Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Is Removing Crosswalks Really The Best Way To Deal With A Los Feliz Homeless Encampment?
Sitting in the middle of the big jumble of an intersection where Hollywood Boulevard, Vermont Avenue and Prospect Avenue all converge is a modest triangular shaped mini-park. Rebuilt into its current form in 2008 by affable man (and then L.A. City Councilmember) Tom LaBonge, the parklet was hailed as a utilitarian use of urban space. For $800,000 of municipal money, the triangle gained some trees, some lighting and some benches for public use.
Of course, Los Angeles' burgeoning population of homeless people means that, over the past couple years, the small park in the middle of three streets has—like so many other parks across L.A.—become a de-facto homeless encampment on a continuing basis.
To "remedy" this problem, the East Hollywood Business Improvement District is proposing to, essentially, revoke public access to the parklet. As the Los Feliz Ledger reports, the East Hollywood BID has developed a plan to remove the four crosswalks that connect the Vermont 'triangle' to sidewalks along Hollywood, Vermont and Prospect, thereby rendering the triangle technically inaccessible. As East Hollywood BID treasurer Susanna Furios explained to the Ledger, "people can walk a bit."
Along with removing the crosswalks, the plan submitted would also remove the parklet's lighting, seating and sidewalks, and would re-landscape the space into one that, as Curbed L.A. phrases it, sends "the message that the space is not for loitering." How exactly that message would conveyed though landscaping (if not a fence?) isn't quite clear.
As the BID's Vice Chair Jeff Zarrinnam told the Ledger, "The Triangle is a median. It's not a park. It never has been a park. People were trying to turn it into a park, but it's a traffic median."
Regardless of whether the space is considered a park or not, the removal of four crosswalks will prompt pedestrians, particularly those walking on the western edge of Vermont Avenue, to take more a circuitous route. Where the journey down Vermont currently entails crossing only Prospect and Hollywood, the same trip after the proposed crosswalk removal would add two extra crossings of Vermont not currently needed. The crosswalks are in a neighborhood with high pedestrian activity, and are regularly used by folks walking throughout Los Feliz Village and down to the Red Line subway station one block to the south on Sunset Boulevard.
It's also probably worth noting that removing the crosswalks doesn't actually bar access to the triangle. It's easy enough to cross the Prospect Avenue to the triangle when there's no oncoming traffic, and if anything removing pedestrian foot traffic from the triangle makes it more appealing to the city's homeless to set up camp.
At the very least, put up a construction fence around the park and leave the crosswalks open. It's only inevitable that jaywalking pedestrians will continue to cross the street without a signal. People can walk a bit, or they can just go straight along the route that makes the most logical sense.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.