Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Tinder Is Furious Over Billboards Encouraging Users To Get STD Checks
Tinder is demanding the removal of new billboards that draw a connection between their dating app and getting tested for sexually transmitted diseases.
The blue and purple billboards in question feature the words "Tinder, Chlamydia, Grindr, Gonorrhea" on the silhouettes of heads, followed by "FreeSTDCheck.org." Put up by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the billboards first appeared in various locations around L.A. last week—including just blocks from Tinder's headquarters on Beverly Blvd. in West Hollywood, reports CBS LA. AHF—an L.A.-based non-profit, which provides prevention services, testing, and healthcare for HIV patients—contends that the billboards are intended to encourage regular STD screening, especially among users of dating apps like Tinder and Grindr. Tinder, on the other hand, is not a fan of the billboards and have sent a cease and desist order to AHF, demanding that the billboards be removed.
"These unprovoked and wholly unsubstantiated accusations are made to irreparably damage Tinder's reputation in an attempt to encourage others to take an HIV test by your organization," Tinder attorney Jonathan Reichman said in a letter to AHF, according to the L.A. Times.
AHF, however, is standing its ground and says they won't remove the billboards. (You've probably seen their other billboards around town, including the fiery syphilis one.)
"In many ways, location-based mobile dating apps are becoming a digital bathhouse for millennials wherein the next sexual encounter can literally just be a few feet away—as well as the next STD," explained Whitney Engeran-Cordova, AHF's public health division director, said in a statement about the billboards. "While these sexual encounters are often intentionally brief or even anonymous, sexually transmitted diseases can have lasting effects on an individual's personal health and can certainly create epidemics in communities at large."
In their response, AHF also cited several recent studies that link the use of dating apps and an increase in STDs and high risk behaviors. The foundation also referenced a recent Vanity Fair article that explores the rise in casual hookups with the use of apps like Tinder. Tinder was apparently not a big fan of that article either, and responded to it with a tirade on Twitter.
Grindr—a location-based dating app for gay men, which is also on the billboards—has dropped AHF's paid ads for free STD testing on their site. But otherwise, they don't seem to be as upset as Tinder is about the billboard.
"As one of the world's largest gay platforms, we take this issue very seriously," Grindr said in a statement to the Times. "At the end of the day, we are all on the same side in this issue, and strive to work with our partners and advocacy groups to achieve similar goals. A more connected and informed gay community is a better thing for us all."
What will happen next in the standoff between AHF and Tinder remains to be seen.
Did u accidentally catch the Tinder from someone? Take this test and know for sure. pic.twitter.com/JUMjYmGQrw
— Jenka (@babiejenks) September 27, 2015
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.