Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


City Owes $26 Million To Trash Workers Banned From Lunchtime Naps

A trash truck, probably manned by a sleeping city employee! Oh no! (Photo by hercwad via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
Before you
Dear reader, we're asking you to help us keep local news available for all. Your financial support keeps our stories free to read, instead of hidden behind paywalls. We believe when reliable local reporting is widely available, the entire community benefits. Thank you for investing in your neighborhood.

The city's decision to ban trash truck drivers from taking naps has come back to bite them. The city was worried about taxpayers "catching" sleeping drivers on the job, but now those same taxpayers will be paying $26 million.

The huge payout was agreed to by the city council in a closed-door meeting yesterday. It's the costly end result of an eight-year class action lawsuit that was sparked after a driver sued over the right to take a nap on his break, the Los Angeles Times reports.

The attorney who represented the drivers, Matthew Taylor, claims that the city overreached when they banned naps. He said the drivers were under "employer control" during breaks, meaning that they were technically on duty when they shouldn't have been and would have to receive back pay for break time that was lost.

"In order for a meal break to be off duty, you have to be completely removed from employer control, which means you can go where you want to go and do what you want to do," Taylor said.

Support for LAist comes from

The city agreed to the payout because they were facing an even steeper $40 million payout, in addition to the Superior Court siding with the drivers, the Times says. The payout will mean that each driver named in the suit will get around $15,000.

City Councilman Mike Bonin called the Superior Court ruling "obscenely ridiculous" and said the sight of sleeping sanitation workers would deeply offend the residents of his district.

So, recapping, that's $26 million of taxpayer money dished out because the city did not want to offend taxpayers. The universe is awesome sometimes.