Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City Council To Vote On Controversial Westwood Bike Lanes For The Third Time

This Friday will mark the third time, the Los Angeles City Council will vote on whether or not to approve proposed bike lanes on Westwood Boulevard and South Central Avenue this Friday. Despite continual support from the city's planning department—not to forget hundreds of public commenters—the lanes on the two roads have been repeatedly tied up thanks to the dexterous work of a few people who really don't want them.
At a meeting of the city's Transportation Committee yesterday, city officials voted 3-1 in favor of omitting the proposed lanes on Westwood and Central from the city's plan, and instead add lanes to peripheral streets close to the main road, according to Streetsblog Los Angeles. The choice to add peripheral lanes is an update to a previous decision to simply eliminate the lanes altogether.
If the proposed changes are endorsed by the L.A. City Council on Friday, the proposed changes to the city plan will be kicked back to L.A.'s Department of Planning for analysis. It's probably worth noting that the Department of Planning officially supports adding lanes to both Central Avenue and Westwood Boulevard, and have rejected past proposals to eliminate lanes on the roads.
Though the public comment session at yesterday's Transportation Committee meeting was nearly unanimous in its support for keeping the lanes on Westwood and Central, the respective L.A. City Councilmembers for the districts where the lanes supposed to be located are staunchly opposed.
Publicly, both Paul Koretz, of West L.A., and Curren Price, of South L.A., have embraced a sort-of anti-logic that believes bike lanes lead to more collisions between bikes and cars. Price emailed Streetsblog L.A. late last year saying how "as a grandfather of small children," he "would feel uneasy riding our bikes along this busy thoroughfare knowing the dangerous implications."
The lanes are tied up in a greater citywide drama unfolding around the city's updated transportation plan dubbed Mobility Plan 2035, a fundamental reorientation of the city's transportation ideology. Instead of focusing on getting personal vehicles to flow across the city as quickly as possible (officially considered a lost cause), the city will work to transform L.A.'s transportation infrastructure into one where people can rely on to alternative and public transportation.
Mobility Plan 2035 includes bike lanes on Westwood Boulevard and Central Avenue. The plan follows that by giving people a chance to ride their bicycles in a designated space, they'll be more inclined to ride (not drive) along these dense commercial corridors. This hypothetically translates into fewer cars clogging up the roads and air, as well as healthier people.
But not everyone thinks this is right. Mobility Plan 2035 was challenged in court by a citizens group called Fix the City last year, which argued the city had failed to conduct the proper amendment process when it was first passed. The city rescinded and re-approved the plan, according to KPCC. The lanes were included in this first re-approval, entirely distinct of their tie up with Koretz and Price this year.
What will probably happen from here is the City Council will approve the proposed amendments on Friday, and the whole thing will get kicked back to the planning department to study alternatives. After a month or so, the planning department will return its recommendations to the city council, at which point the city council can decide whether or not to approve them or not. The City Council can also override the Department of Planning's recommendations with a three-fourths majority vote, according to Ted Rogers.
Ahh, democracy.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.