by a state university, illegal,” the statement said. “It encourages terrorism and discouraged peace. …We will fight back against this selective bigotry that hurts the good name of the University of California.” If Yatooma's prop goes to the ballot, expect a larger debate.
As for the other initiative cleared for circulation, it seeks to change how ballot summaries are written, changing the duty from Attorney General to Legislative Analyst, among other changes. Two versions of this initiative were submitted.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to declare immigration enforcement actions a local emergency. -
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues. -
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week. -
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce. -
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
Best of LAist