With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
How a genetically modified purple tomato was mistakenly identified as non-GMO
AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:
This winter as seed catalogs started showing up in gardeners' mailboxes, one stood out. Baker Creek Heirloom Seed Company splashed photos of the purple galaxy tomato on its cover. It bragged, This beauty is believed to be the first and the purplest non-GMO purple tomato in the universe. The only problem - it was genetically modified. Here's Boise State Public Radio's Sasa Woodruff.
SASA WOODRUFF, BYLINE: A tomato with purple flesh has been a holy grail of plant breeders because it means a higher level of the antioxidant anthocyanin. That's the purple pigment in eggplant and blueberries that gives them superfood status. Traditional breeding has only ever produced one with purple skin. When John Brazaitis of Baker Creek Heirloom Seeds heard from a hobby farmer in France who had bred a purple flesh tomato, he went to check it out.
JOHN BRAZAITIS: When we first saw the tomato, it was just - bells went off. It was fireworks. It was just a beautiful moment.
WOODRUFF: GMOs are banned in France, and so Baker Creek acquired the seeds assuming they were non-GMO. But some scientists and tomato enthusiasts weren't so sure.
DAVID FRANCIS: When they came out with that catalog and I saw the picture, I had discussions with colleagues about it, and all of us just looked at it and said, well, that's the GMO tomato.
WOODRUFF: That's David Francis, a professor of crop science at Ohio State University who specializes in tomato genetics. He's talking about a plant developed by a lab in the U.K. using snapdragon flower genes. It took 20 years to develop, and it was approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 2022. Nathan Pumplin is with Norfolk Healthy Produce. It's the U.S. arm of the company that developed the GMO purple tomato. When he saw Instagram videos of Baker Creek's version, he contacted them.
NATHAN PUMPLIN: I was very curious, open-minded, interested to learn more about how it came about.
WOODRUFF: Baker Creek's tomato initially tested negative for a known GMO marker. But after some back-and-forth, Baker Creek pulled it and destroyed the stock. So how did a plant with DNA from an unrelated organism end up in an heirloom seed catalog? Baker Creek's Brazaitis says he's not a scientist, but...
BRAZAITIS: Here we are, the tip of the spear on this issue now. What does it all actually mean? What happens when you see a cross in your backyard and you don't know it?
WOODRUFF: Tomato expert Francis says this isn't a case of the modified tomato genes escaping into the wild from a lab.
FRANCIS: I don't think it's a runaway train. You could easily argue that Baker Creek has it in their catalog because somebody misappropriated it and they didn't do their due diligence.
WOODRUFF: Baker Creek didn't specifically test for snapdragon genes, and Francis says humans were most certainly involved in the spread.
FRANCIS: Who knows how it got out? It's not like an escape. It's, you know, somebody took it and said, hey, I'm going to play with this.
WOODRUFF: Still, Baker Creek's Brazaitis is concerned and says gardeners won't know if they're growing GMOs.
BRAZAITIS: We were absolutely over the moon about, oh, my gosh, we found this really unique variety. The comedown from that has been really hard.
WOODRUFF: There are fears that GMOs could take over, but Francis says that's unfounded, and tomato biodiversity is thriving.
FRANCIS: Contemporary tomatoes - you know, what we're using today - are more genetically diverse than the heirloom tomatoes of old.
WOODRUFF: That's because as traditional breeders improve disease resistance and nutrition, our food gene pool is actually widening.
For NPR News, I'm Sasa Woodruff.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC) Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.